Introduction: Buddhist argumentation

Argumentation

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-14

  Tillemans, Tom J F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 38649084474     PISSN: 0920427X     EISSN: 15728374     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10503-007-9072-9     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Cabezón, José I. 1994. Buddhism and language: A study of Indo-Tibetan scholasticism. SUNY Series toward a comparative philosophy of religion. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
2. Chi, R.S.Y. 1984. Buddhist formal logic. A study of Dignāga's Hetucakra and K'uei-chi's great commentary on the Nyāyapraveśa. Royal Asiatic Society of Great Britain, B.C. Law Trust Fund, Vol. 1. Motilal Barnarsidass, Delhi.
3. Demiéville, Paul. 1987. Le Concile de Lhasa: une controverse sur le quiétisme de l'Inde et de la Chine au VIIIe siècle de l'ère chrétienne. Paris: Collège de France-Institut des hautes études chinoises.
4. Dreyfus, Georges B. 1997. Recognizing reality. Dharmakīrti's philosophy and its Tibetan interpretations. SUNY Series in Buddhist Studies. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
5. Dreyfus, Georges B. 2003. The sound of two hands clapping: The education of a Tibetan Buddhist monk. Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Flew, Anthony. 1971. An introduction to western philosophy. London: Thames and Hudson.
7. Frauwallner, E. 1982. Kleine Schriften, Herausgegeben von Gerhard Oberhammer und Ernst Steinkellner. Wiesbaden: Franz Steiner.
8. Garfield, Jay L. 2002. Empty words, Buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
9. Hattori, M. 1968. Dignāga on perception, being the Pratyakapariccheda of Dignāga's Pramāasamuccaya. Harvard Oriental Series 47. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
10. Hugon, Pascale. 2002. Le rTags kyi rnam gzhag rigs lam gsal ba'i sgron me de Glo bo mkhan chen bSod nams lhun grub. Un manuel tibétain d'introduction à la logique. Wiener Studien zur Tibetologie und Buddhistische Studien 55. Vienna: Arbeitskreis für Tibetische und Buddhistische Studien Universität Wien.
11. Kajiyama, Yūichi. 1958. On the theory of intrinsic determination of universal concomitance in Buddhist logic. Journal of Indian and Buddhist Studies 7(1): 360-364. Reprinted in Kajiyama (1989).
12. Kajiyama, Yūichi. 1966. An introduction to Buddhist philosophy, an annotated translation of the Tarkabhāā of Mokākaragupta. Memoirs of the Faculty of Letters of Kyoto University 10, Kyoto. Reprinted in Kajiyama (1989).
13. Kajiyama, Yūichi. 1989. Studies in Buddhist philosophy. ed. K. Mimaki et al. Kyoto: Rinsen.
14. Liberman, Kenneth. 2004. Dialectical practice in Tibetan philosophical culture: An ethnomethodological inquiry into formal reasoning. Introduction by Harold Garfinkel. Lanham, MD: Rowan and Littlefied.
15. Matilal, Bimal K. 1971. Epistemology, logic, and grammar in Indian philosophical analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
16. Matilal, Bimal K. 1998. The character of logic in India. ed. Jonardon Ganieri and Heeraman Tiwari. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
17. Matilal, Bimal K., and R.D. Evans, eds. 1986. Buddhist logic and epistemology. Studies in the Buddhist analysis of inference and language. Studies of Classical India 7. Dordrecht: Reidel.
18. Mimaki, K. 1976. La Réfutation bouddhique de la permanence des choses (sthirasiddhidūaa) et la preuve de la momentanéité des choses (kaabhagasiddhi). Paris: Publications de l'Institut de Civilisation Indienne 41.
19. Oberhammer, G. 1991. Terminologie der frühen philosophischen Scholastik in Indien. Ein Begriffswörterbuch zur altindischen Dialektik, Erkenntnislehre und Methodologie. With the collaboration of E. Prets and J. Prandstetter. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
20. Oetke, Claus. 1996. Ancient Indian logic as a theory of non-monotonic reasoning. Journal of Indian Philosophy 24.
21. Priest, Graham G. 2002. Beyond the limits of thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Seyfort Ruegg, David. 1989. Buddha-nature, mind and the problem of gradualism in a comparative perspective: On the transmission and reception of Buddhism in India and Tibet. Jordan Lectures in Comparative Religion 13. London: School of Oriental and African Studies, University of London.
23. Stcherbatsky, T. 1930/32. Buddhist Logic. Two volumes. Bibliotheca buddhica 26, Leningrad. Reprinted by Mouton and Co., The Hague, 1958.
24. Steinkellner, E. 1982. The spiritual place of the epistemological tradition in Buddhism. Nanto Bukkyō 49 (Nara, Japan).
25. Steinkellner, E., and T. Much. 1995. Texte der erkenntnistheoretischen Schule des Buddhismus. Systematische Übersicht über die buddhistische Sanskrit-Literatur 2. Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht.
26. Tachikawa, M. 1971. A sixth-century manual of Indian logic (A Translation of the Nyāyapraveśa). Journal of Indian Philosophy 1.
27. Tillemans, Tom J.F. 1993. Persons of authority. The sTon pa tshad ma'i skyes bur sgrub pa'i gtam of A lag sha Ngag dbang bstan dar, a Tibetan Work on the Central Religious Questions in Buddhist Epistemology. Tibetan and Indo-Tibetan Studies 5. Franz Steiner, Stuttgart.
28. Tillemans, Tom J.F. 1999. Scripture, logic, language. Essays on Dharmakīrti and his Tibetan successors. Studies in Indian and Tibetan Buddhism. Boston: Wisdom Publications.
29. Tillemans, Tom J.F. 2000. Dharmakīrti's Pramāavārttika. An annotated translation of the fourth chapter (parārthānumā na). Vol. 1 (k. 1-148). Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften, Philosophisch-Historische Klasse, Sitzungsberichte, 675. Band. Vienna: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.
30. van der Kuijp, Leonard W.J. 1983. Contributions to the development of Tibetan Buddhist epistemology: From the eleventh to the thirteenth century. Alt- und Neu-Indische Studien 26. Franz Steiner, Wiesbaden.