New percutaneous mechanical left ventricular support for acute MI: The AMC MACH program

Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 62-63

  Henriques, José P S ^a   de Mol, Bas A J M ^a,b  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE HEART INFARCTION; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; CARDIOGENIC SHOCK; CAUSE OF DEATH; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY BLOOD FLOW; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; DISEASE REGISTRY; DISEASE SEVERITY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEART ASSIST DEVICE; HEART FUNCTION; HEART HEMODYNAMICS; HEART INFARCTION SIZE; HEART MUSCLE REVASCULARIZATION; HEART OUTPUT; HEART TRANSPLANTATION; HUMAN; LEG ISCHEMIA; MORTALITY; PATIENT SELECTION; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; ST SEGMENT ELEVATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

DECISION TREES; HEART-ASSIST DEVICES; HUMANS; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SHOCK, CARDIOGENIC; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 38649143227     PISSN: 17434297     EISSN: 17434300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ncpcardio1060     Document Type: Review

References (10)

1. Babaev A et al. for the NRMI Investigators (2005) Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction oomplicated by cardiogenic shock. JAMA 294: 448-454
2. Hochman JS et al. (1999) Early revascularization acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock. N Engl J Med 341: 625-634
3. Antman EA et al. (2004) ACC/AHA Guidelines for the Management of Patients With ST-elevation myocardial infarction - executive summary: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction). Circulation 110: 588-636
4. Smith SC et al. (ACC/AHA/SCAI 2005 Guideline Update for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - summary article: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/SCAI Writing Committee to Update the 2001 Guidelines for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention). Circulation 113: 156-175
5. Barron HV et al. for the Investigators in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2 (2001) The use of intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation in patients with cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: Data from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 2. Am Heart J 141: 933-939
6. Anderson M et al. (2006) Ventricular assist devices improve recovery outcomes in acute myocardial infarction cardiogenic shock: benchmark of US multicenter experience against SHOCK trial [abstract #204]. Poster presented at Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2006: October 22-27, Washington DC, USA
7. Henriques JP et al. (2006) Safety and feasibility of elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention procedures with left ventricular support of the Impella Recover LP 2.5. Am J Cardiol 97: 990-902
8. Remmelink M et al. Effects of left ventricular unloading by Impella Recover LP2.5 on coronary hemodynamics. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, in press
9. Sjauw KD et al. Left ventricular unloading in acute STEMI patients is safe and feasible and provides acute and sustained left ventricular recovery: The AMC MACH 2 study. J Am Coll Cardiol, in press
10. Birks EJ et al. (2006) Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure. N Engl J Med 355: 1873-1884