The software tool storybuilder and the analysis of the horrible stories of occupational accidents

Safety Science

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 186-197

  Bellamy, L J ^a   Ale, B J M ^b   Whiston, J Y ^d   Mud, M L ^e   Baksteen, H ^f   Hale, A R ^b   Papazoglou, I A ^g   Bloemhoff, A ^h   Damen, M ⁱ   Oh, J I H ^c  

^a White Queen BV   (Netherlands)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

^c Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment Netherlands   (Netherlands)

^d Whiston Computers Ltd   (United Kingdom)

^e RPS Nederland   (Netherlands)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC HEALTH AND THE ENVIRONMENT   (Netherlands)

^g INSTITUTE OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY   (Greece)

^h National Reference Laboratory   (Netherlands)

ⁱ RIGO Research and Advice   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accident analysis; Accident statistics; Falls; Safety barriers; Scenarios; Software; Underlying causes; Vehicles

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENTS; DATA REDUCTION; GROUND VEHICLES; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS;

ACCIDENT ANALYSIS; CONSTRUCT MODELS; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS; SAFETY BARRIERS;

COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DANGEROUS GOODS; HUMAN; OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENT; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRAFFIC ACCIDENT;

EID: 38749084908     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2007.06.022     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Ale, B.J.M, Baksteen, H., Bellamy, L.J., Bloemhof, A., Goossens, L., Hale, A.R., Mud, M.L., Oh, J.I.H., Papazoglou, I.A., Post, J., Whiston, J.Y., 2006. Quantifying occupational risk: the development of an occupational risk model. In: Conference: Working on Safety 2006, The Eemhof, The Netherlands, 12-15 September.
2. Arbeidesinspectie, 2002. Proposed structure of a risk analysis model for working conditions. (Dutch) (Voorstel opzet risico analyse model arbeidsomstandigheden). Unpublished Internal Labour Inspectorate Document, Ministry SZW, The Netherlands, July 2002.
3. Arbeidsinspectie, 2005. Internal instruction. The handling of reported occupational accidents Interne Instructie. Afhandeling meldingen van arbeidsongevallen. http://www.arbo.nl/systems/organisations/.
4. Arbowet Artikel 9, 1999. Article 9 in the 1999 Revision to Dutch Working Conditons Law of 1998 & the Explanatory Memorandum. In: Dutch (Wet van 18 maart 1999 Arbeidsomstandighedenwet 1998) Staatsblad van het Koninkrijk der Nederlanden 184.
5. Bellamy, L.J., Papazoglou, I.A., Hale, A.R., Aneziris, O.N., Ale, B.J.M., Morris, M.I., Oh, J.I.H., 1999. I-Risk: Development of an integrated technical and management risk control and monitoring methodology for managing and quantifying on-site and off-site risks. Contract ENVA-CT96-0243. Report to European Union. Ministry of Social Affairs and Employment. Den Haag.
6. European Commission, 2001. European statistics on accidents at work (ESAW). Methodology 2001 E Doc. ESTAT/E3/HSW/2001/1130.
7. Haddon Jr. W. Energy damage and the ten countermeasure strategies. Human Factors Journal 15 (1973)
8. Heinrich H.W. Industrial Accident Prevention (1931), McGraw-Hill, New York
9. Leidelmeijer, K., Grieken, P.v., Pouw, N., Heemskerk, H., 2003. Towards a risk model of occupational accidents. In Dutch (Naar een risicomodel arbeidsongevallen). Report 83530, RIGO Research en Advies BV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.