Interdisciplinary approaches for a pragmatic neuroethics

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 52-53

  Racine, Eric ^a  

^a CLIN RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF MONTREAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; NEUROLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NOTE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE;

ETHICS, CLINICAL; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NEUROLOGY; NEUROSCIENCES; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE;

EID: 38749090936     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160701828444     Document Type: Note

References (19)

1. British Medical Association. 2007. Boosting Your Brainpower: Ethical Aspects of Cognitive Enhancement. London, UK: British Medical Association.
2. Chatterjee, A. 2004. Cosmetic neurology: the controversy over enhancing movement, mentation, and mood. Neurology 63(6): 968-974.
3. Cranford, R. E. 1989. The neurologist as ethics consultant and as a member of the institutional ethics committee. Neurologic Clinics 7(4): 697-713.
4. Dewey, J. 1922. Human Nature and Conduct: An Introduction to Social Psychology. New York, NY: Holt.
5. Fins, J. J. 2005. Clinical pragmatism and the care of brain damaged patients: Toward a palliative neuroethics for disorders of consciousness. Progress in Brain Research 150:565-82.
6. Fins, J. J. 2008. A leg to stand on: Sir William Osier and Wilder Penfield's "Neuroethics". American Journal of Bioethics (AJOB-Neuroscience) 8(1): 37-46.
7. McCarthy, M. 2007. Prescription drug abuse up sharply in the USA. Lancet 369(9572): 1505-1506.
8. Miller, F. G., J. J. Fins, and M. D. Bacchetta. 1996. Clinical pragmatism: John Dewey and clinical ethics. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy 13(1): 27-51.
9. Moreno, J. 1999. Bioethics is a naturalism. In Pragmatic Bioethics, ed., G. McGee, 5-17. Nashville/London: Vanderbilt University Press.
10. National Institute on Drug Abuse. 2005. Prescription drugs: abuse and addiction. Research Report Series. Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
11. Pontius, A. A. 1973. Neuro-ethics of "walking" in the newborn. Perceptual and Motor Skills 37(1): 235-15.
12. Pontius, A. A. 1993. Neuroethics vs neurophysiologically and neuropsychologically uninformed influences in child-rearing, education, emerging hunter-gatherers, and artificial intelligence models of the brain. Psychological Reports 72(2): 451-458.
13. Racine, E. 2008. Comment on 'Does it make sense for neuroethics?' EMBO Report 9(1): 1-2.
14. Racine, E. In press. Which naturalism for bioethics? A defense of moderate (pragmatic) naturalism. Bioethics.
15. Racine, E., Bar-Ilan, O., and J. Illes. 2005. fMRI in the public eye. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 6(2): 159-164.
16. Racine, E., and J. Illes. 2008. Neuroethics. In Cambridge Textbook of Bioethics, eds. P. Singer and A. Viens, 495-503. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Roskies, A. 2002. Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35(1): 21-23.
18. Shevell, M. I. 1999. Neurosciences in the Third Reich: from ivory tower to death camps. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences 26(2): 132-138.
19. Young, S. N. 2003. Lifestyle drugs, mood, behaviour and cognition. Journal of Psychiatry and Neuroscience 28(2): 87-9.