Neurolaw: The big question

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 21-22

  Wolf, Susan M ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIMINAL LAW; ETHICS; HUMAN; JURISPRUDENCE; LEGAL ASPECT; METHODOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; PSYCHOLOGY;

COGNITIVE SCIENCE; CRIMINAL LAW; HUMANS; JURISPRUDENCE; NEUROSCIENCES;

EID: 38749126784     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701828485     Document Type: Note

References (8)

1. Capron, A. M., and L. R. Kass. 1972. A statutory definition of the standards for determining human death: an appraisal and a proposal. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121(1): 87-118.
2. Elhauge, E. 1994. Allocating health care morally. California Law Review 82(6): 1449-1544.
3. Meegan, D. V. 2008. Neuroimaging techniques for memory detection: scientific, ethical, and legal issues. American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 8(1): 9-20.
4. Monahan J., and L. Walker. 2006. Social Science in Law: Cases and Materials, 6th ed. New York: Foundation Press.
5. Morse, S. J. 2006. Brain overclaim syndrome and criminal responsibility: a diagnostic note. Ohio State Journal of Criminal Law 3(2): 397-412.
6. Rhoden, N. 1986. Trimesters and technology: revamping Roe v. Wade. 95 Yale Law Journal 95(4): 639-97.
7. Rosen, J. 2007. The brain on the stand. New York Times Magazine 11 March 2007.
8. Tovino, S. A. 2007. Functional neuroimaging and the law: trends and directions for future scholarship. American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 7(9): 44-56.