MR angiographic evaluation is limited in intracranial aneurysms embolized with Nexus coils

Neuroradiology

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 171-178

  Kang, Hyun Seung ^a   Moon, Won Jin ^a   Roh, Hong Gee ^a   Han, Moon Hee ^b   Choe, Woo Jin ^a   Cho, Joon ^a   Moon, Chang Taek ^a   Koh, Young Cho ^a  

^a Konkuk University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Coil embolization; Intracranial aneurysm; MR angiography

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIGHT JUNCTION; TIME OF FLIGHT MASS SPECTROMETRY;

ADULT; AGED; EMBOLIZATION, THERAPEUTIC; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 38649142422     PISSN: 00283940     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00234-007-0320-3     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Bendszus M, Solymosi L (2006) Cerecyte coils in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a preliminary clinical study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:2053-2057
2. Connor SE, West RJ, Yates DA (2001) The ability of plain radiography to predict intracranial aneurysm occlusion instability during follow-up of endosaccular treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 43:680-686
3. Costalat V, Lebars E, Sarry L, Defasque A, Barbotte E, Brunel H, Bourbotte G, Bonafe A (2006) In vitro evaluation of 2D-digital subtraction angiography versus 3D-time-of-flight in assessment of intracranial cerebral aneurysm filling after endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 27:177-184
4. Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, Vinikoff-Sonier CB, Bertrand P, Domengie F, Barantin L, Herbreteau D (2003) Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: is contrast material necessary in the follow-up with 3D time-of-flight MR angiography? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 24:1797-1803
5. Cottier JP, Bleuzen-Couthon A, Gallas S, Vinikoff-Sonier CB, Bertrand P, Domengie F, Barantin L, Herbreteau D (2003) Follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils: comparison of plain radiographs, 3D time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. Neuroradiology 45:818-824
6. Derdeyn CP, Graves VB, Turski PA, Masaryk AM, Strother CM (1997) MR angiography of saccular aneurysms after treatment with Guglielmi detachable coils: preliminary experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:279-286
7. Gonner F, Heid O, Remonda L, Nicoli G, Baumgartner RW, Godoy N, Schroth G (1998) MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 19:1324-1328
8. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Dion J, Duckwiler G (1991) Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 2: Preliminary clinical experience. J Neurosurg 75:8-14
9. Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, Sepetka I, Macellari V (1991) Electrothrombosis of saccular aneurysms via endovascular approach. Part 1: Electrochemical basis, technique, and experimental results. J Neurosurg 75:1-7
10. Hartman J, Nguyen T, Larsen D, Teitelbaum GP (1997) MR artifacts, heat production, and ferromagnetism of Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 18:497-501
11. Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, Derdeyn CP (2001) In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 219:732-737
12. Jennett B, Bond M (1975) Assessment of outcome after severe brain damage: a practical scale. Lancet 1:480-484
13. Jupp B, Williams JP, Tesiram YA, Vosmansky M, O'Brien TJ (2006) MRI compatible electrodes for the induction of amygdala kindling in rats. J Neurosci Methods 155:72-76
14. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon OK, Kim SH, Choi SH, Chang KH (2005) Short-term outcome of intracranial aneurysms treated with polyglycolic acid/lactide copolymer-coated coils compared to historical controls treated with bare platinum coils: a single-center experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:1921-1928
15. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, Kwon OK, Kim SH (2006) Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 58:60-70
16. Kang HS, Han MH, Lee TH, Shin YS, Roh HG, Kwon OK, Kwon BJ, Kim SY, Kim SH, Byun HS (2007) Embolization of intracranial aneurysms with hydrogel-coated coils: result of Korean Multicenter Trial. Neurosurgery 61:51-59
17. Kwon BJ, Han MH, Oh CW, Kim KH, Chang KH (2002) Anatomical and clinical outcomes after endovascular treatment for unruptured cerebral aneurysms: a single center experience. Intervent Neuroradiol 8:367-376
18. Kwon BJ, Han MH, Oh CW, Kim KH, Chang KH (2003) Procedure-related haemorrhage in embolisation of intracranial aneurysms with Guglielmi detachable coils. Neuroradiology 45:562-569
19. Lovblad KO, Yilmaz H, Chouiter A, San Millan Ruiz D, Abdo G, Bijlenga P, de Tribolet N, Ruefenacht DA (2006) Intracranial aneurysm stenting: follow-up with MR angiography. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:418-422
20. Marshall MW, Teitelbaum GP, Kim HS, Deveikis J (1991) Ferromagnetism and magnetic resonance artifacts of platinum embolization microcoils. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 14:163-166
21. Martinez-Santiesteban FM, Swanson SD, Noll DC, Anderson DJ (2007) Magnetic field perturbation of neural recording and stimulating microelectrodes. Phys Med Biol 52:2073-2088
22. Schmalbrock P, Yuan C, Chakeres DW, Kohli J, Pelc NJ (1990) Volume MR angiography: methods to achieve very short echo times. Radiology 175:861-865
23. Shellock FG, Detrick MS, Brant-Zawadski MN (1997) MR compatibility of Guglielmi detachable coils. Radiology 203:568-570
24. Walker MT, Tsai J, Parish T, Tzung B, Shaibani A, Krupinski E, Russell EJ (2005) MR angiographic evaluation of platinum coil packs at 1.5 T and 3 T: an in vitro assessment of artifact production: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 26:848-853
25. Wall A, Kugel H, Bachman R, Matuszewski L, Kramer S, Heindel W, Maintz D (2005) 3.0 T vs. 1.5 T MR angiography: in vitro comparison of intravascular stent artifacts. J Magn Reson Imaging 22:772-779
26. Yamada N, Hayashi K, Murao K, Higashi M, Iihara K (2004) Time-of-flight MR angiography targeted to coiled intracranial aneurysms is more sensitive to residual flow than is digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 25:1154-1157