The effects of custodial vs non-custodial sanctions on reoffending: Lessons from a systematic review

Psicothema

Volumn 20, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 29-34

  Killias, Martin ^a   Villetaz, Patrice ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRIME; CUSTODY; HUMAN; RECURRENT DISEASE; REVIEW; SOCIOPATHY;

CRIME; CUSTODIAL CARE; HUMANS; RECURRENCE; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR DISORDERS;

EID: 38549141637     PISSN: 02149915     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (30)

1. Aebi, M.F. (2006). Comment mesurer la délinquance? Paris: Armand Colin.
2. Brennan, P.A., & Mednick S.A. (1994). Learning theory approach to the deterrence of criminal recidivism. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 103(3), 430-440.
3. Cornish, D. (1987). Evaluating residential treatments for delinquents: A cautionary tale. In K. Hurrelmann, F.-X. Kaufmann & F. Lösel (Eds.): Social intervention: Potential and constraints. New York/Berlin: de Gruyter, 333-345.
4. Empey, L.T., & Lubeck St.G. (1971). The Silverlake Experiment, Aldine, Chicago.
5. Erez, E. (1985). Random assignment. The least fair of them all: Prisoners' attitudes towards various criteria of selection. Criminology, 23(2), 365-379.
6. Fehr, E., & Rockenbach, B. (2003). Detrimental effects of sanctions on human altruism. Nature, 422, 137-140.
7. Henning, K.R., & Frueh, B.C. (1996). Cognitive-behavioural treatment of incarcerated offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 23, 523-541.
8. Israel, M., & Chui, W.H. (2006). If 'something works' is the answer, what is the question? Supporting pluralist evaluation in community corrections in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Criminologv, 3, 181-200.
9. Killias, M., Aebi, M.F., & Ribeaud, D. (2000). Does community service rehabilitate better than short-term imprisonment? Results of a controlled experiment. The Howard J. of Criminal Justice, 39, 40-57.
10. Kuhn, A. (2000). Détenus: Combine? Pourquoi? Que faire? Bern (Switzerland): Haupt.
11. Lamb, R.R., & Goertzel, V. (1974). Ellsworth House: A Community Alternative to Jail. American Journal of Psychiatry, 131(1), 64-68.
12. Little, M., Kogan, J., Bullock, R., & Van der Laan, P. (2004). ISSP: An experiment in multi-systemic responses in persistent young offenders known to children's services. British J. of Criminology, 44(2), 225-240.
13. Lum, C., Kennedy, L.W., & Sherley, A. (2008). Is counter-terrorism policy evidence-based? What works, what harms, and what is unknown. Psicothema, 20(1), 35-42.
14. McCord, J. (1990). Crime in moral and social contexts. Criminology, 28(1), 1-26.
15. Ortmann, R. (1994). Zur Evaluation der Sozialtherapie. Ergebnisse einer experimentellen Längsschnittstudie zu Justizvollzugsanstalten des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen. Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft, 106, 782-821.
16. Ortmann, R. (2000). The effectiveness of social therapy in prison. A randomised experiment. Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 214-232.
17. Paternoster, R., Bachman, R., Brame, R., & Sherman, L.W. (1997). Do fair procedures matter? The effect of procedural justice on spouse assault. Law & Society Review, 31, 163-204.
18. Perneger, T.V., Giner, F., Del Río, M., & Mino, A. (1998). Randomised trial of heroin maintenance programme for addicts who fail in conventional drug treatment. British Medical Journal, 3(17), 13-18.
19. Petrosino, A., & Soydan, H. (2005). The impact of program developers as evaluators on criminal recidivism. Results from meta-analyses of experimental and quasi-experimental research. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(4), 435-450.
20. Smith, P., Goggin, C., & Gendreau, P. (2002). Effets de l'incarcération et des sanctions intermédiaires sur la récidive: Effets généraux et différences individuelles, Ottawa: Solicitor General of Canada 2002.
21. Van der Werff, N. (1979). Speziale preventie. The Hague: WODC
22. Van der Werff, N. (1981). Recidivism and special deterrence. British Journal of Criminology 21(2), 136-147.
23. Vennard, D.J., Hedderman, C., & Sugg, D. (1997). Changing offenders' attitudes and behaviour: What works? London: Home Office (Research Findings no 61).
24. Villettaz, P., & Killias, M. (2005). Les arrêts domiciliaires sous surveillance électronique: Une sanction «expérimentale», Lausanne: Institute of Criminology and Penal Law of the University of Lausanne.
25. Villettaz, P., Killias, M., & Zoder, I. (2006). The effects of custodial vs. non-custodial sanctions on re-offending. A systematic review of the state of knowledge, Campbell Collaboration Crime and Justice Group (under review).
26. Walker, N., Farrington, D.P., & Tucker, G. (1981). Reconviction rates of adult males after different sentences. British Journal of Criminology, 21(4), 357-360.
27. Weisburd, D. (2000). Randomized experiments in criminal justice: Prospects and problems. Crime and Delinquency, 46(2), 181-193.
28. Weisburd, D., Petrosino, A., & Mason, G. (1993). Design sensitivity in criminal justice experiments. Crime and Justice, 17, 337-379.
29. Welsh, B.C., & Farrington, D.P. (2005). Evidence-based crime prevention: Conclusions and directions for a safer society, Canadian Journal of Criminology, 47(2), 337-354.
30. Wilkins, L.T. (1969). Evaluation of Penal Measures. New York: Random House.