Assortative mating between European corn borer pheromone races: Beyond assortative meeting

PLoS ONE

Volumn 2, Issue 6, 2007, Pages

  Pélozuelo, Laurent ^a   Meusnier, Serge ^b   Audiot, Philippe ^b   Bourguet, Denis ^b   Ponsard, Sergine ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b CENTRE DE BIOLOGIE ET DE GESTION DES POPULATIONS   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SEX PHEROMONE; PHEROMONE;

ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; AUTOSOME; CONTROLLED STUDY; EUROPEAN CORN BORER; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; MATING SUCCESS; MOTH; NONHUMAN; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; STRAIN DIFFERENCE; UNITED STATES; ANIMAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CROSS BREEDING; DECISION MAKING; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION GENETICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

LEPIDOPTERA; OSTRINIA NUBILALIS;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CROSSES, GENETIC; FEMALE; FRANCE; GENETICS, POPULATION; MALE; MOTHS; PHEROMONES; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38849098282     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0000555     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Byers J (2005) Chemical constraints on the evolution of olfactory communication channels of moths. J Theor Biol 235: 199-206.
2. Sperling F, Hickey D (1995) Amplified mitochondrial DNA as a diagnostic marker for species of conifer-feeding Choristoneura (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Can Entomol 127: 277-288.
3. Haynes K (1997) Genetics of pheromone communication in the cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. In: Cardé R, Minks A, eds. Insect pheromone research - New directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp 525-534.
4. Newcomb RD, Gleeson DM (1998) Pheromone evolution within the genera Ctenopseutis and Planotortrix (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) inferred from a phylogey based on cytochrome oxidase I gene variation. Biochem Syst Ecol 26: 473-484.
5. Roelofs W, Brown R (1982) Pheromones and evolutionary relationships of tortricidae. Ann Rev Ecol Syst 13: 395-422.
6. Löfstedt C (1993) Moth pheromone genetics and evolution. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 340: 167-177.
7. Löfstedt C, Van Der Pers JNC (1985) Sex pheromones and reproductive isolation in four European small ermine moths. J Chem Ecol 11: 649-666.
8. Dugdale J (1997) Pheromone and morphology-based phylogenies in New Zealand Tortricid moths. In: Cardé R, Minks A, eds. Insect pheromone research - New directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp 463-472.
9. Löfstedt C, Herrebout W, Du J-W (1986) Evolution of the ermine moth pheromone tetradecyl acetate. Nature 323: 621-623.
10. Löfstedt C, Herrebout W, Menken S (1991) Sex pheromones and their potential role in the evolution of reproductive isolation in small ermine moths (Yponomeutidae). Chemoecology 2: 20-28.
11. Foster S, Muggleston S, Löfstedt C, Hansson B (1997) A genetic study on pheromonal communication in two Ctenopseustis moths. In: Cardé R, Minks A, eds. Insect pheromone research - New directions. New York. Chapman & Hall. pp 514-524.
12. Emelianov I, Dres M, Baltensweiler W, Mallet J (2001) Host-induced assortative mating in host races of the larch budmoth. Evolution 55: 2002-2010.
13. Roelof W, Rooney A (2003) Molecular genetics and evolution of pheromone biosynthesis in Lepidoptera. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100: 9179-9184.
14. Zhu J, Chastain BB, Spohan BG, Haynes KF (1997) Assortative mating in two pheromone strains ofthe cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Insect Behav 10: 805-817.
15. Eshel I, Cavalli-Sforza LL (1982) Assortment of encounters and evolution of cooperativeness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 79: 1331-1335.
16. Paterson H (1978) Mort evidence against speciation by reinforcement. S Afr J of Sci 74: 369-371.
17. White C, Lambert D, Foster S (1995) Chemical signals and the recognition. concept. In: Lambert D, Spencer H, eds. Speciation and the recognition concept - Theory and Application Johns Hopkins University Press.
18. Coyne JA, Orr RA (2004) Speciation. Sunderland, Massachusetts (USA): Sinauer Associates.
19. Butlin RK, Trickett AJ (1997) Can population genetics help to interpret pheromone evolution? In: Cardé R, Minks A, eds. Insect pheromone research - New directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp 548-562.
20. Klun JA, Chapman O, Mattes K, Wojtkowski P, Beroza K et al. (1973) Insect sex pheromones: minor amount of opposite geometrical isomer critical to attraction. Science 181: 661-663.
21. Kochansky J, Cardé RT, Liebherr J, Roelofs WL (1975) Sex pheromone of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), in New York. J Chem Ecol 1: 225-231.
22. Roelofs W, Glower TJ, Tang X-H, Sreng I, Robbins P, et al. (1987) Sex pheromone production and perception in European corn borer moths is determined by both autosomal and sex-linked genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 84: 7585-7589.
23. Löfstedt C, Hansson BS, Roelofs W, Bengtsson BO (1989) No linkage between genes controlling female pheromone production and male pheromone response in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera; Pyralidae). Genetics 123: 553-556.
24. Klun JA, Maini S (1979) Genetic basis of an insect chemical communication system: the European corn borer. Environ Entomol 8: 423-426.
25. Dopman EB, Bogdanovicz SM, Harrison RG (2004) Genetic mapping of sexual isolation between E and Z pheromone strains of the Europian corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis). Genetics 167: 301-309.
26. Hansson B, Löfstedt C, Roelofs W (1987) Inheritance olfactory response to sex pheromone components in Ostrinia nubilalis. Naturwissenschaften 74: 497-499.
27. Linn C, Young M, Gendle M, Glover T, Roelofs W (1997) Sex pheromone blend discrimination in two races and hybrids of the European corn borer moth, Ostrinia nubilalis. Physiol Entomol 22: 212-223.
28. Cardé R, Kochansky J, Stimmel J, Wheeler A, Roelofs W (1975) Sex pheromones of the European corn borer (Ostrinia nubilalis): cisu- and trans- responding males in Pennsylvania. Environ Entomol 4: 413-414.
29. Sorenson CF., Kennedy GG, Schal C, Walgenbach JF (2005) Geographical variation in pheromone response of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Crambidae), in North Carolina: a 20-year perspective. Environ Entomol.34: 1057-1062.
30. Thomas Y, Bethenod M-T, Pélozuelo L, Frérot B, Bourguet D (2003) Genetic isolation between host plant races of the European corn borer. I - Sex pheromone, moth emergence timing and parasitism. Evolution 57: 261-273.
31. Pélozuelo L, Malosse C, Genestier G, Guenego H, Frerot B (2004) Host-plant specialization in pheromone strains of the European Corn Borer Ostrinia nubilalis in France. J of Chem Ecol 30: 335-351.
32. Bontemps A, Bourguet D, Pélozuelo L, Bethenod M-T, Ponsard S (2004) Managing the evolution of Bacillus thuringiensis resistance in natural populations of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: host plant, host race and phenotype of adult males at aggregation sites. Proc 'R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 271: 2179-2185.
33. Peña A, Am H, Buser H-R, Rahscher S, Bigler F, et al. (1988) Sex pheromone of European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis: Polymorphism in various laboratory and field strains. J of Chem Ecol 14: 1359-1366.
34. Glover TJ, Tang XM, Roelofs WL (1987) Sex pheromone blend discrimination by male moths from E and Z strains of European corn borer. J Chem Ecol 13: 143-151.
35. Glover T, Campbell M, Robbins P, Roelofs W (1990) Sex-linked control of sex pheromone behavioral responses in European corn-boren moths ( Ostrinia nubilalis) confirmed with TPI marker gene. Arch Insect Biothem Physiol 15: 67-77.
36. Glover T, Knodel J, Robbins P, Eckenrode C, Roelofs W (1991) Gene flow among three races of European corn borers (Lepidopteras Pyralidae) in New-York State. Environ Entomol 20.
37. Malausa T, 'Bethenod M-T, Bontemps A, Bourguet D, Cornuet D, et al. (2005) Assortative mating in sympatric host races of the European corn borer. Science 208: 258-260.
38. Cardé R, Roelofs W, Harrison R, Vawter A, Brussard P, et al. (1978) European corn borer: pheromone polymorphism or sibling species? Science 199: 555-556.
39. Harrison RG, Vawter AT (1977) Allozyme differentiation between pheromone strains of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 70: 717-720.
40. Dopman E, Pérez L, Bogdanovicz S, Harrison R (2005) Consequences of reproductive barriers for genealogical discordance in the European corn borer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102: 14706-14711.
41. Bourguet D, Bethenod MT, Trouvé C, Viard F (2000) Host-plant diversity of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis: what value for sustainable transgenic insecticidal Bt maize? Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 267: 1177-1184.
42. Martel C, Rejasse A, Rousset F, Bethenod M-T, Bourguet D (2003) Host-plant associated genetic differentiation in Northern French populations of the European corn borer. Heredity 90: 141-149.
43. Wizgall P, Priesner E (1991) Wind tunnel study on attraction inhibitor in male Coleophora laricella Hbn. (Lepidoptera: Coleophoridae). J Chem Ecol 17: 1355-1362.
44. Liu YB, Haynes KF (1992) Filamentous nature of pheromone plumes protects integrity of signal from background chemical noise in cabbage looper moth, Trichoplusia ni. J Chem Ecol 18: 299-30759.
45. Valeur PG, Löfstedt C (1996) Behaviour of male of Oriental fruit moth, Grapholita molesta, in overlapping sex pheromone plumes in a wind tunnel. Entomol Exp Appl 79: 51-59.
46. Coracini M, Bengtsson M, Cichon L, Witzgall P (2003) Codling moth males do not discriminate between pheromone and a pheromone/antagonist blend during tupwind flight. Naturwissenschaften 90: 419-423.
47. Showers WB, Reed GL, Robinson JF, Derozari MB (1976) Flight and sexual activity of the European corn borer. Environ Entomol 5: 1099-1101.
48. Liebherr J, Roelofs W (1975) Laboratory hybridization and mating period studies using two pheromone stinins of Ostrinia nubilalis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 68: 304-309.
49. Bethenod M-T, Thomas Y, Rousset F, Frérot B, Pélozuelo L, et al. (2005) Genetic isolation between two sympatric host plant races of the European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner. II- assortative mating and host plant preferences for oviposition. J Heredity 94: 2264-270.
50. Teal P, Tumlinson, J (1997) Effects of interspecific hybridization between Heliothis virescens and Heliothis subflexa on the sex pheromone communication system. In: Cardé R, Minks A, eds (1997) Insect pheromone research - New directions. New York: Chapman & Hall. pp, 535-547.
51. Marcotte M, Delisle J, McNeil J (2003) Pheromonostasis is not directly associated with post-mating sperm dynamics in Choristoneura fianiferana and C. rasaceana females. J Insect Physiol 49: 81-90.
52. Sturtevant A (1915) No crossing over in the females of the silkworm moth. Am Nat 49: 42-44.
53. Robinson R (1971) Lepidoptera Genetics. Oxford: Pergamon press.
54. Goldsmith M, Shimada T, Abe H (2005) The genetics and genomics of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Ann Rev Entomol 50: 71-100.
55. Ellegren H (2005) The avian genome uncovered. Trend Ecol Evol 20: 180-186.
56. Zhu J, Lösftedt C, Bengtsson BO (1996) Genetic variation, in the strongly canalized sex pheromone communication system of the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis Hübner (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Genetica 144: 757-766.
57. Hartigan P (1985) Computation of the dip statistic to test for unimodality. Applied Statistics 34: 320-325.
58. Bartels DW, Hutchison WD, Udayagiri S (1997) Pheromone trap monitoring of Z strain European corn borer (Lepidoptera: pyralidae): optimum pheromone blend, comparison with blacklight traps, and trap number requirement. J Econ Entomol 90: 449-457.
59. Ngollo ED, Groden E, Dill JF, Handley DT (2000) Monitoring of the European corn borer (Lepidoptera: Crambidae) in central Maine. J Econo Entomol 93: 256-263.
60. Takanashi T, Huang Y, Takahasi W Hoshizald S, Tatsuki S, et al. (2005) Genetic analysis and population survey of sex pheromone variation in the adzuki bean borer moth, Ostrinia seapulabs. Biol J Linn Soc 84: 143-160.
61. Corntord ME, Rowley WA, Klun JA (1973) Scanning election microscopy of antennal sensilla of the european corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis. Ann Entomol Soc Am 66: 1079-1088.
62. Nagai T, Starratt AN, Mc Leod DGR, Driscoll GR (1977) Electroantennogram response ofthe European corn borer Ostrinia nubilalis to Z and E-11-tetradecenyl acetates. J Insect Physiol 23: 591-597.
63. Ferveur J-F (2005) Cuticular hydrocarbons: Their evolution and rules in Drosophila phenomenal communication. Behavior Genetics 35: 279-295.
64. Lassance J-M, Töfstedt C 0 Male odour drives female choice in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera Crambidae) 22nd Annual Meeting, International Society of Chemical Ecology; 2006 15-19th July, Barcelona, Spain. 151.
65. Royer L, McNeil JN (1992) Evidense of a male sex-pheromone in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner) (Lepidoptera, Pyralidae). Canadian Entomologist 124: 113-116.
66. Nakano R, Ishikawa Y, Tatsuki S, Surlykke A, Skals N, et al. (2006) Ultrasonic courtship song in the sian corn borer moth, Ostrinia funacalis. Naturwissenschaften 93: 292-296.
67. Schlaepfer MA, McNeil JM (2000) Are virgin maic Lepidopterans more successful in mate acquisition than previously mated individuals? A study of die European com borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 78: 2045-2050.
68. Gahukar RT (1975) Nouvelles techiques adoptees pour l'élevage d' Ostrinia nubilalis Hubner sur milieu artificiel. Ann Zool Ecol Anim 7: 491-498.
69. Royer L, McNeil JN (1993) Male investment in the European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae): impact on female longevity and reproductive performance. Funct Ecol 7: 209-215.
70. Fisher R (1932) Statistical Methods for Research Workers. Edinburgh: Oliver and Boyd.
71. Whitlock M (2005) Combining probability from independent tests: the weighted Z-method is superior to Fisher's approach. J Evol Biol 18: 1368-1373.