-
1
-
-
0035796040
-
Caesarean section for fetal distress
-
James D. Caesarean section for fetal distress. BMJ 322 (2001) 1316-1317
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.322
, pp. 1316-1317
-
-
James, D.1
-
2
-
-
0035796022
-
Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section - are current standards achievable?
-
Tuffnell D.J., Wilkinson K., and Beresford N. Interval between decision and delivery by caesarean section - are current standards achievable?. BMJ 322 (2001) 1330-1333
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.322
, pp. 1330-1333
-
-
Tuffnell, D.J.1
Wilkinson, K.2
Beresford, N.3
-
3
-
-
0347623281
-
Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines
-
Chauhan S.P., Magann E.F., Scott J.R., Scardo J.A., Hendrix N.W., and Martin Jr. J.N. Emergency cesarean delivery for nonreassuring fetal heart rate tracings. Compliance with ACOG guidelines. J Reprod Med 48 (2003) 975-981
-
(2003)
J Reprod Med
, vol.48
, pp. 975-981
-
-
Chauhan, S.P.1
Magann, E.F.2
Scott, J.R.3
Scardo, J.A.4
Hendrix, N.W.5
Martin Jr., J.N.6
-
5
-
-
1642357949
-
National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section
-
Thomas J., Paranjothy S., and James D. National cross sectional survey to determine whether the decision to delivery interval is critical in emergency caesarean section. BMJ 328 (2004) 665
-
(2004)
BMJ
, vol.328
, pp. 665
-
-
Thomas, J.1
Paranjothy, S.2
James, D.3
-
6
-
-
33746882840
-
Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes
-
Bloom S.L., Leveno K.J., Spong C.Y., Gilbert S., Hauth J.C., Landon M.B., et al. Decision-to-incision times and maternal and infant outcomes. Obstet Gynecol 108 (2006) 6-11
-
(2006)
Obstet Gynecol
, vol.108
, pp. 6-11
-
-
Bloom, S.L.1
Leveno, K.J.2
Spong, C.Y.3
Gilbert, S.4
Hauth, J.C.5
Landon, M.B.6
-
7
-
-
38549150366
-
Effective system of mobilisation is used in Singapore (letter)
-
Wee H.Y., and Quek S.C. Effective system of mobilisation is used in Singapore (letter). BMJ 323 (2001) 930
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 930
-
-
Wee, H.Y.1
Quek, S.C.2
-
8
-
-
38549103187
-
Caesarean section urgency - use clinical definitions (letter)
-
Kinsella S.M., Lucas D.N., Yentis S.M., Holdcroft A., May A.E., Wee M., et al. Caesarean section urgency - use clinical definitions (letter). BMJ 323 (2001) 930
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 930
-
-
Kinsella, S.M.1
Lucas, D.N.2
Yentis, S.M.3
Holdcroft, A.4
May, A.E.5
Wee, M.6
-
9
-
-
0345220701
-
Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification
-
Lucas D.N., Yentis S.M., Kinsella S.M., Holdcroft A., May A.E., Wee M., and Robinson P.N. Urgency of caesarean section: a new classification. J R Soc Med 93 (2000) 346-350
-
(2000)
J R Soc Med
, vol.93
, pp. 346-350
-
-
Lucas, D.N.1
Yentis, S.M.2
Kinsella, S.M.3
Holdcroft, A.4
May, A.E.5
Wee, M.6
Robinson, P.N.7
-
10
-
-
38549141740
-
Don't throw the baby out with the bath water (letter)
-
Griffiths M., and Sharma B. Don't throw the baby out with the bath water (letter). BMJ 323 (2001) 930
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 930
-
-
Griffiths, M.1
Sharma, B.2
-
11
-
-
0030745459
-
Caesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?
-
Chauhan S.P., Roach H., Naef II R.W., Magann E.F., Morrison J.C., and Martin Jr. J.N. Caesarean section for suspected fetal distress. Does the decision-incision time make a difference?. J Reprod Med 42 (1997) 347-352
-
(1997)
J Reprod Med
, vol.42
, pp. 347-352
-
-
Chauhan, S.P.1
Roach, H.2
Naef II, R.W.3
Magann, E.F.4
Morrison, J.C.5
Martin Jr., J.N.6
-
12
-
-
0035090294
-
How long does it takes to deliver a baby by emergency caesarean section?
-
Spencer M.K., and MacLennan A.H. How long does it takes to deliver a baby by emergency caesarean section?. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 41 (2001) 7-11
-
(2001)
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.41
, pp. 7-11
-
-
Spencer, M.K.1
MacLennan, A.H.2
-
13
-
-
0036559252
-
What is a reasonnable time for decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries
-
MacKenzie I.Z., and Cooke I. What is a reasonnable time for decision-to-delivery by caesarean section? Evidence from 415 deliveries. BJOG 109 (2002) 498-504
-
(2002)
BJOG
, vol.109
, pp. 498-504
-
-
MacKenzie, I.Z.1
Cooke, I.2
-
14
-
-
0036561206
-
The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 min a realistic target?
-
Helmy W.H., Jolaoso A.S., Ifaturoti O.O., Afify S.A., and Jones M.H. The decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean section: is 30 min a realistic target?. BJOG 109 (2002) 505-508
-
(2002)
BJOG
, vol.109
, pp. 505-508
-
-
Helmy, W.H.1
Jolaoso, A.S.2
Ifaturoti, O.O.3
Afify, S.A.4
Jones, M.H.5
-
15
-
-
0036282787
-
Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections-completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital
-
Bruce D., Stone S., and Harding K. Evaluation of emergency caesarean sections-completion of the audit cycle in a Central London teaching hospital. J Obstet Gynaecol 22 (2002) 273-278
-
(2002)
J Obstet Gynaecol
, vol.22
, pp. 273-278
-
-
Bruce, D.1
Stone, S.2
Harding, K.3
-
16
-
-
0042233537
-
Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min: evidence from 10 years
-
Hillemanns P., Hasbargen U., Strauss A., Schulze A., Genzel-Boroviczeny O., and Hepp H. Maternal and neonatal morbidity of emergency caesarean sections with a decision-to-delivery interval under 30 min: evidence from 10 years. Arch Gynecol Obstet 268 (2003) 136-141
-
(2003)
Arch Gynecol Obstet
, vol.268
, pp. 136-141
-
-
Hillemanns, P.1
Hasbargen, U.2
Strauss, A.3
Schulze, A.4
Genzel-Boroviczeny, O.5
Hepp, H.6
-
18
-
-
38549125579
-
Interval between decision and delivery can be shortened (letter)
-
Aguillera A., Barlow P., and Rozenberg S. Interval between decision and delivery can be shortened (letter). BMJ 323 (2001) 930
-
(2001)
BMJ
, vol.323
, pp. 930
-
-
Aguillera, A.1
Barlow, P.2
Rozenberg, S.3
-
19
-
-
33745019890
-
Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1000 emergency caesarean sections
-
Livermore L.J., and Cochrane R.M. Decision to delivery interval: a retrospective study of 1000 emergency caesarean sections. J Obstet Gynecol 26 (2006) 307-310
-
(2006)
J Obstet Gynecol
, vol.26
, pp. 307-310
-
-
Livermore, L.J.1
Cochrane, R.M.2
-
20
-
-
33745001439
-
Predictions for the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean sections in Norway
-
Kolas T., Hofoss D., and Oian P. Predictions for the decision-to-delivery interval for emergency caesarean sections in Norway. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 85 (2006) 561-566
-
(2006)
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand
, vol.85
, pp. 561-566
-
-
Kolas, T.1
Hofoss, D.2
Oian, P.3
-
21
-
-
0028214631
-
Emergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesia
-
Quinn A.J., and Kilpatrick A. Emergency caesarean section during labour: response times and type of anaesthesia. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 31 (1994) 25-29
-
(1994)
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol
, vol.31
, pp. 25-29
-
-
Quinn, A.J.1
Kilpatrick, A.2
-
22
-
-
0038038589
-
Time required for surgical readiness in emergency caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia
-
McCahon R.A., and Catling S. Time required for surgical readiness in emergency caesarean section: spinal compared with general anaesthesia. Int J Obstet Anesth 12 (2003) 178-182
-
(2003)
Int J Obstet Anesth
, vol.12
, pp. 178-182
-
-
McCahon, R.A.1
Catling, S.2
-
23
-
-
0041742492
-
Whose distress is it anyway ? 'Fetal distress' and the 30-min rule
-
Yentis S.M. Whose distress is it anyway ? 'Fetal distress' and the 30-min rule. Anaesthesia 58 (2003) 732-733
-
(2003)
Anaesthesia
, vol.58
, pp. 732-733
-
-
Yentis, S.M.1
-
24
-
-
0442278344
-
A response to 'Whose distress is it anyway ? 'Fetal distress' and the 30-min rule'
-
George A. A response to 'Whose distress is it anyway ? 'Fetal distress' and the 30-min rule'. Anaesthesia 59 (2004) 202
-
(2004)
Anaesthesia
, vol.59
, pp. 202
-
-
George, A.1
|