An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects: A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study

Omega

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 754-765

  Melón, Mónica García ^a   Aragonés Beltran, Pablo ^a   Carmen Gonzalez Cruz M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

AHP; Decision process; Education; Group decisions

Indexed keywords

EID: 38649142499     PISSN: 03050483     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.omega.2006.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Mustafa A., and Goh M. Multi-criterion models for higher education administration. Omega, International Journal of Management Science 24 (1996) 167-178
2. Politis Y., and Siskos Y. Multicriteria methodology for the evaluation of a Greek engineering department. European Journal of Operational Research 156 (2004) 223-240
3. Caballero R., Galache T., Gómez T., Molina J., and Torrico A. Efficient assignment of financial resources within a university system. Study of the University of Malaga. European Journal of Operational Research 133 (2001) 298-309
4. Davey A., Olson D., and Wallenius J. The process of multiattribute decision making: a case study of selecting applicants for a Ph.D. program. European Journal of Operational Research 72 (1994) 469-484
5. Keeney R.L., and Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs (1976), Wiley, New York
6. Saaty T.L. Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory (1980), RWS Publications, Pittsburgh
7. Roy B. The outranking approach and the foundations of Electre methods. Theory and Decision 31 (1991) 49-73
8. Brans J.P., Vincke Ph., and Mareschal B. How to select and how to rank projects: the Promethee method. European Journal of Operational Research 24 (1986) 228-238
9. Belton V., and Stewart T.J. Multiple criteria decision analysis, an integrated approach (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
10. Figueira J, Greco S, Ehrgott M, editors, Multiple criteria Decisión Análisis, state of the art surveys. Springer Science; 2005.
11. Bouyssou D., Marchout Th., Pirlot M., Peruy P., Troukias A., and Vincke Ph. Evaluation and decision models. A critical perspective (2000), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht
12. Expert Choice 2000 Team. Pittsburgh: Expert Choice, Inc.; 2001.
13. Forgionne G.A., Kohli R., and Jennings D. An AHP analysis of quality in AI and DSS journals. Omega 30 (2002) 171-183
14. DeSanctis G., and Gallupe. A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Management Science 22 (1987) 589-609
15. Dyer R.F., and Forman E.H. Group decision support with the analytic hierarchy process. Decision Support Systems 8 (1992) 99-124
16. Aczel J., and Saaty T. Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgements. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 27 (1983) 93-102
17. Saaty T. Group decision making and the AHP. In: Golden B.L., Wasil E.A., and Harker P.T. (Eds). The analytic hierarchy process: applications and studies (1989), Springer, Heidelberg 59-67
18. Raman KS, Tan BC, Wei KK. An empirical study of task type and communication medium in GDSS. Proceedings of the 26th annual Hawaii international conference on systems sciences 1993. Silver Spring, MD: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Gallupe R.B., and McKeen J.D. Enhancing computer-mediated communication: an experimental investigation into the use of a group decision support system for face-to-face vs. remote meetings. Information and Management 18 (1990) 1-13
20. Aragonés P., Gómez-Senent E., and Pastor J. Ordering the alternatives of a strategic plan of Valencia (Spain). Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis 10 (2001) 153-171
21. Greenbaum T.L. The handbook for focus group research (1993), Lexington, New York
22. Mareschal B. Weight stability intervals in multicriteria decision aid. European Journal of Operational Research 33 (1988) 54-64
23. Bordeching K., Eppel T., and von Winterfeldt D. Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science 37 (1991) 1603-1619
24. Holsaple C. Decision support in multiparticipant decision makers. Journal of Computer Information Systems 18 (1991) 37-45
25. Baltes B.B., Dickson M.W., Sherman M.P., Bauer C.C., and LaGanke J.S. Computer mediated communication and group decision making: a meta-analysis. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes 87 (2002) 156-179