Nomenclatural considerations in naming species of Aspergillus and its teleomorphs

Studies in Mycology

Volumn 59, Issue , 2007, Pages 67-70

  Pitt, John ^a   Samson, R A ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b CBS KNAW FUNGAL BIODIVERSITY CENTRE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Accepted Aspergillus names; Conservation of names; Dual nomenclature; Protocol for species description

Indexed keywords

ASPERGILLUS; PENICILLIUM;

EID: 38549100227     PISSN: 01660616     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3114/sim.2007.59.08     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Cline E (2005). Implications of changes to Article 59 of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature enacted at the Vienna Congress, 2005. Inoculum 56: 3-5.
2. Gams W, Korf RP, Pitt JI, Hawksworth DL, Berbee ML, Kirk PM (edited by Seifert K) (2003). Has dual nomenclature for fungi run its course? The Article 59 debate. Mycotaxon 88: 493-508.
3. Gams W (2005). Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi: a rebuttal. Inoculum 56: 1-3.
4. Greuter W, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Hawksworth DL, Jørgensen PM, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Trehane P, McNeill J (eds) (1994). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code) adopted by the Fifteenth International Botanical Congress, Yokohama, August-September, 1993. Regnum Vegetabile 131: 1-389.
5. Greuter W, Budet HM, Chaloner WG, Demoulin V, Grolle R, Hawksworth DL, Nicolson DH, Silva PC, Stafleu FA, Voss EG, McNeill J (eds) (1988). International Code of Botanical Nomenclature adopted by the Fourteenth International Botanical Congress, Berlin, July-August, 1987. Regnum Vegetabile 118: 1-326.
6. Hawksworth DL (1988). Improved stability for biological nomenclature. Nature 334: 301.
7. Hawksworth DL (1991). Lists of Names in Current Use - a new initiative to address a continuing problem. Mycotaxon 40: 445-458.
8. Hawksworth DL (ed.) (1991). Improving the stability of names: needs and options. Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books.
9. st century. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 109: 543-567.
10. Hawksworth DL (1993). Protected names in current use - a benefit or a threat to the taxonomist? Cryptogamie Mycologie 14: 149-157.
11. Hawksworth DL (2004). Limitation of dual nomenclature for pleomorphic fungi. Taxon 53: 596-598.
12. Kozakiewicz Z, Frisvad JC, Hawksworth DL, Pitt, JI, Samson RA, Stolk AC (1992). Proposals for nomina specifica conservanda and rejicienda in Aspergillus and Penicillium (Fungi). Taxon 41: 109-113.
13. Peterson SW (2000). Phylogenetic relationships in Aspergillus based on rDNA sequence analysis. In: Integration of modern taxonomic methods for Penicillium and Aspergillus classification. (Samson RA, Pitt JI, eds.) Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers: 323-355.
14. Pitt JI (1979). The genus Penicillium and its teleomorphic States Eupenicillium and Talaromyces. London: Academic Press.
15. Pitt, JI, Hocking, AD (1997). Fungi and Food Spoilage. 2nded. Blackie Academic & Professional, London.
16. Pitt JI, Samson RA (1993). Species names in current use in the Trichocomaceae (Fungi, Eurotiales). In: Names in current use in the families Trichocomaceae, Cladoniaceae, Pinaceae, and Lemnaceae. (Greuter W, ed.) Königstein, Germany: Koeltz Scientific Books: 13-57 (Regnum Vegetabile 128: 13-57).
17. Raper KB, Thom C (1949). A Manual of the Penicillia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
18. Rossman AY, Samuels GJ (2005). Towards a single scientific name for species of fungi. Inoculum 56: 1-3.
19. Samson RA, Hoekstra ES, Frisvad, JC, 2004. Introduction to Food- and Airborne Fungi. 7th edition. Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
20. Samson RA, Varga J, Witiak S, Geiser D (2007). The species concept in Aspergillus: recommendation of an international panel. Studies in Mycology 59: 71-73.
21. Thom C (1930). The Penicillia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.