External cephalic version for breech presentation with or without spinal analgesia in nulliparous women at term: A randomized controlled trial

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 110, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1343-1350

  Weiniger, Carolyn F ^a   Ginosar, Yehuda ^b   Elchalal, Uriel ^b   Sharon, Einav ^b   Nokrian, Malka ^b   Ezra, Yossef ^b  

^a HADASSAH HEBREW UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Israel)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUPIVACAINE;

ARTICLE; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; BREECH PRESENTATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; FEMALE; FETUS WEIGHT; HUMAN; LABOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NULLIPARA; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SPINAL ANESTHESIA; ADULT; DELIVERY; METHODOLOGY; PARITY; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; ANESTHESIA, SPINAL; BREECH PRESENTATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PARITY; PREGNANCY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERSION, FETAL;

EID: 38449114349     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000295605.38175.7b     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mode of term singleton breech delivery. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 340. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2006;108:235-7.
2. Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. The management of breech presentation. Guideline No. 20b. RCOG Clinical Green Top Guidelines; 2006.
3. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial Term Breech Collaborative Group. Lancet 2000;356:1375-83.
4. Jackson N, Paterson-Brown S. Physical sequelae of caesarean section. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynecol 2001;15:49-61.
5. Kolas T, Saugstad OD, Daltveit AK, Nilsen ST, Oian P. Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;195:1538-43.
6. Aisenbrey GA, Catanzarite VA, Nelson C. External cephalic version: predictors of success. Obstet Gynecol 1999;94:783-6.
7. Ferguson JE, Armstrong MA, Dyson DC. Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version. Obstet Gynecol 1978;70:722-5.
8. Ezra Y, Elram T, Plotkin V, Elchalal U. Significance of success rate of external cephalic versions and vaginal breech deliveries in counseling women with breech presentation at term. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;90:63-6.
9. Newman RB, Peacock BS, VanDorsten JP, Hunt HH. Predicting success of external cephalic version. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993;169:245-9.
10. Guyer CH, Heard MJ. A prospective audit of external cephalic version at term: are ultrasound parameters predictive of outcome? J Obstet Gynaecol 2001;21:580-2.
11. Hofmeyr GJ. Interventions to help external cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004;(1):CD000184.
12. Macarthur AJ, Gagnon S, Tureanu LM, Downey KN. Anesthesia facilitation of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;191:1219-24.
13. Dugoff L, Stamm CA, Jones OW Mohling SI, Hawkins JL. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 1999:93:345-9.
14. Schorr SJ, Speights SE, Ross EL, Bofill JA, Rust OA, Norman PF, et al. A randomized trial of epidural anesthesia to improve external cephalic version success. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1997;177:1133-7.
15. Mancuso K, Yancey MK, Murphy JA, Markenson GR. Epidural analgesia for cephalic version: a randomized trial. Obstet Gynecol 2000;95:648-51.
16. Cherayil G, Feinberg B, Robinson J, Tsen LC. Central neuraxial blockade promotes external cephalic version success after a failed attempt. Anesth Analg 2002;94:1589-92.
17. Menacker F, Declercq E, Macdorman MF. Cesarean delivery: background, trends, and epidemiology. Semin Perinatol 2006;30:235-41.
18. Brocks V, Philipsen T, Secher NJ. A randomized trial of external cephalic version with tocolysis in late pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1984;91:653-6.
19. Zhang J, Bowes WA Jr, Fortney JA. Efficacy of external cephalic version: a review. Obstet Gynecol 1993;82:306-12.
20. Yogev Y, Horowitz E, Ben-Haroush A, Chen R, Kaplan B. Changing attitudes toward mode of delivery and external cephalic version in breech presentations. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2002;79:221-4.
21. Caukwell S, Joels LA, Kyle PM, Mills MS. Women's attitudes towards management of breech presentation at term. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:486-8.
22. Nassar N, Roberts CL, Barratt A, Bell JC, Olive EC, Peat B. Systemic review of adverse outcomes of external cephalic version and persisting breech presentation at term. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol 2006;20:163-71.
23. Birnbach DJ, Matut J, Stein DJ, Campagnuolo J, Drimbarean C, Grunebaum A, et al. The effect of intrathecal analgesia on the success of external cephalic version. Anesth Analg 2001;93:410-3.
24. Fok WY, Chan LW, Leung TY, Lau TK. Maternal experience of pain during external cephalic version at term. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2005;84:748-51.
25. Leung TY, Sahota DS, Fok WY, Chan LW, Lau TK. Quantification of contact surface pressure exerted during external cephalic version. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2003;82:1017-22.
26. Altman DG, Bland JM. Statistics notes. How to randomize. BMJ 1999;319:703-4.
27. Fortunato SJ, Mercer LJ, Guzic DS. External cephalic version with tocolysis: factors associated with success. Obstet Gynecol 1988;72:59-62.