Joint replacement recipients' post-surgery views about health information privacy and registry participation

Health Policy

Volumn 85, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 293-304

  Terry, Amanda L ^a   Chesworth, Bert M ^b   Stolee, Paul ^c,d   Bourne, Robert B ^d   Speechley, Mark ^d  

^a WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b School of Physical Therapy and Bachelor   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health information privacy; Joint replacement recipients; Patient registries; Patients' views

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BIVARIATE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIVACY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; STUDENT T TEST;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT; CONFIDENTIALITY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGISTRIES;

EID: 38749133691     PISSN: 01688510     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2007.08.002     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lowrance W. Learning from experience: privacy and the secondary use of data in health research. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 8 Suppl. 1 (2003) S1:2-S1:7
2. Slaughter P.M., Carlisle J., Williams J., and Ferris L.E. A national strategy for waiting-times research?. Canadian Medical Association Journal 172 10 (2005) 1283-1284
3. Herberts P., and Malchau H. Long-term registration has improved the quality of hip replacement. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica 71 2 (2000) 111-121
4. Wylie J.E., and Mineau G.P. Biomedical databases: protecting privacy and promoting research. Trends in Biotechnology 21 3 (2003) 113-116
5. Ingelfinger J.R., and Drazen J.M. Registry research and medical privacy. The New England Journal of Medicine 350 14 (2004) 1452-1453
6. Storm H., Brewster D.H., Coleman M.P., Deapen D., Oshima A., Threlfall T., et al. Guidelines for confidentiality and cancer registration [Letter]. British Journal of Cancer 92 (2005) 2095-2096
7. von Tigerstrom B, Deschênes M, Knoppers BM, Caulfield TA. Use of cancer patient information for surveillance purposes: a systematic review of legislation, regulations, policies and guidelines. Canadian Coalition on Cancer Surveillance; 2000. URL: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/ccdpc-cpcmc/cancer/publications/use_e.html.
8. Ward H.J.T., Cousens S.N., Smith-Bathgate B., Leitch M., Everington D., Will R.G., et al. Obstacles to conducting epidemiological research in the U.K. general population. British Medical Journal 329 (2004) 277-279
9. Nair K., Willison D., Holbrook A., and Keshavjee K. Patients' consent preferences regarding the use of their health information for research purposes: a qualitative study. Journal of Health Services Research & Policy 9 1 (2004) 22-27
10. Baker R., Shiels C., Stevenson K., Fraser R., and Stone M. What proportion of patients refuse consent to data collection from their records for research purposes?. British Journal of General Practice 50 (2000) 655-656
11. McCarthy D.B., Shatin D., Drinkard C.R., Kleinman J.H., and Gardner J.S. Medical records and privacy: empirical effects of legislation. Health Services Research 34 1 Pt. 2 (1999) 417-425
12. Woolf S.H., Rothemich S.F., Johnson R.E., and Marsland D.W. Selection bias from requiring patients to give consent to examine data for health services research. Archives of Family Medicine 9 (2000) 1111-1118
13. Yawn B.P., Yawn R.A., Geier G.R., Xia Z., and Jacobsen S.J. The impact of requiring patient authorization for use of data in medical records research. The Journal of Family Practice 47 5 (1998) 361-365
14. Hamajima N., and Tajima K. Patients' views on reference to clinical data. Journal of Epidemiology 7 1 (1997) 17-19
15. Kass N.E., Chandros Hull S., Natowicz M.R., Faden R.R., Plantinga L., Gostin L.O., et al. Medical privacy and the disclosure of personal medical information: the beliefs and experiences of those with genetic and other clinical conditions. American Journal of Medical Genetics 128A (2004) 261-270
16. Wardman L., Rout J., Ormiston P., Nagle J., Munshi S., Kirby A., et al. Patients' knowledge and expectations of confidentiality in primary health care: a quantitative study. British Journal of General Practice 50 (2000) 901-902
17. Willison D.J., Keshavjee K., Nair K., Goldsmith C., Holbrook A.M., and Computerization of Medical Practices for the Enhancement of Therapeutic Effectiveness Investigators. Patient consent preferences for research uses of information in electronic medical records: interview and survey data. British Medical Journal 326 7385 (2003)
18. Knight J.A., Sutherland H.J., Glendon G., Boyd N.F., Andrulis I.L., and The Ontario Cancer Genetics Network. Characteristics associated with participation at various stages at the Ontario site of the Cooperative Family Registry for Breast Cancer Studies. Annals of Epidemiology 12 1 (2002) 27-33
19. Phipps E., Harris D., Brown N., Harralson T., Brecher A., Polansky M., et al. Investigation of ethnic differences in willingness to enroll in a rehabilitation research registry: a study of the Northeast Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Network. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 83 12 (2004) 875-883
20. Tu J.V., Willison D.J., Silver F.L., Fang J., Richards J.A., Laupacis A., et al. Impracticability of informed consent in the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network. The New England Journal of Medicine 350 14 (2004) 1414-1421
21. Terry AL, Chesworth BM, Bourne RB, Stolee P, Speechley M. Joint replacement recipients' views about personal health information privacy and participation in registries, in preparation.
22. Masri BA, Cochrane N, Dunbar M, Duncan C, Hughes K, Kopec J, et al. Priority criteria for hip and knee replacement: addressing health service wait times - report 1 literature review - waiting, consequences & benchmarks for joint replacement. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research; 2005. URL: http://www.plexia.ca/masri/Waiting%20Report%20I%20July%2021_Final_pdf.
23. Salmon P., Hall G.M., Peerbhoy D., Shenkin A., and Parker C. Recovery from hip and knee arthroplasty: patients' perspective on pain, function, quality of life, and well-being up to 6 months postoperatively. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 82 (2001) 360-366
24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey
25. Terry A.L., Stolee P., Chesworth B.M., Bourne R.B., and Speechley M. Validation of a questionnaire for measuring patient views on their willingness to participate in registries: experience with joint replacement recipients. Journal of Registry Management 34 2 (2007) 35-39
26. Mahomed N.N., Sledge C.B., Daltroy L., Fossel A.H., and Katz J.N. Self-administered patient satisfaction scale for joint replacement arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery [BR] 80-B Suppl. 1 (1998) 9
27. Willison D. Principles for the protection of personal health information: a discussion paper. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Institute for Health Information; 1999. URL: http://secure.cihi.ca/cihiweb/en/downloads/partner_docs_e_wg3prin6.pdf.
28. Tabachnick B.G., and Fidell L.S. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. (2001), Allyn and Bacon, Boston
29. Armitage P., Berry G., and Mathews J.N.S. Statistical methods in medical research. 4th ed. (2002), Blackwell Science, Oxford
30. Hawker G.A., Wright J.G., Coyte P.C., Williams J.I., Harvey B., Glazier R., et al. Differences between men and women in the rate of use of hip and knee arthroplasty. The New England Journal of Medicine 342 14 (2000) 1016-1022
31. Ontario Joint Replacement Registry. Total Joint Replacements in Ontario: Annual Report 2004. London: Ontario Joint Replacement Registry; 2004.
32. Williamson O.D. Measuring the success of joint replacement surgery [Editorial]. The Medical Journal of Australia 171 (1999) 229-230
33. Kleinbaum D.G., Kupper L.L., Muller K.E., and Nizam A. Applied regression analysis and other multivariable methods. 3rd ed. (1998), Duxbury Press, Pacific Grove
34. Sankar P., Moran S., Merz J.F., and Jones N.L. Patient perspectives on medical confidentiality: a review of the literature. Journal of General Internal Medicine 18 (2003) 659-669