Effects of detectability on estimates of geographic range size in Bignonieae

Conservation Biology

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 200-211

  Sheth, Seema Nayan ^a   Lohmann, Lúcia G ^a,b   Consiglio, Trisha ^a   Jiménez, Iván ^a  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Area of occupancy; Bignoniaceae; Bignonieae; Collection bias; Extent of occurrence; Geographic range size; Herbarium specimens; Species detectability

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; DATA SET; EXTINCTION RISK; HERBARIUM; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; RANGE SIZE;

ARTICLE; BIGNONIACEAE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; PHYSIOLOGY; SPECIES EXTINCTION;

BIGNONIACEAE; DEMOGRAPHY; ECOSYSTEM; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL;

BIGNONIACEAE;

EID: 38849091349     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00858.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evolutionary Ecology Research 1 : 895 909.
2. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson. 2002. Model selection and inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer-Verlag, New York.
3. Cam, E., J. D. Nichols, J. E. Hines, J. R. Sauer, R. Alpizar-Jara, and C. H. Flather. 2002. Disentangling sampling and ecological explanations underlying species-area relationships. Ecology 83 : 1118 1130.
4. Crawley, M. J. 2002. Statistical computing: an introduction to data analysis using S-Plus. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
5. Draper, N. R., and H. Smith. 1998. Applied regression analysis. 3rd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
6. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 1996. Avenue: customization and application development for ArcView. ESRI, Redlands, California.
7. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 1999. ArcView GIS 3.2. ESRI, Redlands, California.
8. ESRI (Environmental Systems Research Institute). 2005. ArcGIS 9.1. ESRI, Redlands, California.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. The American Naturalist 125 : 1 15.
10. Fisher, D. O., and I. P. F. Owens. 2004. The comparative method in conservation biology. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19 : 391 398.
11. Garland, T., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Systematic Biology 41 : 18 32.
12. Gaston, K. J. 1994. Measuring geographic range sizes. Ecography 17 : 198 205.
13. Gaston, K. J. 2003. The structure and dynamics of geographic ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
14. Gaston, K. J., R. M. Quinn, S. W. Wood, and H. R. Arnold. 1996. Measures of geographic range size: the effects of sample size. Ecography 19 : 259 268.
15. Gaston, K. J., T. M. Blackburn, J. J. D. Greenwood, R. D. Gregory, R. M. Quinn, and J. H. Lawton. 2000. Abundance-occupancy relationships. Journal of Applied Ecology 37 : 39 59.
16. Gentry, A. H. 1974. Coevolutionary patterns in Central American Bignoniaceae. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61 : 728 759.
17. IUCN (World Conservation Union). 2006. The IUCN red list of threatened species. Summary statistics for globally threatened species. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://www.iucnredlist.org/info/stats (accessed August 2006).
18. Kéry, M., and K. B. Gregg. 2003. Effects of life-state on detectability in a demographic study of the terrestrial orchid Cleistes bifaria. Journal of Ecology 91 : 265 273.
19. Kolb, A., F. Barsch, and M. Diekmann. 2006. Determinants of local abundance and range size in forest vascular plants. Global Ecology and Biogeography 15 : 237 247.
20. Lohmann, L. G. 2003. Phylogeny, classification, morphological diversification and biogeography of Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae, Lamiales). PhD thesis. University of Missouri, St. Louis.
21. Lohmann, L. G. 2006. Untangling the phylogeny of Neotropical lianas (Bignonieae, Bignoniaceae). American Journal of Botany 93 : 304 318.
22. Lohmann, L. G. 2008. A new generic classification of Bignonieae (Bignoniaceae) based on molecular phylogenetic data and morphological synapomorphies. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden : In press.
23. MacKenzie, D. I., J. D. Nichols, J. A. Royle, K. H. Pollock, L. L. Bailey, and J. E. Hines. 2005. Occupancy estimation and modeling: inferring patterns and dynamics of species occurrence. Elsevier, Amsterdam.
24. McKinney, M. L. 1997. How do rare species avoid extinction? A paleontological view. Pages 110 129 in W. E. Kunin and K. J. Gaston, editors. The biology of rarity: causes and consequences of rare-common differences. Chapman Hall, London.
25. Maddison, W. P., and D. R. Maddison. 2006. Mesquite: a modular system for evolutionary analysis. Version 1.1. Available from http://mesquiteproject.org (accessed August 2006).
26. Midford, P. E., T. Garland Jr., and W. P. Maddison. 2005. PDAP package of Mesquite. Version 1.07. Available from http://mesquiteproject.org/ pdap_mesquite/index.html (accessed August 2006).
27. Parnell, J. A. N., et al. 2003. Plant collecting spread and densities: their potential impact on biogeographical studies in Thailand. Journal of Biogeography 30 : 193 209.
28. R Development Core Team. 2006. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Vienna University of Economics and Business Administration, Vienna. Available from http://www.R-project.org (accessed August 2006).
29. Reed, J. M. 1996. Using statistical probability to increase confidence of inferring species extinction. Conservation Biology 10 : 1283 1285.
30. Reeve, J., and E. Abouheif. 2003. Phylogenetic independence. Version 2.0. Available from http://biology.mcgill.ca/faculty/abouheif/ (accessed August 2006).
31. Schatz, G. E. 2002. Taxonomy and herbaria in service of plant conservation: lessons from Madagascar's endemic families. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 89 : 145 152.
32. Schatz, G. E., C. Birkinshaw, P. P. Lowry, F. Randriantafika, and F. Ratovoson. 2000. The endemic plant families of Madagascar project: integrating taxonomy and conservation. Pages 11 24 in W. R. Lourenco and S. M. Goodman, editors. Diversité et Endémisme à Madagascar. Mémoires de la Societé de Biogéographie, Paris.
33. Standards and Petitions Working Group. 2006. Guidelines for using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 6.1. World Conservation Union SSC Biodiversity Assessments Sub-Committee, Gland, Switzerland. Available from http://app.iucn.org/webfiles/doc/SSC/RedList/RedListGuidelines.pdf (accessed August 2006).
34. Willis, F., J. Moat, and A. Paton. 2003. Defining a role for herbarium data in Red List assessments: a case study of Plectranthus from eastern and southern tropical Africa. Biodiversity and Conservation 12 : 1537 1552.
35. Wright, D. H. 1991. Correlations between incidence and abundance are expected by chance. Journal of Biogeography 18 : 463 466.