The Tall Buildings Initiative for alternative seismic design

Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 559-567

  Moehle, Jack P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUILDING CODES; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; GROUND EFFECT; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN;

CRITICAL ASPECTS; EARTHQUAKE GROUND MOTIONS;

TALL BUILDINGS;

EID: 38549152776     PISSN: 15417794     EISSN: 15417808     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tal.435     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Abrahamson NA. 2006a. Selecting and scaling accelerograms for dynamic analysis. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, 4-7 September.
2. Abrahamson NA. 2006b. Seismic hazard assessment: problems with current practice and future developments. Proceedings of the First European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, 4-7, September.
3. Adebar P, Mutrie J, DeVall R. 2004. Displacement-based design of concrete wall buildings; the 2004 Canadian Code Provisions. Proceedings, 13th World Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, paper no. 1047.
4. ASCE 7. 2002. Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, SEI/ASCE 702. American Society of Civil Engineers: p. 376.
5. Baker JW. 2006. Conditional mean spectrum for selection and scaling. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Ground Motion Selection and Modification (GMSM) for Nonlinear Analysis. PEER, Berkeley, CA, 27 October.
6. Bray JD, Rodriguez-Marek A. 2004. Characterization of forward-directivity ground motions in the near-fault region. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 24: 815-828.
7. Cornell CA. 2006. Should uniform hazard spectra be used for design? How should design response spectra be determined considering uniform hazard spectra from design maps and hazard deaggregation data. Proceedings of the Third ATC-35/USGS National Earthquake Ground Motion Mapping Workshop, San Mateo, CA, 7-8 December.
8. Eberhard MO, Sozen MA. 1993. Behavior-based method to determine design shear in earthquake-resistant walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE 119(2): 619-640.
9. Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO. 2006. Effective Stiffness of Reinforced Concrete Columns. Research Digest No. 2006-2001, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, 4 pp. FEMA 356. 2000. Prestandard and commentary on the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Report No. FEMA 356, Federal Emergency Management Agency.
10. IBC. 2003. International Building Code. International Code Council: 660 pp.
11. Kabeyasawa T. 1993. Ultimate-state design of wall-frame structures. In Earthquake Resistance of Reinforced Concrete Structures: A Volume Honoring Hiroyuki Aoyama. University of Tokyo Press: Tokyo, Japan, Chapter 4.5, pp. 431-440.
12. LATBSDC. 2006. An Alternative Procedure for Seismic Analysis and Design of Tall Buildings Located in the Los Angeles Region. Los Angeles Tall Buildings Structural Design Council: Los Angeles, CA, 27 pp.
13. Maffei J. 2005. Presentation for LA Tall Buildings Structural Design Council. Rutherford & Chekene: Oakland, CA.
14. Paulay T, Priestley MJN. 1992. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry Buildings. Wiley & Sons: New York, New York.
15. Stewart JP, Chiou SJ, Bray JD, Graves RW, Somerville PG, Abrahamson NA. 2001. Ground motion evaluation procedures for performance-based design. PEER-2001/09. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California: Berkeley, CA.
16. UBC. 1997. Uniform Building Code, Vol. 2. International Council of Building Officials: Whittier, CA, 492 pp.
17. SEAONC. 2007. SEAONC Recommended Administrative Bulletin for San Francisco. Structural Engineers Association of Northern California: San Francisco, CA.
18. SFBC. 2001. San Francisco Building Code. San Francisco, CA.