Eliciting Canadian population preferences for health states using the Classification and Measurement System of Functional Health (CLAMES)

Chronic Diseases in Canada

Volumn 28, Issue 1-2, 2007, Pages 29-41

  McIntosh, Cameron N ^a   Gorber, Sarah Connor ^a   Bernier, Julie ^a   Berthelot, Jean Marie ^a  

^a STATISTICS CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Canadian health state preferences; Classification and measurement system of functional health; Population health impact; Preference based scoring function; Standard gamble

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; CLASSIFICATION AND MEASUREMENT SYSTEM OF FUNCTIONAL HEALTH; EXERCISE; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH PROGRAM; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MORBIDITY; SCORING SYSTEM;

CANADA; COMMUNICATION; DATA COLLECTION; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PUBLIC OPINION; QUALITY OF LIFE;

EID: 38649127518     PISSN: 02288699     EISSN: 14818523     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lenert L, Kaplan RM. Validity and interpretation of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life. Med Care 2000;38(9suppl):II138- II150.
2. Brazier J, Deverill M, Green C. A review of the use of health status measures in economic evaluation. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999;4(3):174-184.
3. Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
4. Murray CJL, Lopez AD, editors. The global burden of disease: A comprehensive assessment of mortality and disability from diseases, injuries, and risk factors in 1990 and projected to 2020. Vol 1. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 1996.
5. Sommerfeld J, Baltussen RMPM, Metz L, Sanon M, Sauerborn R. Determinants of variance in health state valuations. In: Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 549-579.
6. Gold ME, Russell LB, Siegal JE, Weinstein MC. Cost-effectiveness in health and medicine. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
7. Edgar A, Salek S, Shickle D, Cohen D. The ethical QALY: Ethical issues in health care resource allocations. Euromed Communications; 1998.
8. Hadorn DC. The role of public values in setting health care priorities. Soc Sci Med 1991;32:773-781.
9. Feeny D, Furlong W, Torrance GW et al. Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 system. Med Care 2002;40:113-128.
10. Ware JE, Jr. SF-36 health survey update. Spine 2000;25(24):3130-3139.
11. Rabin R, de Charro F. EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQoL group. Ann Med 2001;33:337-343.
12. Krabbe PF, Stouthard MEA, Essink-Bot ML, Bonsel GJ. The effect of adding a cognitive dimension to the EuroQol multiattribute health-status classification system. J Clin Epidemiol 1999;52(4):293-301.
13. Dolan P. Modelling the relation between the description and valuation of health states In: Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 502-513.
14. Brazier J, Rice N, Roberts J. Modelling health state valuation data. In: Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2002. p. 529-547.
15. Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psych Rev 1956;63(2):81-97.
16. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong W. Visual analog scales: Do they have a role in the measurement of preferences for health states? Med Decis Making 2001;21:329-334.
17. Feeny DH. The utility approach to assessing population health. In Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 515-528.
18. Gafni A. The standard gamble method: What is being measured and how it is interpreted. Health Serv Res 1994;29(2):207-224.
19. Furlong W, Feeny D, Torrance, GW, Barr R, Horsman J. Guide to design and development of health-state utility instrumentation. Hamilton, Canada: Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis, McMaster University; 1990.
20. Measurement and Valuation of Health Group, Gudex C, editor. Standard gamble user manual: Props and self-completing methods. York, England: Centre for Health Economics, University of York; 1994.
21. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1944.
22. Dolan P, Gudex C, Kind P, Williams A. Valuing health states: A comparison of methods. J Health Econ 1996;15:209-231.
23. Statistics Canada. Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), Cycle 2.1. Available at ww.statcan.ca/cgi-bin/imdb/p2SV.pl? Function=getSurvey&SDDS= 3226&lang=en&db=IMDB&dbg=f&adm=8&dis=2/.
24. Mahapatra P, Nanda L, Rajshree KT. The 6D5L description system for health state valuation. In: Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 349-367.
25. Ross PL, Littenberg B, Fearn P, Scardino PT, Karakiewicz PI, Kattan MW. Paper standard gamble: A paper-based measure of standard gamble utility for current health. Int J Technol Assess in Health Care 2003;19(1):135-147.
26. Rutten-van Mölken MPM, Bakker CH, van Doorslaer EKA, van der Linden S. Methodological issues of patient utility assessment - experience from two clinical trials. Med Care 1995;33:922-937.
27. Fischhoff B. Value elicitation: is there anything in there? American Psychologist 1991;46:835-847.
28. Stein K, Ratcliffe J, Round A, Milne R, Brazier JE. Impact of discussion on preferences elicited in a group setting. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 2006;4:22.
29. Mathers C, Vos T, Stevenson C. The burden of disease and injury in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (cat no. PHE17). Canberra: AIHW; 1999.
30. Shaw, JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ. US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: Development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005;43(3):203-220.
31. Sadana R. Measurement of variance in health state valuations in Phnom Penh, Cambodia. In: Murray CJL, Salomon JA, Mathers CD, Lopez AD, editors. Summary measures of population health: Concepts, ethics, measurement and applications. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. p. 593-618.
32. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 1997;35(11):1095-1108.
33. Public Health Agency of Canada Web site. Preliminary results for cancers. Available at: www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/phi-isp/cancers.html
34. Boswell-Purdy J, Flanagan WM, Roberge H, Le Petit C, White KJ, Berthelot J-M. Population health impact of cancer in Canada, 2001. Chron Dis Can 2007;28(1-2):42-55.