Disclosure of information to potential subjects on research recruitment Web sites

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 15-20

  Klitzman, Robert ^a   Albala, Ilene ^b   Siracusa, Joseph ^c   Patel, Jicnasha ^d   Appelbaum, Paul S ^e,f  

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d Barnard College of Columbia University   (United States)

^e Department of Psychiatry ^*

^f Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; PATIENT SELECTION; STATISTICS;

DISCLOSURE; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT SELECTION;

EID: 38849118390     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pew Internet and American Life Project. Demographics of Internet Users, October 2006. http://www.pewinternet.org/trends/User_Demo_4.26.06.htm.
2. Department of Health and Human Services Office for Human Research Protections. Guidance on Institutional Review Board Review of Clinical Trial Websites. When is IRB review of clinical trial websites required? September 2005. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/policy/clinicaltrials.html
3. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information Sheets. Guidance for Institutional Review Boards and Clinical Investigators: 1998 Update. Recruiting study participants: A. Media advertising. October 2006. http://www.fda.gov/oc/ohrt/irbs/toc4.html.
4. See ref. 3, U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2006.
5. See ref. 2, Department of Health and Human Services Office for Human Research Protections 2005.
6. Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 1979;47;263-291.
7. Klitzman R. Views and approaches toward risks and benefits among doctors who become patients. Patient Education and Counseling 2006;64:61-68.
8. Kaplan AB, Aamodt MG, Wilk D. The relationship between advertisement variables and applicant responses to newspaper recruitment advertisements. Journal of Business and Psychology 1991;5(3);383-395.
9. Braddy PW, Thompson LF, Wuensch KL, Grossnickle WF. Internet recruiting: The effects of Web page design features. Social Science Computer Review 2003;21(3);374-385.
10. Herrerias C. Use of print media to attract "hard-to-reach" research participants. Journal of Social Service Research 1993;17(3/4);91-105.
11. Davey R, Edwards SM, Cochrane T. Recruitment strategies for a clinical trial of community-based water therapy for osteoarthritis. British Journal of General Practice 2003;53;315-317.;
12. Ota KS, Friedman L, Ashford JW, Hernandez B, Penner AL, Stepp AM, Raam R, Yesavage JA. The cost-time index: A new method for measuring the efficiencies of recruitmentresources in clinical trials. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2006;27;494-497;
13. MacEntee MI, Wyatt C, Kiyak HA, Hujoel PP, Persson RE, Persson GR, Powell LV. Response to direct and indirect recruitment for a randomized dental clinical trial in a multicultural population of elders. Community Dentistry and Oral Epidemiology 2002;30;377-381.
14. Winker MA, Flanagin A, Chi-Lum B, et al. Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the internet: Principles governing AMA web sites. JAMA 2000;283(12):1600-1606.
15. Huang JY, Discepola F, Al-Fozan H, Tulandi T. Quality of fertility clinic websites. fertility and Sterility 2005;83(3);538-544.
16. Emanuel E. Undue inducement: Nonsense on stilts? American Journal of Bioethics 2005;5(5):9-13.
17. See ref. 14, Emanuel 2005.
18. Weise KL, Smith ML, Maschke KJ, et al. National practices regarding payment to research subjects for participating in pediatric research. Pediatrics 2002;110;577-582;
19. Dickert N, Emanuel E, Grady C. Paying research subjects: An analysis of current policies. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002;136(5):368-373;
20. Iltis AS, DeVader S, Matsuo H. Payments to children and adolescents enrolled in research: A pilot study. Pediatrics 2006;118;1546-1552;
21. Borzekowski DL, Rickert VI, Ipp L, et al. At what price? The current state of subject payment in adolescent research. Journal of Adolescent Health 2003;33;378-384;
22. Latterman J, Merz JF. How much are subjects paid to participate in research? American Journal of Bioethics 2001;1(2);45-46;
23. Grady C, Dickert N, Jawetz T, et al. An analysis of U.S. practices of paying research participants. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2005;26:365-375.
24. Klitzman R, Siragusa J, Albala I, et al. The reporting of compensation in reports of research. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics (in press);
25. Bentley JP, Thacker, PG. The influence of risk and monetary payment on the research participation decisionmaking process. Journal of Medical Ethics 2003;30:293-298;
26. Halpern S, Karlawish J, Casaren D, et al. Empirical assessment of whether moderate payments are undue or unjust inducements for participation in clinical trials. Archives of Internal Medicine 2004;164:801-803;
27. Kamb ML, Rhodes F, Hoxworth T, et al. What about money? Effect of small monetary incentives on enrolment, retention, and motivation to hange behavior in an HIV/STD prevention counseling intervention. Sexually Transmitted Infections 1998;74;253-255.
28. Mokdad AH, Ford ES, Bowman BA, et al. Diabetes trends in the U.S.: 1990-1998. Diabetes Care 2000;23(9);1278-1283.
29. Hasin DS, Goodwin RD, Stinson FS, et al. Epidemiology of major depressive disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry 2005;62:1097-1106.
30. See ref. 3, U.S. Food and Drug Administration 2006.
31. Morin K, Rakatansky H, Riddick FA, et al. Managing conflicts of interest in the conduct of clinical trials. JAMA 2002;287(1);78-84.
32. Perlis RH, Perlis CS, Wu Y, et al. Industry sponsorship and financial conflict of interest in the reporting of clinical trials in psychiatry. American Journal of Psychiatry 2005;162(10);1957-1960.