Sensor acceptance model - Measuring patient acceptance of wearable sensors

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 89-95

  Fensli, Rune ^a   Pedersen, P E ^a   Gundersen, T ^b   Hejlesen, O ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AGDER   (Norway)

^b Medical Department   (Norway)

^c AALBORG UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Patient satisfaction; Quality of life; Questionnaires; User acceptance; Wearable sensors

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICINE; BIOSENSOR; HOME CARE; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; TELEMEDICINE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MONITORING, PHYSIOLOGIC; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 38549085705     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3414/ME9106     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Lukowicz P, Kirstein T, Tröster G. Wearable systems for health care applications. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43 (3): 232-238.
2. Maglaveras N, Chouvarda I, Koutkias V Meletiadis S, Haris K, Balas EA. Information Technology Can Enhance Quality in Regional Health Delivery. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (5): 393-400.
3. Fensli R, Gunnarson E, Gundersen T. A wearable ECG-recording system for continuous arrhythmia monitoring in a wireless tele-home-care situation. Proceedings 18th IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems; 2005 June 23-24; Dublin, Ireland; 2005. pp 407-12.
4. Anliker U, Ward JA, Lukowicz P, Troster G, Dolveck F, Baer M, et al. AMON: a wearable multiparameter medical monitoring and alert system. Information Technology in Biomedicine, IEEE Transactions on. 2004; 8 (4): 415-427.
5. Knight JF, Schwirtz A, Psomadelis F, Baber C, Bristow HW, Arvanitis TN. The design of the SensVest. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. 2005; V9 (1): 6-19.
6. Lindholm C, Keinonen T, Kiljander H. Mobile usability: How Nokia Changed the Face of the Mobile Phone: McGraw-Hill; 2003.
7. Sharp H, Rogers Y, Preece J. Interaction Design: Beyond Human Computer Interaction: John Wiley & Sons; 2007.
8. Davis FD. Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989; 13 (3): 319-340.
9. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly. 2003; 27 (3): 425-478.
10. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ. 2000 June 3, 2000; 320 (7248): 1517-1520.
11. Williams TL, May CR, Esmail A. Limitations of Patient Satisfaction Studies in Telehealthcare: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; 7 (4): 293-316.
12. Lehoux P. Patients' Perspectives on High-Tech Home Care: A Qualitative Inquiry into the User-Friendliness of Four Interventions. BMC Health Services Research. 2004; 4: 28.
13. Heinzelmann PJ, Williams CM, Lugn NE, Kvedar JC. Clinical Outcomes Associated with Telemedicine/Telehealth. Telemedicine and e-Health 2005; 11 (3): 329-347.
14. Hopp F, Woodbridge P, Subramanian U, Copeland L, Smith D, Lowery J. Outcomes Associated with a Home Care Telehealth Intervention. Telemedicine and e-Health 2006; 12 (3): 297-307.
15. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE. How to Score Version 2 of the SF-36® Health Survey. Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated; 2000.
16. Stofmeel MAM, van Stel HF, van Hemel NM, Grobbee DE. The relevance of health related quality of life in paced patients. International Journal of Cardiology 2005; 102 (3): 377-382.
17. Doll WJ, Xiaodong D, Raghunathan TS, Torkzadeh G, Xia W. The Meaning and Measurements of User Satisfaction: A Multigroup Invariance Analysis of the End-User Computing Satisfaction Instrument. Journal of Management Information Systems 2004; 21 (1): 227-262.
18. Demiris G. Principles of survey development for telemedicine applications. Journal of Telemedicine & Telecare 2006; 12: 111-115.
19. Fensli R, Gundersen T, Gunnarson E. Design Requirements for Long-Time ECG Recordings in a Tele-Home-Care Situation, A Survey Study. Scandinavian Conference in Health Informatics; 2004 August 23-25; Arendal, Norway; 2004. pp 14-18.
20. McKinney V, Yoon K, Zahedi FM. The Measurement of Web-Customer Satisfaction: An Expectation and Disconfirmation Approach. Information Systems Research 2002; 13 (3): 296-315.
21. Fensli R, Gunnarson E, Gundersen T. Design Requirements for Long-Time ECG Recordings in a Tele-Home-Care Situation, A Survey Study. Proceedings Scandinavian Conference in Health Informatics; 2004 August 23-25; Arendal, Norway; 2004. pp 14-18.
22. Nunnally JC. Psychometric Theory. Second Edition. McGraw-Hill; 1978.
23. Wireless Patient Recording Medical AS. Wireless ECG sensor. [cited 2007 03.30]; Available from: http://www.wprmedical.com
24. Huntleigh Healthcare. Medilog AR4 Digital Holter Recorder. [cited 2007 03.30]. Available from: http://www.medilogdarwin.com/Medilog_AR4.html
25. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 4th ed. New York: HarperCollins; 2001.
26. Winters JM, Dshalalow JH. Medical Instrumentation: Accessibility and Usability Considerations: CRC Press; 2006.
27. Demiris G, Speedie SM, Finkelstein S. Change of Patients' Perceptions of TeleHomeCare. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health 2001; 7 (3): 241-248.