Coronary angiography with dual source computed tomography: Initial experience

Chinese Medical Sciences Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 205-210

  Zhang, Zhu Hua ^a   Jin, Zheng Yu ^a   Zhang, Shu Yang ^a   Lin, Song Bai ^a   Li, Dong Jing ^a   Kong, Ling Yan ^a   Wang, Yi Ning ^a   Song, Lan ^a   Wang, Yun ^a   Zhao, Wen Min ^a   Mou, Wen Bin ^a   Zhang, Li Ren ^a   Zhu, Wen Ling ^a   Miao, Qi ^a   Fang, Qi ^a  

^a PEKING UNION MEDICAL COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (China)

Author keywords

Computed tomography; Coronary angiography; Coronary heart disease

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; METOPROLOL;

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOCARDIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BREATH HOLDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC APPROACH ROUTE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE;

ADULT; CORONARY ANGIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 38749095941     PISSN: 10019294     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ghersin E, Litmanovich D, Dragu R, et al. 16-MDCT coronary angiography versus invasive coronary angiography in acute chest pain syndrome: a blinded prospective study. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186:177-84.
2. Pannu HK, Jacobs JE, Lai S, et al. Coronary CT angiography with 64-MDCT: assessment of vessel visibility. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 187:119-26.
3. Leschka S, Alkadhi H, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. Eur Heart J 2005; 26:1482-7.
4. Mollet NR, Cademartiri F, van Mieghem CAG, et al. High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography. Circulation 2005; 112:2318-23.
5. Achenbach S, Ropers D, Kuettner A, et al. Contrast-enhanced coronary artery visualization by dual-source computed tomography-initial experience. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57:331-5.
6. Agatston AS, Janowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol 1990; 15:827-32.
7. Austen WG, Edwards JE, Frye RL, et al. A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation 1975; 51(4 Suppl):5-40.
8. Hoffmann MHK, Shi H, Manzke R, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. Radiology 2005; 234:86-97.
9. Leschka S, Wildermuth S, Boehm T, et al. Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. Radiology 2006; 241:378-85.
10. Zhang ZH, Jin ZY, Li DJ, et al. Coronary artery imaging with multi-slice spiral CT. Chin J Radiol 2003; 37 (memorial issue): 147-52.
11. Herzog C, Arning M, Zangos S, et al. Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. Radiology 2006; 238:75-86.
12. Leschka S, Husmann L, Desbiolles LM, et al. Optimal image reconstruction intervals for non-invasive coronary angiography with 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol 2006; 16:1964-72.