A defence of informational structural realism

Synthese

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 219-253

  Floridi, Luciano ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BARI   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Epistemic structural realism; Informational ontology; Levels of abstraction; Ontic structural realism; Structural realism

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749130883     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9163-z     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Bitbol M., (2002). "Jean-Louis Destouches' Transcendental Structuralism", One-Day Worshop "Structuralism in Twenty-Century Physics", University of Leeds, June 14
2. Bloomfield P., (2005). Let's be realistic about serious metaphysics. Synthese 144(2): 69-90
3. Brink C., Rewitzky I., (2002). Three dual ontologies. Journal of Philosophical Logic 31(6): 543-568
4. Cao T.Y., (2003). Structural realism and the interpretation of quantum field theory. Synthese 136(1): 3-24
5. Carter J., (forthcoming). Identity between and individuating objects in structures: A problem for structuralism? Synthese.
6. Chakravartty A., (1998). Semirealism. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29(3): 391-408
7. Chakravartty A., (2001). The semantic or model-theoretic view of theories and scientific realism. Synthese 127(3): 325-345
8. Chakravartty A., (2003). The structuralist conception of objects. Philosophy of Science 70(5): 867-878
9. Cruse P., & Papineau D., (2002). Scientific realism without reference. In M. Marsonet (Ed.), The problem of realism. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing Company.
10. da Costa N.C.A., French S., (2003). Science and partial truth: A unitary approach to models and reasoning in science. Oxford, Oxford University Press
11. de Roever W.-P., Engelhardt K., (1998). Data refinement: Model-oriented proof methods and their comparison. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
12. Demopoulos W., Friedman M., (1985). Critical notice: Bertrand Russell's the analysis of matter. Philosophy of Science 52, 621-639
13. Dennett D., (1991). Real patterns. Journal of Philosophy, 87, 27-51
14. (Reprinted in D. Dennett, Brainchildren. London: Penguin 1998. pp. 95-120).
15. Devitt M., (forthcoming). Scientific realism. In F. Jackson & M. Smith (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of contemporary analytic philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Dorato M., & Pauri M., (forthcoming). Holism and structuralism in classical and quantum general relativity. In S. French (Ed.), Structuralism and quantum gravity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Eddington A., (1928). The nature of the physical world. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
18. Esfeld M., (2004). Quantum entanglement and a metaphysics of relations. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 35: 625-641
19. Esfeld M., & Lam V., (forthcoming). Moderate structural realism about space-time. Synthese.
20. Floridi L., (2003a). On the intrinsic value of information objects and the infosphere. Ethics and Information Technology 4(4): 287-304
21. Floridi L., (2003b). The renaissance of epistemology: 1914-1945. In T. Baldwin (Ed.), Cambridge History of Philosophy 1870-1945. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Floridi L., (2004). On the logical unsolvability of the Gettier problem. Synthese 142(1): 61-79
23. Floridi L., (2005a). Consciousness, agents and the knowledge game. Minds and Machines 15(3-4): 415-444
24. Floridi L., (2005b). Is information meaningful data?. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70(2): 351-370
25. Floridi L., Sanders J.W., (2004a). Internet ethics: The constructionist values of homo poieticus. In: Cavalier R. (eds), The impact of the internet on our moral lives. New York, SUNY
26. Floridi L., & Sanders J.W., (2004b). Levellism and the method of abstraction. IEG Research Report 22.11.04, Oxford University, http://web.comlab.ox.ac.uk/oucl/research/areas/ieg.
27. Floridi L., & Sanders J.W., (2004b). The method of abstraction. Yearbook of the Artificial. Nature, Culture and Technology. Models in Contemporary Sciences, Oxford University, M. Negrotti (Ed.), Bern: Peter Lang, Preprint from: http://www.wolfson.ox.ac.uk/~floridi/papers.htm
28. Franklin J., (1999). Structure and domain-independence in the formal sciences. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 30(4): 721-723
29. French S., (2001). Symmetry, structure and the constitution of objects. Symmetries in Physics, New Reflections: Oxford Workshop, January 2001, Oxford.
30. French S., (2003). Scribbling on the blank sheet: Eddington's structuralist conception of objects. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 227-259
31. French S., Kamminga H., (eds) (1993). Correspondence, invariance and heuristics. Essays in honour of Heinz Post. Dordrecht, Kluwer
32. French S., Ladyman J., (2003a). The dissolution of objects: Between platonism and phenomenalism. Synthese 136(1): 73-77
33. French S., Ladyman J., (2003b). Remodelling structural realism: Quantum physics and the metaphysics of structure. Synthese 136(1): 31-56
34. French S., Redhead M., (1988). Quantum mechanics and the identity of the indiscernibles. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39, 233-246
35. French S., & Saatsi J., (2004). Realism about structure: The semantic view and non-linguistic representations. Proceedings Philosophy of Science Assoc. 19th Biennial Meeting-PSA2004: PSA 2004 Symposia.
36. Gower B., (2000). Cassirer, Schlick and 'Structural' realism: The philosophy of the exact sciences in the background to early logical empiricism. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 8(1): 71-106
37. Hacking I., (1999). The social construction of what?. Cambridge, Mass, Harvard University Press
38. Hayes I., Flinn B., (1993). Specification case studies (2nd ed). New York, London, Prentice Hall
39. Heath A.E., (1928). Contribution to the symposium "Materialism in the Light of Scientific Thought". Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplement, 8, 130-142
40. Hoare C.A.R., He J., (1998), Unifying theories of programming. London, Prentice Hall
41. Ketland J., (2004). Empirical adequacy and ramsification. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 55(2): 287-300
42. Krause D., (2005). Structures and structural realism. Logic Journal of the IGPL 13(1): 113-126
43. Ladyman J., (1998). What is structural realism?. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 29A(3): 409-424
44. Langton R., (2004). Elusive knowledge of things in themselves. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82(1): 129-136
45. Laudan L., (1981). A confutation of convergent realism. Philosophy of Science 48, 19-48
46. Lewis D., (forthcoming). Ramseyan humility. In D. Braddon-Mitchell, & R. Nola (Eds.), The Canberra plan
47. (Preprint in Lewis (2001), Ramseyan Humility, University of Melbourne Philosophy Department Preprint 1/01).
48. Maxwell G., (1968). Scientific methodology and the causal theory of perception. In: Lakatos I., Musgrave A. (eds), Problems in the philosophy of science. Amsterdam, North-Holland Publishing Company, pp. 148-160
49. Maxwell G., (1970a). Structural realism and the meaning of theoretical terms. In: Winokur S., Radner M., (eds), Analyses of theories, and methods of physics and psychology. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press, pp. 181-192
50. Maxwell G., (1970b). Theories, perception and structural realism. In: Colodny R. (eds), Nature and function of scientific theories. Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Press, pp. 3-34
51. Morganti M., (2004). On the preferability of epistemic structural realism. Synthese 142(1): 81-107
52. Newman M., (2004). Ramsey-sentence realism as an answer to the pessimistic meta-induction. Proceedings Philosophy of Science Assoc. 19th Biennial Meeting-PSA2004: PSA 2004 Contributed Papers.
53. Newman M.H.A. (1928). Mr. Russell's "Causal Theory of Perception". Mind 37: 137-148
54. Parsons C., (2004). Structuralism and metaphysics. The Philosophical Quarterly 54(214): 56-77
55. Poincaré H. (1902). Science and hypothesis (repr. in 1952). New York: Dover.
56. Psillos S., (1999), Scientific realism : How science tracks truth. London, Routledge
57. Psillos S., (2000a). Carnap, the Ramsey-sentence and realistic empiricism. Erkenntnis 52, 253-279
58. Psillos S., (2000b). The present state of the scientific realism debate. British Journal for Philosophy of Science 51(Special Supplement): 705-728
59. Psillos S., (2001). Is structural realism possible? Philosophy of Science (Supplement) 68(3): 13-24
60. Psillos S., (2004). The structure, the whole structure and nothing but the structure? Proceedings Philosophy of Science Assoc. 19th Biennial Meeting-PSA2004: PSA 2004 Symposia.
61. Putnam H., (1975). What is mathematical truth? Mathematics, matter and method, philosophical papers (Vol. 1, pp. 60-78). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Quine W.V., (1939). A logistical approach to the ontological problem. Fifth International Congress for the Unity of Science, Cambridge, MA
63. repr. in The Ways of Paradox and Other Essays (New York: Random House, 1966), 64-9.
64. Quine W.V., (1992). Structure and nature. Journal of Philosophy 89(1): 5-9
65. Reck E.H., (2003). Dedekind's structuralism: An interpretation and partial defense. Synthese 137(3): 369-419
66. Reck E.H., Price M.P., (2000). Structures and structuralism in contemporary philosophy of mathematics. Synthese 125(3): 341-383
67. Rosen G., Smith N.J.J. (2004). Wordly Indeterminacy: A rough guide. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82(1): 185-198
68. Rumbaugh J., (1991). Object-oriented modeling and design. Englewood Cliffs, London, Prentice-Hall International
69. Ryckman T.A., (2003). Surplus structure from the standpoint of transcendental idealism: The "World Geometries" of Weyl and Eddington. Perspectives on Science 11(1): 76-106
70. Saunders S., (2003). Structural realism, again. Synthese 136(1): 127-133
71. Sellars W., (1956). Empiricism and the philosophy of mind. In H. Feigl & M. Scriven (Eds.), Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
72. Shapiro S., (2004). Foundations of mathematics: Metaphysics, epistemology, structure. The Philosophical Quarterly 54(214): 16-37
73. Spivey J.M., (1992). The Z notation: A reference manual (2nd ed). New York, London, Prentice-Hall
74. Suárez M., (2003). Scientific representation: Against similarity and isomorphism. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 17(3): 225-244
75. Van Fraasen B.C., (forthcoming). Representation: The problem for structuralism. Philosophy of Science.
76. Van Fraassen B.C., (2006). Structure: Its shadow and substance. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57(2): 275-307
77. Votsis I., (2003). Is structure not enough?. Philosophy of Science, Supplement 70(5): 879-890
78. Votsis I., (forthcoming). Dispelling certain misconceptions about structural realism.
79. Wallace D., (2003). Everett and Structure. Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 34, 87-105
80. Wheeler J.A., (1990). Information, physics, quantum: The search for links. In W. H. Zureck (Ed.), Complexity, entropy and the physics of information. Redwood City, Cal: Addison Wesley.
81. Wiener N., (1961). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. New York, John Wiley
82. Worrall J., (1989). Structural realism: The best of both worlds?. Dialectica 43, 99-124
83. Worrall J., (1994). How to remain (Reasonably) optimistic: Scientific realism and the "Luminiferous Ether". In D. L. Hull M., Forbes, & R. M. Burian (Eds.), Psa 1994 (pp. 334-342). East Lansing, MI: Philosophy of Science Association.
84. Worrall J., & Zahar E., (2001). Appendix Iv: Ramseyfication and structural realism. In Poincare's philosophy: From conventionalism to phenomenology. Chicago and La Salle (IL): Open Court.