Effect of natural windbreaks on maximum odour dispersion distance (MODD)

Canadian Biosystems Engineering / Le Genie des biosystems au Canada

Volumn 49, Issue , 2007, Pages

  Lin, X J ^a   Barrington, S ^a   Nicell, J ^b   Choiniere D ^c  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c Environmental Service Director   (Canada)

Author keywords

MODD; Odour dispersion; Optical porosity; Separation distance; Tree type; Wind direction and speed; Windbreak

Indexed keywords

BUTENES; PARTICULATE EMISSIONS; POPULATION DYNAMICS; POROSITY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

MAXIMUM ODOUR DISPERSION DISTANCE (MODD); ODOUR PLUMES; OPTICAL POROSITY;

ODOR REMOVAL;

EID: 38749129128     PISSN: 14929058     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. ASHRAE. 2003. Handbook of Fundamentals, Chapter 12. Atlanta, GA: American Society of Heating Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Engineering. Atlanta.
2. ASTM. 1990. Standard Method for Defining and Calculating Sensory Thresholds from Intermediate Size. AWMA E 18.04.25. Washington, DC: American Society for the Testing of Materials.
3. ASTM. 1997. Standard Practice for Determination of Odor and Taste Thresholds By a Forced-Choice Ascending Concentration Series Method of Limits. Washington, DC: American Society for the Testing of Materials.
4. ASTM. 1998. Standard Practices for Referencing Suprathreshold Odour Intensity. Washington, DC: American Society for the Testing of Materials.
5. Bottcher, R.W., R.D. Munilla, K.M. Keener and R.S. Gates. 2001. Dispersion of livestock building ventilation using windbreaks and ducts. ASAE Paper No. 01-4071. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
6. CEN. 1995a. Document 064/e - Odour concentration measurement by dynamic olfactometry. CEN TC 264/WG2. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Dusseldorf, Germany.
7. CEN. 1995b. Odour Standards. CEN/TC 264N 134. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Dusseldorf, Germany.
8. CEN. 2001. Air quality - determination of odour concentration by dynamic olfactometry. prEN13725. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium, http://www.aerox.nl/images/eurstandard.pdf (2006/12/18).
9. Choinière, D. and S. Barrington. 1998. The conception of an automated dynamic olfactometer. CSAE/SCGR Paper No. 98-208. Winnipeg, MB: CSBE/SCGAB
10. Cue, R.I. 2006. Statistical methods AEMA-610. http://animsci.agrenv. mcgill.ca/servers/anbreed/statisticsII/stats2e.pdf (2006/12/18).
11. Edeogun, I., J.J.R. Feddes, G. Qu, R. Coleman and J. Leonard. 2001. Odour measurement and emissions from pig manure treatment/storage systems. Final report to Canada Pork Council. Project Number CPC-01. University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB. http://www.cpc-ccp.com/HEMS/CPC-01_Feddes.PDF (2007/01/17).
12. Eimern, J., R. Karschon, L.A. Razumova and G.W. Robertson. 1964. Windbreaks and shelterbelts. Report of a working group of the Commission for Agricultural Meteorology, World Meteorological Organization, Technical Note No. 59. Secretariat of the World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
13. Guan, D., Y. Zhang and T. Zhu. 2003. A wind-tunnel study of windbreak drag. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 118: 75-84.
14. Guo, H., L.D. Jacobson, D.R. Schmidt and R.E. Nicolai. 2001. Calibrating inpuff-2 model by resident-panelists for long-distance odor dispersion from animal production sites. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 17(6): 859-868.
15. Heisler, G.M. and D.R. Dewalle. 1988. Effects of windbreak structure on wind flow. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22-23: 41-69.
16. Leuty, T. 2003. Using shelterbelt to reduce odors associated with livestock production barns. ONTARIO Ministry of Agriculture and Food, Ontario, Toronto, ON. http://www.omafra.gov.on.ca/english/crops/facts/info_odours.htm (2006/12/18).
17. Leuty, T. 2004. Wind management can reduce offensive farm odours. Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and food, Totonto, ON. http://www.gov.on.ca/OMAFRA/ english/crops/facts/info_windmanagement.htm (2005/02/01).
18. Lim, T.T., A.J. Heber, J.Q. Ni, A.L. Sutton and D.T. Kelly. 2001. Characteristics and emission rates of odour from commercial swine nurseries. Transaction of the ASAE 44 (5): 1275-1282.
19. Lin, X.J., S. Barrington, J. Nicell, D. Choiniere and A. Vezina. 2006. Influence of windbreaks on livestock odour dispersion plume in the field. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 116 (3-4): 263-272.
20. McNaughton, K.G. 1988. Effects of windbreaks on turbulent transport and microclimate. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 22-23: 17-39.
21. Nimmermark, S. 2006. Characterization of odour from livestock and poultry operation by the hedonic tone. ASABE Paper No. 064157. St. Joseph, MI: ASABE.
22. Parker, D.B., M.B. Rhoades, G.L. Schuster, I.A. Koziel and Z.L. Perschbacher-Buser. 2005. Odour characterization at open-lot beef cattle feed yards using triangular forced-choice olfactometry. Transactions of the ASAE 48 (4): 1527-1535.
23. SAS. 2001. SAS Proprietary Software Release 8.2. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
24. Schauberger, G., M. Piringer and E. Petz. 2002. Calculating direction-dependent separation distance by a dispersion model to avoid livestock odour annoyance. Biosystems Engineering 82 (1): 25-37.
25. Schnelle, K.B. and P.R. Dey. 2000. Atmospheric Dispersion Modeling Compliance Guide. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
26. Tyndall, J. and J. Collettii. 2000. Air quality and shelterbelts: Odour mitigation and livestock production - A literature review. Final project report to USDA National Agroforestry Center, Lincoln, NB. Project Number 4124-4521-48-3209. Forestry Department, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. http://www.forestry.iastate.edu/res/Shelterbelts_and_Odor_Final_Report.pdf (2007/01/17).
27. Zhang, Q. and others. 2002. Odour production, evaluation and control. Manitoba Livestock Manure Management Initiative Inc. http://www.manure.mb.ca/ projects/completed/pdf/02-hers-03.pdf (2006/12/18).