Response to: Bi, J. (2007). Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference 18, 500-507

Food Quality and Preference

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 344-

  Ennis, Daniel ^a  

^a Institute for Perception   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38749083436     PISSN: 09503293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodqual.2007.10.001     Document Type: Letter

References (7)

1. Anderson S., and Hauck W.W. A new procedure for testing equivalence in comparative bioavailability and other clinical trials. Communications in Statistics, Theory and Methods 12 (1983) 2663-2692
2. Berger R.L., and Hsu J.C. Bioequivalency trials, intersection-union tests and equivalency confidence sets. Statistical Science 11 (1996) 283-302
3. Bi J. Similarity testing in sensory and consumer research. Food Quality and Preference 16 (2005) 139-149
4. Bi J. Similarity testing using paired comparison method. Food Quality and Preference 18 (2007) 500-507
5. Ennis, D. M. (submitted for publication). Hypothesis testing for equivalence defined on symmetric open intervals.
6. Schuirmann D.J. On hypothesis testing to determine if the mean of a normal distribution is contained in a known interval. Biometrics 37 (1981) 617
7. Westlake W.J. Response to T.B.L. Kirkwood: Bioequivalency testing - a need to rethink. Biometrics 37 (1981) 589-594