Physicalism as an attitude

Philosophical Studies

Volumn 138, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 1-15

  Ney, Alyssa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Hempel's dilemma; Physicalism

Indexed keywords

EID: 38549162814     PISSN: 00318116     EISSN: 15730883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11098-006-0006-4     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Chomsky, N. (1968). Language and mind. New York: Harcourt Brace and World
2. Chomsky, N. (2000). New horizons in the study of language and mind Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
3. Chomsky, N. (2003). Replies. In L. Antony, & N. Hornstein, (Eds.), Chomsky and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell
4. Chalmers, D. (1996). The conscious mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press
5. Crane, T., & Mellor, D.H. (1990). There is no question of physicalism. Mind, 99, 185-206
6. Crook, S., & Gillett, C. (2001). Why physics alone cannot define the 'Physical': Materialism, metaphysics, and the formulation of physicalism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 31, 333-360
7. Hempel, C. (1966). Philosophy of natural science. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
8. Hempel, C. (1980). Comments on Goodman's ways of worldmaking. Synthese, 45, 193-200
9. Jackson, F. (1998). From metaphysics to ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
10. Lewis, D. (1983). New work for a theory of universals. Reprinted in Papers in metaphysics and epistemology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Locke, J. (1979). An essay concerning human understanding. In P. Nidditch (Ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. Loewer, B. (2001). From physics to physicalism. In C. Gillett, & B. Loewer (Eds.) Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
13. Markosian, N. (2000). What are physical objects? Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 61, 375-395
14. Melnyk A. (1997). How to keep the 'Physical' in physicalism. Journal of Philosophy, 94, 622-637
15. Melnyk, A. (2003). A physicalist manifesto: Thoroughly modern materialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. Montero, B. The body problem. Noûs, 33, 183-200.
17. Montero, B., & Papineau, D. (2005). A defence of the Via Negativa argument for physicalism. Analysis, 65, 233-237
18. Nagel, T. (1986). The view from nowhere. Oxford: Oxford University Press
19. Papineau, D. (2001). The rise of physicalism. In C. Gillett, & B. Loewer (Eds.), Physicalism and its discontents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
20. Pettit, P. (1993). A definition of physicalism. Analysis, 53, 213-223
21. Poland, J. (1994). Physicalism: The Philosophical Foundations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Poland, J. (2003). Chomsky's challenge to physicalism. In L. Antony, & N. Hornstein (Eds.), Chomsky and his critics. Oxford: Blackwell
23. Spurrett, D., & Papineau, D. (1999). A note on the completeness of "Physics". Analysis, 59, 25-29
24. Van Fraassen, B. (2002). The empirical stance. New Haven: Yale University Press
25. Wilson, J. (2005). Supervenience-based formulations of physicalism. Noûs, 29, 426-459.
26. Wilson. J. (forthcoming). On characterizing the physical. Philosophical Studies.