Towards ecological goals for the heavily modified lakes in the IJsselmeer area, the Netherlands

Hydrobiologia

Volumn 599, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 239-247

  Lammens, Eddy ^a   Van Luijn, Francien ^b   Wessels, Yolanda ^c   Bouwhuis, Harry ^d   Noordhuis, Ruurd ^a   Portielje, Rob ^a   Van Der Molen, Diederik ^a  

^a INST INLAND WATER MGMT WASTE W   (Netherlands)

^b RWS Directie IJsselmeergebied   (Netherlands)

^c AquaSense Ltd   (Netherlands)

^d Oranjewoud   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Chlorophyll a; Ecological condition; Fish; Fishery; Human pressures; Macrophytes; Measures; Nutrients; Transparency; Water Framework Directive; Water management

Indexed keywords

CHLOROPHYLL; ECOLOGY; FISH; NUTRIENTS; WATER MANAGEMENT;

ECOLOGICAL CONDITION; HUMAN PRESSURES; MACROPHYTES; WATER FRAMEWORK DIRECTIVE;

LAKES;

AGRICULTURAL LAND; CHLOROPHYLL A; COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DRINKING WATER; EUROPEAN UNION; LEGISLATION; RIVER BASIN; STAKEHOLDER; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATER SUPPLY; WATER TABLE;

BENELUX; EURASIA; EUROPE; IJSSELMEER; NETHERLANDS; WESTERN EUROPE;

ALGAE; HYPEROGLYPHE POROSA;

EID: 38849099767     PISSN: 00188158     EISSN: 15735117     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-007-9202-2     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Breukelaar A. W., E. H. R. R. Lammens, J. G. P. Klein-Breteler & I. Tatrai, 1996. Effects of benthivorous bream (Abramis brama) and carp (Cyprinus carpio) on sediment resuspension and the concentrations of nutrients and chlorophyll-a. Freshwater Biology 32: 113-121.
2. Brouwer G. A. & L. Tinbergen, 1939. The distribution of the mute swans, Cygnus b. bewickii Yarr. In the Southern Sea before and after the closure of the Afsluitdijk. Limosa 12: 1-18.
3. Cremer, H. & F. P. M. Bunnik, 2006. Estimating the nutrient concentration of the IJsselmeer since the origin of the lake in 1932. TNO-report 2006-U-R0133B.
4. De Beaufort, L. F., 1954. Changes in the flora and fauna of the Southern Sea (now IJsselmeer) after the closure in 1932. Nederlands Dierkundige Vereniging, Den Helder.
5. Directive, 2000. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy.
6. ECOSTAT, 2003. Overall Approach to the Classification of Ecological Status and Ecological Potential, Working Group 2 A, Ecological Status (ECOSTAT).
7. Guidance, 2003. Guidance Document No. 4 Identification and Designation of Heavily Modified and Artificial Water Bodies-HMWB (2003), Final, CIS Working Group 2.2 on Heavily Modified Water Bodies, 14 January 2003.
8. Gulati, R. D., E. H. R. R. Lammens, M.-L. Meyer & E. van Donk, 1990. Biomanipulation, Tool for Water Management. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
9. Haberman, J., A. Jaani, A. Kangur, K. Kangur, R. Laugaste, A. Milius, H. Mäemets & E. Pihu, 2000. Lake Peipsi and its ecosystem. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology/Ecology 49: 3-18.
10. Heinis, F. & C. H. M. Evers, 2007. Establishing GES values for nutrients in natural water bodies. RIZA Nota 2007.001.
11. Ibelings, B. W., R. Portielje, E. Lammens, M. L. Meijer, R. Noordhuis, M. S. van den Berg, W. Joosse & M. Scheffer, 2007. Resilience of alternative stable states during the recovery of shallow lakes from eutrophication. Ecosystems 10: 4-16.
12. Irmer, U. & P. Pollard, 2006. Alternative Methodology for Defining Good Ecological Potential (GEP) for Heavily Modified Water Bodies (HMWB) and Artificial Water Bodies (AWB). ECOSTAT, Ispra.
13. Jaarsma, N. & M. Klinge, 2005. Empirical relationships between the fish composition and water quality parameters in lakes. Rw1447-2. Witteveen + Bos.
14. Lammens, E. H. R. R., E. H. van Nes & W. M. Mooij, 2002. Differences in exploitation of the bream population in three shallow lake systems and their relation to water quality. Freshwater Biology 47: 2435-2442.
15. Lammens, E. H. R. R., E. H. van Nes, M.-L. Meijer & M. S. van den Berg, 2004. Effects of commercial fishery on the bream population and the expansion of Chara aspera in Lake Veluwe. Ecological Modelling 177: 233-244.
16. Middelboe, A. L. & S. Markager, 1997. Depth limits and minimum light requirements of freshwater macrophytes. Freshwater Biology 37: 553-568.
17. Portielje, R., C. Schipper & M. Schoor (eds), 2005. Effects of hydromorphological pressures on the ecological water quality elements of the WFD. Report, RIZA/2005.098X, RIKZ/2005.
18. Pihu, E. & A. Kangur, 2000. Main changes in the ichtyocoenosis of lake Peipsi since the 1950s. Proceedings of the Estonian Academy of Sciences. Biology/ Ecology 49: 81-91.
19. Søndergaard, M., E. Jeppesen, T. Lauridsen, C. Skov, E. H. Van Nes, R. Roijackers, E. H. R. R. Lammens & R. Portielje, 2007. Lake restoration: successes, failures and long-term effects. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 1095-1105.
20. Van der Molen, D. T. & R. Pot (eds), 2006. Referenties en concept-maatlatten voor meren voor de Kaderrichtlijn Water. STOWA-Report 2004-42a. STOWA, Utrecht.
21. Van Nes E. H., E. H. R. R. Lammens & M. Scheffer, 2002. PISCATOR, an individual-based model to analyze the dynamics of lake fish communities. Ecological Modelling 152: 261-278.
22. Vulink, J. T. & M. R. van Eerden, 1998. Hydrological conditions and herbivory as key operators for ecosystem development in Dutch artificial wetlands. In Wallis DeVries, M. F., J. P. Bakker & S. E. Van Wieren (eds), Grazing and Conservation Management. Kluwer Academic publishers, Dordrecht: 217-252.