Adaptive dynamics for physiologically structured population models

Journal of Mathematical Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 673-742

  Durinx, Michel ^a   Metz, J A J ^a,b   Meszéna, Géza ^c  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^c EÖTVÖS LORÁND UNIVERSITY   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Adaptive dynamics; Evolutionary modelling; Multitype branching processes; Multivariate evolutionarily singular strategies; Physiologically structured populations

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; MUTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ECOSYSTEM; EVOLUTION; MODELS, GENETIC; MUTATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

EID: 38749107615     PISSN: 03036812     EISSN: 14321416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00285-007-0134-2     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Athreya K. (1992). Rates of decay for the survival probability of a mutant gene. J. Math. Biol. 30: 577-581
2. Athreya K. (1993). Rates of decay for the survival probability of a mutant gene. II. The multitype case. J. Math. Biol. 32: 45-53
3. E X Users Group (1997)
4. Caswell, H.: Population models: construction, analysis, and interpretation, 2nd edn. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland (2001)
5. Champagnat, N.: Convergence of adaptive dynamics n-morphic jump processes to the canonical equation and degenerate diffusion approximation. Prépublication de l'Université de Nanterre (Paris X) no. 03/7 (2003)
6. Champagnat, N.: Etude mathématique de modèles stochastiques d'évolution issus de la théorie écologique des dynamiques adaptives. PhD thesis, Paris X, Paris (France) (2004)
7. Champagnat N. (2006). A microscopic interpretation for adaptive dynamics trait substitution sequence models. Stoch. Process. Appl. 116: 1127-1160
8. Champagnat N., Ferrière R. and Ben Arous G. (2001). The canonical equation of adaptive dynamics: a mathematical view. Selection 2: 71-81
9. Champagnat N., Ferrière R. and Méléard S. (2006). Unifying evolutionary dynamics: from individual stochastic processes to macroscopic models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69: 297-321
10. Christiansen F. (1991). On conditions for evolutionary stability for a continuously varying character. Am. Nat. 138: 37-50
11. Christiansen F. and Loeschke V. (1987). Evolution and intraspecific competition. III. One-locus theory for small additive gene effects and multidimensional resource qualities. Theor. Popul. Biol. 31: 33-46
12. Cressman R. and Hofbauer J. (2005). Measure dynamics on a one-dimensional continuous trait space: Theoretical foundations for adaptive dynamics. Theor. Popul. Biol. 67: 47-59
13. Dercole, F.: Evolutionary dynamics through bifurcation analysis: methods and applications. PhD thesis, Department of Electronics and Information, Politecnico di Milano, Milano (Italy) (2002)
14. Dercole, F., Rinaldi, S.: Analysis of evolutionary processes: the adaptive dynamics approach and its applications. Princeton University Press, Princeton (in press)
15. Dieckmann U. and Law R. (1996). The dynamical theory of coevolution: a derivation from stochastic ecological processes. J. Math. Biol. 34: 579-612
16. Dieckmann U., Marrow P. and Law R. (1995). Evolutionary cycling in predator-prey interactions: population dynamics and the red queen. J. Theor. Biol. 176: 91-102
17. Dieckmann U. and Metz J. (2006). Surprising evolutionary predictions from enhanced ecological realism. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69: 263-281
18. Diekmann O. (2004). A beginner's guide to adaptive dynamics. Math. Model. Popul. Dyn. 63: 47-84
19. Diekmann, O., Getto, P., Gyllenberg, M.: Stability and bifurcation analysis of Volterra functional equations in the light of suns and stars. SIAM J. Math. Anal. (in press)
20. Diekmann O., Gyllenberg M., Huang H., Kirkilionis M., Metz J. and Thieme H. (2001). On the formulation and analysis of general deterministic structured population models. II. Nonlinear theory. J. Math. Biol. 43: 157-189
21. Diekmann O., Gyllenberg M. and Metz J. (2003). Steady state analysis of structured population models. Theor. Popul. Biol. 63: 309-338
22. Eshel I. (1981). On the survival probability of a slightly advantageous mutant gene with a general distribution of progeny size-a branching process model. J. Math. Biol. 12: 355-362
23. Eshel I. (1984). On the survival probability of a slightly advantageous mutant gene in a multitype population: a multidimensional branching process model. J. Math. Biol. 19: 201-209
24. Ewens W. (1969). Population Genetics. Methuen, London
25. Geritz S. (2005). Resident-invader dynamics and the coexistence of similar strategies. J. Math. Biol. 50: 67-82
26. Geritz S., Gyllenberg M., Jacobs F. and Parvinen K. (2002). Invasion dynamics and attractor inheritance. J. Math. Biol. 44: 548-560
27. Geritz S., Kisdi E., Meszéna G. and Metz J. (1998). Evolutionarily singular strategies and the adaptive growth and branching of the evolutionary tree. Evol. Ecol. 12: 35-57
28. Geritz S., Metz J. and van der Meijden E. (1999). Evolutionary dynamics of seed size and seedling competitive ability. Theor. Popul. Biol. 55: 324-343
29. Getto, P.: On some quasilinear structured population models. Thesis, Utrecht University, Utrecht (the Netherlands) (2005)
30. Gillespie D. (1976). A general method for numerically simulating the stochastic time evolution of coupled chemical reactions. J. Comput. Phys. 22: 403-434
31. Greiner G., Heesterbeek J. and Metz J. (1994). A singular perturbation theorem for evolution equations and time-scale arguments for structured population models. Can. Appl. Math. Q. 2: 435-459
32. Haccou P., Jagers P. and Vatutin V. (2005). Branching Processes-Variation, Growth, and Extinction of Populations. Cambridge Studies in Adaptive Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
33. Haldane J. (1927). A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection. v. selection and mutation. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 23: 838-844
34. Hofbauer J. and Sigmund K. (1998). Evolutionary Games and Population Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
35. Hoppe F. (1992). Asymptotic rates of growth of the extinction probability of a mutant gene. J. Math. Biol. 30: 547-566
36. Kendall D. (1948). On the generalized "birth-and-death" process. Ann. Math. Stat. 19: 1-15
37. Kondrashov A. and Turelli M. (1992). Deleterious mutations, apparent stabilizing selection and the maintenance of quantitative variation. Genetics 132: 603-618
38. Lande R. (1979). Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416
39. Leimar O. (2001). Evolutionary change and darwinian demons. Selection 2(1-2): 65-72
40. Leimar O. (2005). The evolution of phenotypic polymorphism: randomized strategies versus evolutionary branching. Am. Nat. 165: 669-681
41. Leimar, O.: Multidimensional convergence stability and the canonical adaptive dynamics. In: Dieckmann, U., Metz, J.A.J. (eds.) Elements of Adaptive Dynamics. Cambridge Studies in Adaptive Dynamics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (UK) (to appear)
42. Levin S. (1970). Community equilibria and stability and an extension of the competitive exclusion principle. Am. Nat. 104: 413-423
43. Lush J. (1937). Animal Breeding Plans. Iowa State College Press, Ames
44. Magnus J. and Neudecker H. (1988). Matrix Differential Calculus with applications in Statistics and Econometrics. Wiley, New York
45. Meszéna G., Gyllenberg M., Jacobs F. and Metz J. (2005). Link between population dynamics and dynamics of darwinian evolution. Phys. Rev. Lett. 95(078105): 1-4
46. Meszéna G., Gyllenberg M., Pásztor L. and Metz J. (2006). Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: a unified theory. Theor. Popul. Biol. 69: 68-87
47. Meszéna, G., Metz, J.: Species diversity and population regulation: the importance of environmental feedback dimensionality. IIASA Interim Report IR-99-045 (1999)
48. Metz J. and Diekmann O. (1986). The Dynamics of Physiologically Structured Populations, volume 68 of Lecture Notes in Biomathematics. Springer, Berlin
49. Metz J., Geritz S., Meszéna G., Jacobs F. and Van Heerwaarden J. (1996). Adaptive dynamics, a geometrical study of the consequences of nearly faithful reproduction. In: Van Strien, S.J. and Verduyn Lunel, S.M. (eds) Stochastic and Spatial Structures of Dynamical Systems, volume 45 of KNAW Symposium Lectures, Section Science, First Series, pp 183-231. North-Holland, Amsterdam
50. Metz J., Nisbet R. and Geritz S. (1992). How should we define fitness for general ecological scenarios?. Trends Ecol. Evol. 7: 198-202
51. Mollison, D.: The structure of epidemic models. In: Epidemic Models: their Structure and Relation to Data, pp. 27-28. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1995)
52. Pigliucci M. (2006). Genetic variance-covariance matrices: a critique of the evolutionary quantitative genetics research program. Biol. Philos. 21: 1-23
53. Schneider K. (2006). A multilocus-multiallele analysis of frequency-dependent selection induced by intraspecific competition. J. Math. Biol. 52: 483-523
54. Turelli M. (1984). Heritable genetic variation via mutation-selection balance: Lerch's zeta meets the abdominal bristle. Theor. Popul. Biol. 25: 138-193
55. van Kampen N. (1981). Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. North-Holland, Amsterdam
56. Vukics A., Asbóth J. and Meszéna G. (2003). Speciation in multidimensional evolutionary space. Phys. Rev. E 68(041903): 1-10
57. Zhang X. and Hill W. (2005). Genetic variability under mutation selection balance. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20: 468-470