Specification and complexity of strategic-based reasoning using argumentation

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4766 LNAI, Issue , 2007, Pages 142-150

  Mbarki, Mohamed ^a   Bentahar, Jamal ^b   Moulin, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

^b Concordia Institute for Information Systems Engineering ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL COMPLEXITY; DECISION THEORY; POLYNOMIALS; STRATEGIC PLANNING;

STRATEGIC REASONING; STRATEGIC-FREE ARGUMENTATION REASONING;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 38549110570     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-75526-5_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N., Parsons, S.: Modelling dialogues using argumentation. In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 31-38. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2000)
2. Amgoud, L., Maudet, N.: Strategical considerations for argumentative agents (preliminary report). In: Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Non-Monotonic Reasoning, pp. 409-417 (2002)
3. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: A dialogue game protocol for multi-agent argument over proposals for action. Journal of AAMAS. Special issue on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems 11(2), 153-171 (2005)
4. Bentahar, J.: A pragmatic and semantic unified framework for agent communication. PhD Thesis, Laval University, Canada (May 2005)
5. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Chaib-draa, B.: Commitment and argument, network: a new formalism for agent communication. In: Dignum, F.P.M. (ed.) ACL 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2922, pp. 146-165. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
6. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Meyer, J-J.Ch., Chaib-draa, B.: A logical model for commitment and argument network for agent communication. In: Proc. of the 3rd Int. Joint, Conf. on AAMAS, pp. 792-799 (2004)
7. Bentahar, J., Moulin, B., Meyer, J.-J.C., Lespérance, Y.: A new logical semantics for agent communication. In: Inoue, K., Satoh, K., Toni, F. (eds.) CLIMA VII. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4371, pp. 151-170. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
8. Besnard, P., Hunter, A.: A logic-based theory of deductive arguments. Artificial Intelligence 128, 203-235 (2001)
9. Chesñevar, C.I., Maguitman, A., Loui, R.: Logical models of argument. ACM Computing Surveys 32, 337-383 (2000)
10. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: based on agents, founded in logic, PhD Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands (2004)
11. Dung, P.M., Kowalski, R.A., Toni, F.: Dialectic proof procedures for assumption-based, admissible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 170(2), 114-159 (2006)
12. Flieger, J.C.: Relevance and minimality in systems of defeasible argumentation. Internal Report. Imperial College of Science, Technology and Medecin (2002)
13. Goldratt, E.: Theory of Constraints. North River Press (1999)
14. Kakas, A., Moraitis, P.: Argumentation based decision making for autonomous agents. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on AAMAS, pp. 883-890 (2003)
15. Kakas, A., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P.: Layered strategies and protocols for argumentation-based agent interaction. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 64-77. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
16. Maudet, N., Chaib-draa, B.: Commitment-based and dialogue-game based protocols: new trends in agent communication languages. The Knowledge Engineering Review 17(2), 157-179 (2002)
17. Moulin, B., Irandoust, I., Bélanger, M., Desbordes, G.: Explanation and argumentation capabilities: towards the creation of more persuasive agents. Artificial Intelligence Revue 17(3), 169-222 (2002)
18. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In: Proc. of the 1st Int. Joint Conf. on AAMAS, pp. 402-409 (2002)
19. McBurney, P., van Eijk, R.M., Parsons, S., Amgoud, L.: A dialogue game protocol for agent purchase negotiations. Journal of AAMAS 7(3), 235-273 (2003)
20. Moore, D.: Dialogue game theory for intelligent tutoring systems. PhD Thesis, Leeds Mitropolitan University, England (1993)
21. Papadimitriou, C.H.: Computational Complexity. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1994)
22. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: On the outcomes of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Proc. of the 2nd Int. Joint Conf. on AAMAS, pp. 616-623 (2003)
23. Parsons, S., McBurney, P., Wooldridge, M.: Some preliminary steps towards a meta-theory for formal inter-agent dialogues. In: Rahwan, L, Moraïtis, P., Reed, C (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 1-18. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
24. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: Properties and Complexity of Some Formal Inter-agent Dialogues. J. Log. Comput. 13(3), 347-376 (2003)
25. Prakken, H., Vreeswijk, G.: Logics for defeasible argumentation, 2nd edn. Handbook of Philosophical Logic (2000)
26. Rahwan, I., Ramchurn, S.D., Jennings, N.R., McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Sonenberg, L.: Argumentation-based negotiation. The Knowledge Engineering Review 18(4), 343-375 (2003)
27. Rahwan, I., McBurney, P., Sonenberg, L.: Towards a theory of negotiation strategy (a preliminary report). In: Proc. of the Workshop on Game Theoretic and Decision Theoretic Agents (2003)
28. Reed, C., Walton, D.: Towards a Formal and Implemented Model of argumentation schemes in Agent Communication. In: Rahwan, I., Moraïtis, P., Reed, C. (eds.) ArgMAS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3366, pp. 19-30. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
29. Rovatsos, M., Rahwan, I., Fischer, F., Weiss, G.: Adaptive strategies for practical argument-based negotiation. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4049, pp. 122-137. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
30. Sadri, F., Toni, F., Torroni, P.: Dialogues for negotiation: agent varieties and dialogue sequences. In: Meyer, J.-J.C., Tambe, M. (eds.) ATAL 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2333, pp. 405-421. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
31. Searle, J.R.: Speech acts: an essay in the philosophy of languages. Cambridge University Press, England (1969)
32. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication, LNCS(LNAI), vol. 1916, pp. 31-45. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
33. van Dijk, T.A., Kintsch, W.: Strategies of Discourse Comprehension. Academic Press, New York (1983)
34. van Rooy, R.: Relevance of communicative acts. In: Proc. of TARK VIII, pp. 83-96 (2001)