The sensitivity of dragonflies to landscape structure differs between life-history groups

Landscape Ecology

Volumn 23, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 149-158

  Kadoya, Taku ^a   Suda, Shin Ichi ^a   Tsubaki, Yoshitaka ^b   Washitani, Izumi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Complex life cycle; Fragmentation; Functional group; Odonata

Indexed keywords

CENSUS; FLY; GRASSLAND; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LIFE HISTORY; REPRODUCTION; SAMPLING; TEMPERATE ENVIRONMENT;

ANISOPTERA (DRAGONFLIES); ODONATA;

EID: 38649132907     PISSN: 09212973     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-007-9151-1     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Andrén H, Delin A, Seiler A (1997) Population response to landscape changes depends on specialization to different landscape elements. Oikos 80:193-196
2. Bernath B, Szedenics G, Wildermuth H, Horvath G (2002) How can dragonflies discern bright and dark waters from a distance? The degree of polarisation of reflected light as a possible cue for dragonfly habitat selection. Freshw Biol 47:1707-1719
3. Borcard D, Legendre P, Drapeau P (1992) Partialling out the spatial component of ecological variation. Ecology 73:1045-1055
4. Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference: a practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
5. Conrad KF, Willson KH, Harvey IF, Thomas CJ, Sherratt TN (1999) Dispersal characteristics of seven odonate species in an agricultural landscape. Ecography 22:524-531
6. Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies: behavior and ecology of Odonata. Cornell University Press, New York
7. Driscoll DA, Weir T (2005) Beetle responses to habitat fragmentation depend on ecological traits, habitat condition, and remnant size. Conserv Biol 19:182-194
8. Ewers RM, Didham RK (2006) Confounding factors in the detection of species responses to habitat fragmentation. Biol Rev 81:117-142
9. Fahrig L (2003) Effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Systemat 34:487-515
10. Fielding AH, Bell JF (1997) A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ Conserv 24:38-49
11. Fincke OM (1992) Interspecific competition for tree holes: consequences for mating systems and coexistence in Neotropical damselflies. Am Nat 139:80-101
12. Halpern BS, Gaines SD, Warner RR (2005) Habitat size, recruitment, and longevity as factors limiting population size in stage-structured species. Am Nat 165:82-94
13. Henle K, Davies KF, Kleyer M, Margules C, Settele J (2004) Predictors of species sensitivity to fragmentation. Biodiv Conserv 13:207-251
14. Johnson JB, Omland KS (2004) Model selection in ecology and evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 19:101-108
15. Kadoya T, Suda S, Washitani I (2004) Dragonfly species richness on man-made ponds: effects of pond size and pond age on newly established assemblages. Ecol Res 19:461-467
16. Knaus P, Wildermuth H (2002) Site attachment and displacement of adults in two alpine metapopulations of Somatochlora alpestris (Odonata:Corduliidae). Int J Odonatol 5:111-128
17. Knight TM, McCoy MW, Chase JM, McCoy KA, Holt RD (2005) Trophic cascades across ecosystems. Nature 437:880-883
18. Krawchuk MA, Taylor PD (2003) Changing importance of habitat structure across multiple spatial scales for three species of insects. Oikos 103:153-161
19. Legendre P (1993) Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm. Ecology 74:1659-1673
20. Manel S, Williams HC, Ormerod SJ (2001) Evaluating presence-absence models in ecology: the need to account for prevalence. J Appl Ecol 38:921-931
21. Morton ES (1977) Ecology and behavior of some Panamanian Odonata. Proc Entomol Soc Wash 79:273-273
22. Pope SE, Fahrig L, Merriam NG (2000) Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology 81:2498-2508
23. Purse BV, Hopkins GW, Day KJ, Thompson DJ (2003) Dispersal characteristics and management of a rare damselfly. J Appl Ecol 40:716-728
24. Purtauf T, Dauber J, Wolters V (2005) The response of carabids to landscape simplification differs between trophic groups. Oecologia 142:458-464
25. Rhodes JR, Wiegand T, McAlpine CA, Callaghan J, Lunney D, Bowen M, Possingham HP (2006) Modeling species' distributions to improve conservation in semiurban landscapes: Koala case study. Conserv Biol 20:449-459
26. Steyler NS, Samways MJ (1995) Biotope selection by adult male dragonflies (Odonata) at an artificial lake created for insect conservation in South Africa. Biol Conserv 72:381-386
27. Sugimura M, Ishida S, Kojima K, Ishida K, Aoki H (1999) Dragonflies of the Japanese archipelago in color (in Japanese). Hokkaido University Press, Sapporo
28. Taguchi M (1987) Population ecology of Sympetrum spp. in paddy fields surrounded by hills (in Japanese). Insect Nat 22:7-12
29. Van Buskirk J (2005) Local and landscape influence on amphibian occurrence and abundance. Ecology 86:1936-1947
30. Washitani I (2003) Restoration of aquatic ecosystems. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama: the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 143-147
31. Watanabe M, Taguchi M (1988) Community structure of coexisting Sympetrum species in the central Japanese paddy fields in autumn (Anisoptera Libellulidae). Odonatologica 17:249-262
32. Watanabe M, Matsuoka H, Taguchi M (2004) Habitat selection and population parameters of Sympetrumin fuscatum (Selys) during sexually mature stages in a cool temperate zone of Japan (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 33:169-179
33. Watanabe M, Matsuoka H, Susa K, Taguchi M (2005) Thoracic temperature in Sympetrum infuscatum (Selys) in relation to habitat and activity (Anisoptera: Libellulidae). Odonatologica 34:271-283
34. Wilbur HM (1980) Complex life cycles. Annu Rev Ecol Systemat 11:67-93
35. Yoshida M, Yagi T, Muraki A (1998) Dragonflies and Damselflies (Insecta:Odonata) of Shiga Prefecture, Honshu, Japan (in Japanese). Lake Biwa Museum, Kusatsu