Failure modes and effective strength of two-phase materials determined by means of numerical limit analysis

Acta Mechanica

Volumn 195, Issue 1-4, 2008, Pages 185-202

  Fussl J ^a   Lackner, R ^b   Eberhardsteiner, J ^a   Mang, H A ^a  

^a VIENNA UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Austria)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MATERIALS PROPERTIES; MATRIX ALGEBRA; NUMERICAL METHODS; VISCOELASTICITY;

INCLUSION MORPHOLOGY; INTERFACE DEGRADATION; MATERIAL FAILURE; NUMERICAL LIMIT ANALYSIS;

COMPOSITE MATERIALS;

EID: 38749127560     PISSN: 00015970     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00707-007-0550-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Aigner E., Lackner R. and Pichler Ch. (2007). "Bottom-up" multiscale modeling of viscoelastic properties of asphalt. Conf. Proc. Adv. Charact. Pavement Soil Engng. Mater. 1: 123-135
2. Lackner, R., Mang, H.: Mehrskalenmodelle für die Berechnung von Flächentragwerken [Multiscale models for the analysis of shell structures]. Ernst & Sohn, Betonkalender 2007. In German, Band 2, 19-65
3. Lemarchand E., Ulm F.J. and Dormieux L. (2002). Effect of inclusions on friction coefficient of highly filled composite materials. J. Engng. Mech. 128(8): 876-884
4. Barthèlèmy J.F. and Dormieux L. (2004). A micromechanical approach to the strength criterion of Drucker-Prager materials reinforced by rigid inclusions. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 28: 565-582
5. Heukamp F.H., Lemarchand E. and Ulm F.J. (2005). The effect of interfacial properties on the cohesion of highly filled composite materials. Int. J. Solids Struct. 42: 287-305
6. Zouain N., Herskovits J., Borges L.A. and Feijoo R.A. (1993). An iterative algorithm for limit analysis with non-linear yield functions. Int. J. Solids Struct. 30(10): 1397-1417
7. Krabbenhoft K., Lyamin A.V., Hjiaj M. and Sloan S.W. (2005). A new discontinuous upper bound limit analysis formulation. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng. 63(7): 1069-1088
8. Makrodimopoulos A. and Martin C.M. (2006). Lower bound limit analysis of cohesive-frictional materials using second-order cone programming. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng. 66(4): 604-634
9. Lyamin A.V. and Sloan S.W. (2002). Upper bound limit analysis using linear finite elements and nonlinear programming. Int. J. Numer. Anal. Methods Geomech. 26: 181-216
10. Lyamin A.V. and Sloan S.W. (2002). Lower bound limit analysis using non-linear programming. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng. 55: 573-611
11. Krabbenhoft K. and Damkilde L. (2003). A general non-linear optimization algorithm for lower bound limit analysis. Int. J. Numer. Methods Engng. 56: 165-184
12. Gondzio J. (1995). HOPDM (version 2.12) - a fast LP solver based on a primal-dual interior point method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 85: 221-225
13. Abbo A.J. and Sloan S.W. (1995). A smoothed hyperbolic approximation to the Mohr-Coulomb yield criterion. Comput. Struct. 54: 427-441
14. Makrodimopoulos, A., Bisbos, C.: Shakedown analysis of plane stress problems via SOCP. In: Staat, M., Heitzer, M. (eds.) Numerical Methods for Limit and Shakedown Analysis, pp. 185-216. John von Neumann Institute for Computing (NIC) (2003)
15. Ciria, H., Peraire, J.: Computation of upper and lower bounds in limit analysis using second-order cone programming and mesh adaptivity. In: 9th ASCE Specialty Conference on Probabilistic Mechanics and Structural Reliability (2004)
16. Makrodimopoulos A. (2006). Computational formulation of shakedown analysis as a conic quadratic optimization problem. Mech. Res. Commun. 33: 72-83
17. Andersen E.D., Roos C. and Terlaky T. (2003). On implementing a primal-dual interior-point method for conic quadratic optimization. Math. Program. Ser. B 95: 249-277
18. MOSEK ApS (2006) The MOSEK optimization tools version 4.0 (revision 35). In: User's manual and reference. http://www.mosek.co. Cited 2006
19. Makrodimopoulos, A., Martin, C.M.: Upper bound limit analysis using discontinuous quadratic displacement fields. Commun. Numer. Methods Engng. (2007) (in print)