Correlation between centralization or peripheralization of symptoms in low back pain and the results of magnetic resonance imaging;Zależność pomiȩdzy centralizacja̧ i peryferalizacja̧ objawów w lȩdźwiobólach a obrazami rezonansu magnetycznego

Ortopedia Traumatologia Rehabilitacja

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 531-536

  Ra̧pała, Aleksandra ^a,b   Ra̧pała, Kazimierz ^a   Łukawski, Stanisław ^a  

^a MEDICAL CENTER FOR POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION   (Poland)

^b NONE   (Poland)

Author keywords

Diagnostics; McKenzie method; Results; Spine

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENTRALIZATION; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HERNIA; HUMAN; LOW BACK PAIN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NERVE ROOT COMPRESSION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; VERTEBRAL CANAL STENOSIS;

EID: 38549105039     PISSN: 15093492     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. McKenzie RA. Understanding centralization. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy. 1999; 29 (8): 487-489.
2. McKenzie RA. The lumbar spine. Mechanical Diagnosis and Therapy. Spinal publications, New Zealand. 1981.
3. Stengert T, Milanowska K. Biomechaniczna diagnostyka funkcjonalna metoda̧ McKenziego. Post. Reh. 1998; 12: 59-65.
4. Stengert T. Wiktora Degi Ortopedia i Rehabilitacja. pod. red. Marciniak W, Szulc A, Warszawa, PZWL Tom II, 2004: 334-342.
5. Sous M, Stryła W. Wartość kinezyterapii w leczeniu chorych z przepuklina̧ ja̧dra miażdżystego w czȩści lȩdźwiowej. Post Reh 1999; 13: 53-63.
6. Gieremek K. Zastosowanie metody McKenzie w terapii pacjentów z dyskopatia̧ dolnego odcinka krȩgosłupa. Post Reh 1994; 8: 607-614.
7. Kilijan W. Ocena skuteczności terapii metoda̧ McKenziego osób z dyskopochodnym zespolem bólowym dolnego odcinka krȩgoslupa. Praca Doktorska. AWF, Kraków, 2004.
8. Donelson R, Silva G, Murphy K. The centralization phenomenon: Its usefulness in evaluating and treating referred pain. Spine 1990; 15: 211-213.
9. Donelson R, Mark W, Dennis LH. Centralization Phenomenon as a Prognostic Factor for Chronic Low Back Pain and Disability Spine 2001; 26: 758-765.
10. Long A. The centralization phenomenon: its usefulness as a predictor of outcome in conservative treatment of chronic low back pain (a pilot study) Spine 1995; 20 (23): 2513-2521.
11. Werneke M, Hart DL. Centralization phenomenon as a prognostic factor for chronic low back pain and disability. Spine 2001; 26 (7): 758-765.
12. Saal JA. Natural History and Nonoperative Treatment of Lumbar Disc Hernitation. Spine 1996; 21: 28-98.
13. The Quebec Task Force Classification for Spinal Disorders and the Severity, Treatment, and Outcomes of Sciatica and Lumbar Spinal Stenosis. Spine 1996; 21 (24): 2885-2892.
14. Brotz D, Kuker W, Maschke E et. al. A prospective trial of mechanical physiotherapy for lumbar disk prolapse. J Neurol 2003; 250: 746-749.
15. Frymoyer JW, Newberg A, Pope MH. et al. Spine radiographs in patients with low-back pain. An epidemiological study in men. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1984; 66 (7): 1048-1055.
16. Meschan I. An Atlas of Anatomy Basic to Radiology. Philadelphia: WB; Saunders Company 1975, 521-556.
17. Pevsner PH, Odra S, Radcliff W. et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbar spine. A comparison with computed tomography and myelography. Acta Radiol Suppl 1986; 369: 706-707.
18. Boden SD, Davis DO, Dina TS. et al. Abnormal magnetic-resonance scans of the lumbar spine in asymptomatic subjects: a prospective investigation. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 1990; 72: 403-408.
19. McRae DL. Asymptomatic intervertebral disc protrusions. Acta Radiol 1956; 46: 9-27.
20. Powell MC, Wilson M, Szypryt P. et al. Prevalence of lumbar disc degeneration observed by magnetic resonance in symptomless women. Lancet 1986; 2: 1366-1367.
21. Vroomen PC, Wilmink JT, de Krom MC. Prognostic value of MRI findings in sciatica. Neuroradiology 2002; 44 (1): 59-63.