Preference of continuing care staff for electronic surveys

Canadian Journal of Nursing Research

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 166-180

  McFall, G Peggy ^a   Milke, Doris L ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CapitalCare   (Canada)

Author keywords

Applied research; Computers; Data collection; Staff

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CANADA; DECISION MAKING; E-MAIL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HOME FOR THE AGED; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERNET; METHODOLOGY; MOTIVATION; NURSE ADMINISTRATOR; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; PERSONNEL; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRE; TIME; WORKLOAD;

ALBERTA; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO COMPUTERS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DATA COLLECTION; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HOUSING FOR THE ELDERLY; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; MOTIVATION; NURSE ADMINISTRATORS; NURSING RESEARCH; NURSING STAFF; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; TIME FACTORS; WORKLOAD;

EID: 38449113309     PISSN: 08445621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adderley, D., Hyde, C., & Mauseth, P. (1997). The computer age impacts nurses. Computers in Nursing, 15(1), 43-46.
2. Ajetunmobi, O. (2002). Making sense of critical appraisal. New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bojtor, A. (2003). The importance of social and cultural factors to nursing status. International Journal of Nursing Practice, 9(5), 328-335.
4. Camberg, L., Woods, P., Lock Ooi, W., Hurley, A., Volicer, L., Ashley J., et al. (1999). Evaluation of simulated presence: A personal approach to enhance well-being in persons with Alzheimer's disease. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 47(4), 446-452.
5. Capital Care Group. (1997, August 29). The Capital Care Group job description: Care Manager. Edmonton: Author.
6. Conn, V. S, Burks, K., Rantz, M., & Knudsen, K. S. (2002). Evidence-based practice for gerontological nursing. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 28(2), 45-52.
7. Courtney, K. L., & Craven, C. K. (2005). Best practices in research methods: Factors to weigh when considering electronic data collection. CJNR, 37(3), 151-159.
8. Dumas, J., Dietz, E. O., & Connolly, P. M. (2001). Nurse practitioner use of computer technologies in practice. Computers in Nursing, 19(1), 34-40.
9. Engle, V. F. (1999). Nursing home staff as research partners. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 47(4), 492-493.
10. Faulx, A. L., Vela, S., Das, A., Cooper, G., Sivak, M.V., Isenberg, G., et al. (2005). The changing landscape of practice patterns regarding unsedated endoscopy and propofol use: A national Web survey. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 62(1), 9-15.
11. Fitch, M. I. (2004). Beyond publication. [Guest Editorial.] Journal of Advanced Nursing, 48(1), 1.
12. Gillibrand, W. P., Burton, C., & Watkins, G. G. (2002). Clinical networks for nursing research. International Nursing Review, 49, 188-193.
13. Hanscom, B., Lurie, J. D, Homa, K., & Weinstein, J. N. (2002). Computerized questionnaires and the quality of survey data. Spine, 27(16), 1797-1801.
14. Happell, B. (2004). The Centre for Psychiatric Nursing Research and Practice: An innovative approach to enhancing clinical nursing research in the psychiatric/mental health field. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 25, 47-60.
15. Howard, W. R. (2003). Development of an affordable data collection, reporting, and analysis system. Respiratory Care, 48(2), 131-137.
16. Hutchinson, A. M., & Johnston, L. (2003). Bridging the divide: A survey of nurses' opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 304-315.
17. Johnston, R. L., Sparrow, J. M., Canning, C. R., Tole, D., & Price, N. C. (2005). Pilot national electronic cataract surgery survey. I: Method, descriptive, and process features. Eye, 19, 788-794.
18. Jones, R., & Pitt, N. (1999). Health surveys in the workplace: Comparison of postal, email, and World Wide Web methods. Occupational Medicine, 49, 556-558.
19. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. S. (1986). Response effects in the electronic survey. Public Opinion Quarterly, 50(3), 402-414.
20. Raziano, D. B., Jayadevappa, R., Valenzula, D., Weiner, M., & Lavizzo-Mourey, R. (2001). Email versus conventional postal mail survey of geriatric chiefs. Gerontologist, 41 (6), 799-804.
21. Ruckdeschel, K., & Van Hitsma, K. (1997). Research with nursing home staff: Challenges and solutions. Journal of Mental Health and Aging, 3(2), 209-219.
22. Schleyer, T. K. L., & Forrest, J. L. (2000). Methods for the design and administration of Web-based surveys. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 7(4), 416-425.
23. Valente, S. M. (2003). Research dissemination and utilization: Improving care at the bedside. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 18(2), 114-121.
24. VanDenKerkhof, E. G., Parlow, J. L., Goldstein, D. H., & Milne, B. (2004). In Canada, anesthesiologists are less likely to respond to an electronic, compared to a paper questionnaire. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 51(5), 449-454.
25. Wong, D. H., Gallegos, Y., Weinger, M. B., Clack, S., Slagle, J., & Anderson, C.T. (2003). Changes in intensive care unit nurse task activity after installation of a third-generation intensive care unity information system. Critical Care Medicine, 31, 2488-2949.