How Do Patients Perceive the Benefits and Risks of Peripheral Angioplasty? Implications for Informed Consent

Journal of Vascular and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 177-181

  Habib, Said B ^a   Sonoda, Luke ^b   See, Teik C ^b   Ell, Peter J ^c   Groves, Ashley M ^c  

^a NOTTINGHAM UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^b ADDENBROOKE S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOPLASTY; ARTICLE; EMERGENCY SURGERY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANGIOPLASTY, BALLOON; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 38549090628     PISSN: 10510443     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.10.016     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Comerota A.J. Endovascular and surgical revascularization for patients with intermittent claudication. Am J Cardiol 87 (2001) 34D-43D
2. Cousins C., and Sharp C. Medical interventional procedures: reducing the radiation risks. Clin Radiol 59 (2004) 468-473
3. BMJ 327 (2003) 691-724
4. Picarno E. Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: how to escape from a communication inferno. BMJ 329 (2004) 849-851
5. Groves A.M., Kayani I., Syed R., Nagabushan N., Gacinovic S., and Ell P.J. Myocardial perfusion scintigraphy: patients' perception of benefit and risk. Nucl Med Comm 25 (2004) 1219-1222
6. Agard A. Informed consent: theory versus practice. Nat Clin Pract Cardiovasc Med 2 (2005) 270-271
7. Axisa B., Fishwick B., Bolia A., et al. Complications following peripheral angioplasty. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 84 (2002) 39-42
8. The Board of the Faculty of Clinical Radiology. Standards for patient consent particular to radiology (2005), Royal College of Radiologists, London, England
9. Markose v Epsom & St Helier NHS Trust (2004) EWHC 3130 (QB); (2005) Lloyds Law Rep Med 334.
10. Jacobsen B., Mindell J., and McKee M. Hospital mortality league tables. BMJ 326 (2003) 777-778
11. Shiralkar S., Rennie A., Snow M., Galland R.B., Lewis M.H., and Gower-Thomas K. Doctors' knowledge of radiation exposure: questionnaire study. BMJ 327 (2003) 371-372
12. Groves A.M., Yates S., Win T., et al. CTPA or V/Q scan in pregnancy: survey of healthcare professionals' knowledge of radiation exposure. Radiology 240 (2006) 765-770
13. Elmore J.G., and Gigerenze G.R. Benign breast disease: the risks of communicating risk. N Engl J Med 353 (2005) 279-297
14. Gordon-Lubitz R. Risk communication: problems of presentation and understanding. JAMA 289 (2003) 295
15. Kennedy J.G. What information do patients need about medicines?. "Doc, tell me what I need to know:" a doctor's perspective. BMJ 327 (2003) 862-863
16. Edwards A. Flexible rather than standardised approaches to communicating risks in health care. Qual Saf Health Care 13 (2004) 169-170
17. Dixon-Woods M., Williams S.J., Jackson C.J., Akkad A., Kenyon S., and Habiba M. Why do women consent to surgery, even when they do not want to?. an interactionist and Bourdieusian analysis. Soc Sci Med 62 (2006) 2742-2753