Competition and investment in telecommunications

Applied Economics

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 303-313

  Jung, Inung ^a   Gayle, Philip G ^b   Lehman, Dale ^c  

^a SK Telecom   (South Korea)

^b KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c ALASKA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION (ECONOMICS); COMPETITIVENESS; INDUSTRIAL INVESTMENT; INVESTMENT INCENTIVE; MARKET DEVELOPMENT; PANEL DATA; TELECOMMUNICATION;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 38549143228     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840600592882     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Abel, JR (2000) The performance of the state telecommunications industry under price-cap regulation: An assessment of the empirical evidence
2. Abel, JR and Clements, M. (1998) A time series and cross-sectional classification of state regulatory policy adopted for local exchange carriers
3. Abel, JR and Clements, M. (2001) Entry under asymmetric regulation. Review of Industrial Organization, 19, pp. 227-242.
4. Ahn, SC and Schmidt, P. (1995) Efficient estimation of dynamic panel data models with pooled cross-section time series data. Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp. 5-27.
5. Ai, C. and Sappington, D. (2002) The impact of incentive regulation on the U.S. telecommunications industry. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 22, pp. 133-160.
6. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Nicoletti, G. and Schiantarelli, F. (2002) Regulation and investments
7. Alexander, I., Mayer, C. and Weeds, H. (1996) Regulatory structure and risk: An international comparison
8. Alvarez, J. and Arellano, M. (2003) The time series and cross-section asymptotics of dynamic panel data estimators. Econometrica, 71, pp. 1121-1159.
9. Arellano, M. and Bond, S. (1991) Some test of specification for a panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equation. Review of Economics Studies, 58, pp. 277-297.
10. Arellano, M. and Bover, O. (1995) Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error-component models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, pp. 29-51.
11. Baltagi, BH (2001) Econometric Analysis of Panel Data, Wiley, New York
12. Banerjee, A. (2003) Does incentive regulation 'cause' degradation of retail telephone service quality?. Information Economics and Policy, 15, pp. 243-269.
13. Blundell, R. and Bond, S. (1998) Initial conditions and moment restrictions on dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, pp. 115-143.
14. Bohlin, E., Garrone, P. and Andersson, E. (2004) Investment
15. Braunstein, Y. (2002) UNE-P benefits update: SBC's California territory
16. Cave, M. and Vogelsang, I. (2003) How access pricing and entry interact. Telecommunications Policy, 27, pp. 717-727.
17. Chang, H., Koski, H. and Majumdar, SK (2003) Regulation and investment behaviour in the telecommunications sector: Policies and patterns in US and Europe. Telecommunications Policy, 27, pp. 677-699.
18. Ekelund Jr, RB and Ford, GS (2002) Preliminary evidence on the demand for unbundled elements in telephony. Atlantic Economic Journal, 30, p. 443.
19. Ford, GS (2002) A fox in the hen house: An evaluation of bell company proposals to eliminate their monopoly position in local telecommunications markets
20. Ford, GS and Pelcovits, MD (2002) Unbundling and facilities-based entry by CLECs: Two empirical tests
21. Gabel, DJ and Huang, G-L (2003) Promoting innovation: Impact of local competition and regulation of deployment of advanced telecommunications services for business
22. Greene, W. (2002) LIMDEP version 8.0 econometric modeling guide
23. Griffiths, WE, Hill, RC and Judge, GG (1993) Learning and Practicing Econometrics, John Wiley and Sons, New York
24. Haring, J., Rettle, ML, Rohlfs, JH and Shooshan III, HM (2002) UNE prices and telecommunications investment
25. Hassett, AK and Kotlikoff, LJ (2002) The role of competition in stimulating telecom investment
26. Hatfield, DE and Gardner, DE (1997) An essay on competition
27. Hausman, JA and Taylor, WE (1981) Panel data and unobservable individual effects. Econometrica, 49, pp. 1377-1398.
28. Holz-Eakin, D. (1988) Testing for individual effects in autoregressive models. Journal of Econometrics, 39, pp. 297-307.
29. Lehman, DL (2003) (How) Do regulated prices affect competitive entry? Info 5
30. Lehman, DL (2004) Investment and the Level of UNE-P Rates: A Critique of the Willig Study, Alaska Pacific University, mimeo
31. Lehman, DL and Weisman, DL (2000) The political economy of price cap regulation. Review of Industrial Organization, 16
32. Lehman, DL and Weisman, DL (2000) the Telecommunication Act of 1996: The 'Costs' of Managed Competition, Chapter 7, Kluwer, Boston
33. Mandy, D. (2000) Killing the goose that may have laid the golden egg: only the data knows whether sabotage pays. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 17, pp. 157-172.
34. Sappington, DEM (2002) Price regulation. Handbook of Telecommunications Economics, pp. 227-293. North- Holland, Amsterdam
35. Sappington, DEM (2003) The effects of incentive regulation on retail telephone service quality in the United States. Review of Network Economics, 2, pp. 355-383.
36. Sappington, DEM and Weisman, DL (1996) Designing Incentive Regulation for the Telecommunications Industry, M.I.T. Press and Washington D.C. AEI Press, Cambridge
37. Telecom Policy Report (2004)
38. Telecom Policy Report (2003)
39. Weisman, DL (2005) Price regulation and quality. Information Economics and Policy, 17, pp. 165-174.
40. Weisman, DL (2002) Strategic sharing in regulatory regimes. Economics Letters, 75, pp. 361-367.
41. Willig, DR, Lehr, WH, Bigelow, JP and Levinson, SB (2002) Simulating Investment and Telecommunications Act of 1996, Princeton University, mimeo
42. Woroch, G. (2000) Competition's effect on investment in digital infrastructure