Effects of salmon farming on benthic Crustacea;Efectos del cultivo de salmón sobre crustáceous bénticos

Ciencias Marinas

Volumn 33, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 353-366

  Hall Spencer, Jason ^a   Bamber, R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PLYMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

^b DEPARTMENT OF LIFE SCIENCES   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Crustacea; Maerl; Salmon farming; Scotland

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; BENTHOS; BIODIVERSITY; CORALLINE ALGA; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EUROPEAN UNION; FISHERY PRODUCTION; HABITAT FRAGMENTATION; HABITAT USE; HUMAN ACTIVITY; RED ALGA; SALMONID CULTURE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

ALGAE; AUSTROSYRRHOE FIMBRIATUS; COPEPODA; CRUSTACEA; CUMACEA; CUMELLA; LEPTOGNATHIA BREVIREMIS; NANNASTACUS UNGUICULATUS; SOCARNES ERYTHROPHTHALMUS; TANAIDAE; TYPHLOTANAIS MICROCHELES; VAUNTHOMPSONIA CRISTATA;

EID: 38649107862     PISSN: 01853880     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7773/cm.v33i4.1166     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (41)

1. Bamber RN. In press. Tanaidacea. In: Mackie AS, Oliver Pg, Rees EIS (eds.), Benthic Biodiversity in the Southern Irish Sea. Studies in Marine Biodiversity and Systematics from the National Museum of Wales. SWISS SurveyReports.
2. Blake C, Maggs CA. 2003. Comparative growth rates and internal banding periodicity of maerl species (Corallinales, Rhodophyta) from northern Europe. Phycologia 42: 606-612.
3. Bosence DWJ, Wilson J. 2003. Maerl growth, carbonate production rates and accumulation rates in the Northeast Atlantic. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 13: 21-32.
4. Corbera J, Cardell. MJ. 1995. Cumaceans as indicators of eutrophication on soft bottoms. Sci. Mar. 59: 63-69.
5. Cromey CJ, Nickell TD, Black KD, Provost Pg, Griffiths CR. 2002. Validation of a fish farm waste resuspension model by use of a particulate tracer discharged from a point source in a coastal environment. Estuaries 25: 916-929.
6. De Grave S 1999. The influence of sedimentary heterogeneity on within maerl bed differences in infaunal crustacean community. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 49: 153-163.
7. Ernst W, Jackman P, Doe K, Pages F, Julien G, Mackay K, Sutherland T. 2001. Dispersion and toxicity to non-target aquatic organisms of pesticides used to treat sea lice on salmon in net pen enclosures. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 42: 433-444.
8. Fernandes TF, Eleftheriou A, Ackefors H, Eleftheriou M, Ervik A, Sanchez-Mata A, Scanlon T, White P, Cochrane S, Pearson TH, Read PA. 2001. The scientific principles underlying the monitoring of the enviromnental impacts of aquaculture. J. Appl. Ichthyol. 17: 181-193.
9. Foster MS. 2001. Rhodoliths: Between rocks and soft places. J. Phycol. 37: 659-667
10. Foster MS, McConnico LM, Lundsten L, Wadsworth T, Kimball T, Brooks LB, Medina-López M, Riosmena-Rodríguez R, Hernández-Carmona G, Vásquez-Elizondo RM, Johnson S, Steller DL. 2007. Diversity and natural history of a Lithothamnion muelleri-Sargassum horridum community in the Gulf of California. Cienc. Mar. 33: 364-384
11. Foxon GEH. 1936. Notes on the natural history of certain sand-dwelling Cumacea. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 17: 377-393.
12. Freiwald A, Henrich R. 1994. Reefal coralline algal build-ups within the Arctic Circle: Morphology and sedimentary dynamics under extreme environmental seasonality. Sedimentology 41: 963-984.
13. Gamble JC. 1970. Anaerobic survival of the crustaceans Corophium volutator, C. arenarium and Tanais chevreuxi. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 50: 659-671.
14. Grall J, Glémarec M. 1997a. Using biotic indices to estimate macro-benthic community perturbations in the Bay of Brest. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 44: 43-53.
15. Grall J, Glémarec M. 1997b. Biodiversité des fonds de maerl en Bretagne: Approche fonctionnelle et impacts anthropogeniques. Vie Milieu 47: 339-349.
16. Grall J, Hall-Spencer JM. 2003. Problems facing maerl conservation in Brittany. Aquat. Conserv.: Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 13: 55-64.
17. Grall J, Le Loc'h F, Guyonnet B, Riera P. 2006. Community structure and food web based on stable isotopes (δ15N and δ13C) analyses of a Northeastern Atlantic maerl bed. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 338: 1-15.
18. Hall-Spencer JM. 1998. Conservation issues concerning the molluscan fauna of maerl beds. J. Conchol. Spec. Publ. 2: 271-286.
19. Hall-Spencer JM, Atkinson RJA. 1999. Upogebia deltaura (Crustacea, Thallassinidea) in Clyde Sea maerl beds, Scotland. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79: 871-880.
20. Hall-Spencer JM, Moore PG; Sneddon L. 1999. Observations and possible function of the striking anterior colouration pattern of Galathea intermedia (Crustacea: Decapoda: Anomura). J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 79: 371-372.
21. Hall-Spencer JM, Grall J, Moore PG, Atkinson RJA. 2003. Bivalve fishing and maerl-bed conservation in France and the UK: Retrospect and prospect. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshwat. Ecosyst. 13: 33-41.
22. Hall-Spencer JM, White N, Gillespie E, Gillham K, Foggo A. 2006. The impact of fish farms on maerl beds in strongly tidal areas. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 326: 1-9.
23. Hiscock K. 1998. Biological monitoring of marine Special Areas of Conservation: A handbook of methods for detecting change. Joint Nature Conservation Committee, Peterborough.
24. Holmer M, Pérez M, Duarte C. 2003. Benthic primary producers: A neglected environmental problem in Mediterranean mariculture? Mar. Pollut. Bull. 46: 1372-1376.
25. Holmes JMC, Costello MJ, Connor DW. 1997. Crustacea. In: Howson CM, Picton BE (eds.), The Species Directory of the Marine Fauna and Flora of the British Isles and Surrounding Seas. Ulster Museum and the Marine Conservation Society, Belfast and Rosson-Wye, pp. 153-224.
26. Irvine LM, Chamberlain YMC. 1994. Seaweeds of the British Isles. Vol. 1, Part 2B. British Museum (Natural History), London.
27. Jones NS. 1963. The marine fauna of New Zealand: Crustaceans of the order Cumacea. N.Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Mern. 23: 9-80.
28. Keegan BF. 1974. The macrofauna of maerl substrates on the west coast of Ireland. Cah. Biol. Mar. 15: 513-530.
29. Lee HW, Bailey-Brock JH, McGurr MM. 2006. Temporal changes in the polychacte infaunal community surrounding a Hawaiian mariculture operation. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 307: 175-185.
30. Maggs CA, Guiry MD. 1987. Gelidiella calcicola sp. nov. (Rhodophyta) from the British Isles and northern France. Br. Phycol. J. 24: 253-269.
31. Martin S, Clavier J, Chauvaud L, Thouzeau G. 2007. Community metabolism in temperate maerl beds. I. Carbon and carbonate fluxes. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 335: 19-29.
32. Maurer D, Nguyen H, Robertson G, Gerlinger T. 1999. The Infaunal Trophic Index (ITI): Its suitability for environmental monitoring. Ecol. Appl. 9: 699-713.
33. Moore PG. 1973. The kelp fauna of northeast Britain. III. Multivariate classificaton: Turbidity as an ecological factor. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 13: 127-163.
34. Myers AA, McGrath D. 1980. A new species of Stenothoe dana (Amphipoda, Gammeridea) from maerl deposits in Kilkeran Bay. J. Life Sci. R. Dublin Soc. 2: 15-18.
35. Myers AA, McGrath D. 1983. The genus Listriella (Crustacea: Amphipoda) in British and Irish waters, with the description of a new species. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 63: 347-353.
36. Pearson TH, Rosenberg R. 1978. Macrobenthic succession in relation to organic enrichment and pollution in the marine environment. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. Annu. Rev. 16: 229-311.
37. Pearson TH, Black KD. 2001. The environmental impact of marine fish cage culture. In: Black KD (ed.), Environmental Impacts of Aquaculture. Academic Press, Sheffield, pp. 1-31.
38. Pereira PMF, Black KD, McLusky DS, Nickell TD. 2004. Recovery of sediments after cessation of marine fish farm production. Aquaculture 235: 315-330.
39. Ruiz JM, Pérez, M, Romero J. 2001. Effects of fish farm loadings on seagrass (Posidonia oceanica) distribution, growth and photo-synthesis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 42: 749-760.
40. SEPA, Scottish Environmental Protection Agency. 2003. Regulation and monitoring of marine cage fish farming in Scotland: A procedures manual. Downloaded from www.sepa.gov.uk.
41. Wilson S, Blake C, Berges JA, Maggs CA. 2004. Environmental tolerances of free-living coralline algae (maerl): Implications for European maerl conservation. Biol. Conserv. 120: 283-293.