Appropriateness measures: An uncertainty model for vague concepts

Synthese

Volumn 161, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 255-269

  Lawry, Jonathan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Appropriateness; Assertability; Epistemic stance

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749117222     PISSN: 00397857     EISSN: 15730964     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11229-007-9158-9     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Dubois, D., & Prade H. (1988). An introduction to possibility and fuzzy logics. In P. Smets et al. (Eds.), Non-standard logics for automated reasoning (pp. 742-755). Academic Press.
2. Kyburg A. (2000) When vague sentences inform: A model of assertability. Synthese 124: 175-192
3. Lawry, J. (2006). Modelling and reasoning with vague concepts. Springer.
4. Lawry J. (2004) A framework for linguistic modelling. Artificial Intelligence 155: 1-39
5. Parikh R. (1994) Vagueness and utility: The semantics of common nouns. Linguistics and Philosophy 17: 521-535
6. Parikh, R. (1996) Vague predicates and language games. Theoria (Spain) XI(27), 97-107.
7. Pearl, J. (1988). Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference, Morgan Kaufmann.
8. Tang Y., Zheng J. (2006) Linguistic modelling based on semantic similarity relation amongst linguistic labels. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157: 1662-1673
9. Williamson T. (1992) Vagueness and ignorance. Proceedings of the Aristotlian Society 66: 145-162
10. Williamson, T. (1994). Vagueness, Routledge.
11. Zadeh L.A. (1965) Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8(3): 338-353
12. Zadeh L.A. (1975) The concept of linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Part 1. Information Sciences 8: 199-249