Simulation performance checklist generation using the Delphi technique

Canadian Journal of Anesthesia

Volumn 54, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 992-997

  Morgan, Pamela J ^a,b   Lam McCulloch, Jenny ^a   Herold McIlroy, Jodi ^a   Tarshis, Jordan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b WOMEN S COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANESTHESIST; ARTICLE; CHECKLIST; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DELPHI STUDY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

EID: 38849107618     PISSN: 0832610X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03016633     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Clayton M. Delphi: a technique to harness expert opinion for critical decision-making tasks in education. Educ Psychol 1997; 17: 373-86.
2. Martino J. Technological Forecasting for Decision Making, 2nd ed. New York: North-Holland; 1983.
3. Lavis JN, Anderson GM. Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications. CMAJ 1996; 154: 321-8.
4. Brook RH, Kamberg CJ. Appropriateness of the use of cardiovascular procedures: a method and results of this application. Schweiz Med Wochenschr 1993; 123: 249-53.
5. Kahan J, Bernstein SJ, Leape LL, et al. Measuring the necessity of medical procedures. Med Care 1994; 32: 357-65.
6. Chopra V, Bovill JG, Spierdijk J, Koornneef F. Reported significant observations during anaesthesia: a prospective analysis over an 18-month period. Br J Anaesth 1992; 68: 13-7.
7. Evans C. The use of consensus methods and expert panels in pharmacoeconomic studies. Practical applications and methodological shortcomings. Pharmacoeconomics 1997; 12: 121-9.
8. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna H. Consulting the oracle: ten lessons from using the Delphi technique in nursing research. J Adv Nurs 2006; 53: 205-12.
9. Hassan F, Keeney S, McKenna H. Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. J Adv Nurs 2000; 32: 1008-15.
10. McKenna HP. The essential elements of a practitioners' nursing model: a survey of clinical psychiatric nurse managers. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 870-7.
11. Kearney RA. Defining professionalism in anaesthesiology. Med Educ 2005; 39: 769-76.
12. Streiner D. Selecting the items. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR (Eds). Health Measurement Scales. A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995: 54-68.
13. Green B, Jones M, Hughes D, Williams A. Applying the Delphi technique in a study of GPs' information requirements. Health Soc Care Community 1999; 7: 198-205.
14. Beech B. Studying the future: a Delphi survey of how multi-disciplinary clinical staff view the likely development of two community mental health centres over the course of the next two years. J Adv Nurs 1997; 25: 331-8.
15. Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, Cleave-Hogg D. The validity of performance assessments using simulation. Anesthesiology 2001; 95: 36-42.
16. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg D, DeSousa S, Tarshis J. High-fidelity patient simulation: validation of performance checklists. Br J Anaesth 2004; 92: 388-92.
17. Morgan PJ, Cleave-Hogg DM, Guest CB, Herold J. Validity and reliability of undergraduate performance assessments in an anesthesia simulator. Can J Anesth 2001; 48: 225-33.
18. Williams PL, Webb C. The Delphi technique: a methodological discussion. J Adv Nurs 1994; 19: 180-6.
19. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Validity. In: Streiner DL, Norman GR (Eds). Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995: 144-62.
20. Devitt JH, Kurrek MM, Cohen MM, et al. Testing the raters: inter-rater reliability of standardized anaesthesia simulator performance. Can J Anaesth 1997; 44: 924-8.
21. Keeney S, Hasson F, McKenna HP. A critical review of the Delphi technique as a research methodology for nursing. Int J Nurs Stud 2001; 38: 195-200.
22. Jairath N, Weinstein J. The Delphi methodology (part one): a useful administrative approach. Can J Nurs Adm 1994; 7: 29-42.