Electrical impedance scanning as a new breast cancer risk stratification tool for young women

Journal of Surgical Oncology

Volumn 97, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 112-120

  Stojadinovic, Alexander ^a   Nissan, Aviram ^b   Shriver, Craig D ^a,w   Mittendorf, Elizabeth A ^c   Akin, Mark D ^d   Dickerson, Vivian ^e,f   Lenington, Sarah ^g   Platt, Lawrence D ^h,i   Stavros, Thomas ^j   Goldstein, Steven R ^k,l,x   Moskovitz, Orah ^m   Gallimidi, Zahava ⁿ   Fields, Scott I ^v,x   Yeshaya, Arieh ^o   Allweis, Tanir M ^b   Manassa, Raymond ^p   Pappo, Itzhak ^q   Ginor, Ron X ^r   D'Agostino, Ralph B ^s,x,y,z,aa   Gur, David ^t,u,x  

^a WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS   (United States)

^d Austin Area Obstetrics Gynecology and Fertility PA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f HOAG MEMORIAL HOSPITAL PRESBYTERIAN   (United States)

^g SGL Biomedical Consulting LLC   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ Center for Fetal Medicine and Women's Ultrasound   (United States)

^j Radiology Imaging Associates   (United States)

^k NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^l NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^m BNAI ZION MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

ⁿ RAMBAM MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^o Danielly Clinic   (Israel)

^p Israel   (Israel)

^q ASSAF HAROFEH MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^r Becker and Associates   (United States)

^s BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^t UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^u UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^v HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

^w General Surgery Service

^x General Surgery Service ^*

^y Mathematics and Statistics Department

^z Program in Biostatistics

^aa Statistics and Consulting Unit

more..

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Electrical impedance; Screening

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CANCER SIZE; COHORT ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; ELECTRICAL IMPEDANCE SCANNING; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMPEDANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; PREMENOPAUSE; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; STAFF TRAINING;

ADULT; BIOPSY; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COHORT STUDIES; ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREMENOPAUSE; PROBABILITY; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 38649118510     PISSN: 00224790     EISSN: 10969098     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jso.20931     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. U.S. Census Bureau, Population Division. Table I: Annual Estimates of the Population by Sex and Five-Year Age Groups for the U.S.: April1, 2000 to July 1, 2005 (NC-EST2005-01). May 10, 2006.
2. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al.: Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 1993;270:2444-2450.
3. Kerlikowske K, Carney PA, Geller B, et al.: Performance of screening mammography among women with and without a first-degree relative with breast cancer. Ann Intern Med 2000; 133:856-863.
4. Bobo JK, Lee NC, Thames SF: Findings from 752081 clinical breast examinations reported to a national screening program from 1995 through 1998. JNCI 2000;92:971-976.
5. National Cancer Institute (NCI). Fact Book. 2004.
6. American Cancer Society (ACS). Breast Cancer Facts & Figures 2003-2004. 2003.
7. Saslow D, Runowicz CD, Solomon D, et al.: American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Cervical Neoplasia and Cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 2002;52:342-362.
8. Pharoah PD, Lipscombe JM, Redman KL, et al: Familial predisposition to breast cancer in a British population. Eur J Cancer 2000;36:773-779.
9. Hall IJ, Burke W, Coughlin S, et al.: Population based estimates of family history or breast cancer among women. Community Genet 2001;4:134-142.
10. Verkooijen HM, Chappuis PO, Rapiti E, et al.: Impact of familial risk factors on management and survival of early-onset breast cancer: A population-based study. Br J Cancer 2006;94:231-238.
11. Wright H, Lisiinsky J, Rim A, et al.: Magnetic resonance imaging as a diagnostic tool for breast cancer in premenopausal women. Am J Surg 2005;190:572-575.
12. Kolb TM, Lichy J, Newhouse JH: Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical exam and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them. Radiology 2002; 225:165-175.
13. Park BW, Kim SI, Kim MH, et al.: CBE for screening of asymptomatic women: The importance of clinical breast examination for breast cancer detection. Yonsei Med J 2000;41: 312-318.
14. Zabicki K, Colbert JA, Dominguez FJ, et al.: Breast cancer diagnosis in women ≤40 versus 50 to 60 Years: Increasing size and stage disparity compared with older women over time. Ann Surg Oncol 2006;13:1072-1077.
15. Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, et al.: The natural history of breast carcinoma: What have we learned from screening? Cancer 1999; 86:449-462.
16. Kroenke CH, Rosner B, Chen WY, et al.: Functional impact of breast cancer by age at diagnosis. J Clin Oncol 2004;22:1849-1856.
17. Diebold T, Jacobi V, Scholz B, et al.: Value of electrical impedance scanning (EIS) in the evaluation of BI-RADS III/IV/V-lesions. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2005;4:93-97.
18. Fuchsjaeger MH, Flory D, Reiner CS, et al.: The negative predictive value of electrical impedance scanning in BI-RADS category IV breast lesions. Invest Radiol 2005;40:478-485.
19. Stojadinovic A, Nissan A, Gallimidi Z, et al.: Electrical impedance scanning for the early detection of breast cancer in young women: Preliminary results of a multi-center prospective clinical trial. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2703-2715.
20. Stojadinovic A, Moskovitz O, Gallimidi Z, et al.: Prospective study of electrical impedance scanning for identifying young women at risk for breast cancer. Br Cancer Res Treat 2006;97: 179-189.
21. Piperno GC, Lenington S: Breast electrical impedance and estrogen use in post-menopausal women. Maturitas 2002;41: 17-22.
22. Perlet C, Kessler M, Lenington S, et al.: 2000; Electrical impedance measurements of the breast: Effect of hormonal changes associated with the menstrual cycle. Eur Radiol 10: 1550-1554.
23. Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Deutch BM, et al.: Screening mammography: Value in women 35-39 years old. Am J Radiol 1993;161:53-56.
24. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al.: Effect of age, breast density and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38.
25. Destouet JM, Sherman ML: The medical audit: How we do it. In: Bassett LW, Jackson VP, Jahan R, Fu YS, Gold RH, editors. Diagnosis of diseases of the breast. WB Saunders; 1997; pp 141-148.
26. Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Duffy SW, et al.: The Gothenburg breast screening trial: First results on mortality, incidence and mode of detection for women ages 39-49 years. Cancer 1997;80:2091-2099.
27. Burhenne HJ, et al.: The British Columbia mammography screening program: Evaluation of the first 15 months. Am J Roentgenol 1992;158:45-49.
28. MacKarem G: The effectiveness of the Gail model in estimating risk for development of breast cancer in women under 40 years of age. Breast J 2001;7:34-39.
29. Pharoah PD, Day NE, Duffy S, et al.: Family history and the risk of breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cancer 1997;7:800-809.
30. Collaborative Group on Hormonal Factors in Breast Cancer. Familial breast cancer: Collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58,209 women with breast cancer and 101,986 women without the disease. Lancet 2001;358:1389-1399.
31. Davies RJ, Quinn DA, Davisson TH: Impedance spectroscopy characterizes the electrical signature of benign and malignant breast epithelium. Br Cancer Res Treat 2004;88:S221.
32. Davies RJ, Quinn DA, Davisson TH: Alterations in ionic transport and conductance during malignancy in breast epithelium. Br Cancer Res Treat 2004;88:S222.
33. Scholz B, Anderson R: On electrical impedance scanning - Principles and simulations. Electromedica 2000;68:35-44.
34. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al.: Effect of age, breast density and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276:33-38.
35. Hartmann LC, Sellers TA, Frost MH, et al.: Benign breast disease and the risk of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2005;353: 229-237.
36. Wang J, Constantino J, Tan-Chiu E, et al.: Lower-category benign breast disease and risk of invasive breast cancer. JNCI 2004;96: 616-620.
37. Krieger N, Hiatt RA: Risk of breast cancer after benign breast disease. Am J Epidemiol 1992;136:619-631.
38. Hutchinson WB, Thomas DB, Hamlin WB, et al.: Risk of breast cancer in women with benign breast disease. J Natl Cancer Inst 1980;65:13-20.
39. Potter JF, Slimbaugh WP, Woodward SC: Can breast carcinoma be anticipated? A follow-up of benign breast biopsies. Ann Surg 1968;167:829-838.