The role of collegial interaction in continuing professional development

Journal of Continuing Education in the Health Professions

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 214-219

  Gagliardi, Anna R ^a   Wright, Frances C ^a   Anderson, Michael A B ^b   Davis, Dave ^c  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b Royal Victoria Hospital Barrie   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cancer; Continuing professional development; Multidisciplinary care; Reflective practice; Surgeons; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL EDUCATION; NEOPLASM; PHYSICIAN; PUBLIC RELATIONS; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

CLINICAL PROTOCOLS; DECISION MAKING; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, CONTINUING; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; NEOPLASMS; ONTARIO; PHYSICIANS; VIDEOCONFERENCING;

EID: 38449111827     PISSN: 08941912     EISSN: 1554558X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/chp.140     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Davis DA, Mazmanian PE, Fordis M, Van Harrison R, Thorpe KE, Perrier L. Accuracy of physician self-assessment compared with observed measures of competence: A systematic review. JAMA. 2006;296(9):1094-1102.
2. Davis DA, Thomson MA, Oxman DA, Haynes RB. Changing physician performance: A systematic review of the effect of continuing medical education strategies. JAMA. 1995;274(9):700-705.
3. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB. No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Can Med Assoc J. 1995;153(10):1423-1431.
4. Grimshaw JM, Eccles MP. Is evidence-based implementation of evidence-based care possible? Med J Aust. 2004; 180(suppl 6):S50-S51.
5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Effectiveness of continuing medical education. Accessed February 21, 2007, at http://www.ahrq.gov/downloads/ pub/evidence/pdf/cme/cme.pdf.
6. Cooney A, Gattellari M, Donnelly N, Ward J. Impact of national guidelines about the management of colorectal cancer on Australian surgeons' awareness of evidence. Colorectal Dis. 2004;6(6):418-427.
7. Young JM, Hollands MJ, Solomon MJ. Surgeons' participation in continuing medical education: Is it evidence-based? Med Educ. 2006; 40(5):423-429.
8. Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS. Evidence-based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. Br Med J. 1996;312(7023):71-72.
9. Naylor CD. Grey zones of clinical practice: Some limits to evidence-based medicine. Lancet. 1995;345(8953):840-842.
10. Maier RV. What the surgeon of tomorrow needs to know about evidence-based surgery. Arch Surg. 2006;141(3):317-323.
11. Krahn J, Sauerland S, Rixen D, Gregor S, Bouillon B, Neugebauer EA. Applying evidence-based surgery in daily clinical routine: A feasibility study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2006;126(2):88-92.
12. Scott I, Heyworth R, Fairweather P. The use of evidence-based medicine in the practice of consultant physicians: Results of a questionnaire survey. Aust NZJ Med. 2000;30(3):319-326.
13. Petrova M, Dale J, Fulford BK. Values-based practice in primary care: Easing the tensions between individual values, ethical principles and best evidence. Br J Gen Pract. 2006;56(530):703-709.
14. Marshall JC. Surgical decision-making: Integrating evidence, inference, and experience. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(1):201-215.
15. Dawes M, Sampson U. Knowledge management in clinical practice: A systematic review of information seeking behaviour in physicians. Int J Med Inform. 2003;71(1):9-15.
16. Ebell MH, Shaughnessy A. Information mastery: Integrating continuing medical education with the information needs of clinicians. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2003;23(suppl 1):S53-S65.
17. Gorman P. Information needs in primary care. Medinfo. 2001;10(pt 1):338-342.
18. Curley SP, Connelly DP, Rich EC. Physicians' use of medical knowledge resources: Preliminary theoretical framework and findings. Med Decis Making. 1990;10(4):231-241.
19. McKnight M, Peet M. Health care providers' information seeking: Recent research. Med Ref Serv Q. 2000;19(2):27-50.
20. Verhoeven AA, Boerma EJ, Meyboom-de Jong B. Use of information sources by family physicians: A literature survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995;83(1):85-90.
21. Haug JD. Physicians' preferences for information sources: A metaanalytic study. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1997;85(3):223-232.
22. Ely JW, Osheroff JA, Chambliss ML, Ebell MH, Rosenbaum ME. Answering physicians' clinical questions: Obstacles and potential solutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2005;12(2):217-224.
23. Gabbay J, le May A. Evidence based guidelines or collectively constructed "mindlines"? Ethnographic study of knowledge management in primary care. Br Med J. 2004;329(7473):1013.
24. Antes G, Sauerland S, Seiler CM. Evidence based medicine-from best research evidence to a better surgical practice and health care. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391(2):61-67.
25. McCulloch P, Badenoch D. Finding and appraising evidence. Surg Clin North Am. 2006;86(1):41-57.
26. Lacaine F. Evidence-based medicine in surgical decision making. World J Surg. 2005;29(5):588-591.
27. Slim K. Limits of evidence-based surgery. World J Surg. 2005;29(5): 606-609.
28. National Breast Cancer Centre. Multidisciplinary meetings for cancer care: A guide for health service providers. Accessed February 21, 2006, at http://www.nbcc.org.au/bestpractice/resources/MDM_mdcmeetingguide.pdf.
29. Hensen DE, Frelick FW, Ford LG, et al. Results of a national survey of characteristics of hospital tumour conferences. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1990;170(1):1-6.
30. Department of Health. Manual for cancer services 2004: Topic 2A - the generic multidisciplinary team. Accessed February 21, 2007, at http://www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/13/55/97/04135597.pdf.
31. Wright FC, DeVito C, Langer B, et al. Multidisciplinary cancer conferences: A systematic review and development of practice standards. Eur J Ca. 2007;43(6):1002-1010.
32. Leckie GJ, Pettigrew KE, Sylvain C. Modeling the information seeking of professionals: A general model derived from research on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers. Libr Q. 1996;66:161-193.
33. Strauss A, Corbin J. Basics of Qualitative Research: Grounded Theory Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage Publications; 1990.
34. Mulhall A. In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. J Adv Nurs. 2003;41(3):306-313.
35. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage Publications; 1994.
36. Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative data. Br Med J. 2000;320(7227):114-116.
37. Abraham NS, Gossey JT, Davila JA, Al-Oudat S, Kramer JK. Receipt of recommended therapy by patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;101(6):1320-1328.
38. Newman EA, Guest AS, Helvie MA, et al. Changes in surgical management resulting from case review at breast cancer multidisciplinary tumour board. Cancer. 2006;107(10):2346-2351.
39. Haward R, Amir Z, Borrill C, et al. Breast cancer teams: The impact of constitution, new cancer workload, and method of operation on their effectiveness. Br J Cancer. 2003;89(1):15-22.
40. Lutterbach J, Pagenstecher A, Spreer J, et al. The brain tumor board: Lessons to be learned from an interdisciplinary conference. Onkologie. 2005;28(1):22-26.
41. Petty JK, Vetto JT. Beyond doughnuts: Tumor board recommendations influence patient care. J Cancer Educ. 2002;17(2):97-100.
42. Blazeby JM, Wilson L, Metcalfe C, Nicklin J, English R, Donovan JL. Analysis of clinical decision-making in multi-disciplinary cancer teams. Ann Oncol. 2006;17(3):457-460.
43. Vetto JT, Richert-Boe K, Desler M, DuFrain L, Hagen H. Tumour board formats: "Fascinating case" versus "working conference." J Cancer Educ. 1996;11(2):84-88.
44. Chang JH, Vines E, Bertsch H, et al. The impact of a multidisciplinary breast cancer center on recommendations for patient management: The University of Pennsylvania experience. Cancer. 2001;91(7): 1231-1237.
45. Davis D, Evans M, Jadad A, et al. The case for knowledge translation: Shortening the journey from evidence to effect. Br Med J. 2003; 327(7405):33-35.
46. Schön DA. Educating the Reflective Practitioner. San Francisco, Calif: Jossey-Bass Publishers; 1987.
47. Radecki SE, Nyquist JG, Gates JD, Abrahamson S, Henson DE. Educational characteristics of tumor conferences in teaching and nonteaching hospitals. J Cancer Educ. 1995;9(4):204-216.
48. Nyquist JG, Radecki SE, Gates JD, Abrahamson S. An educational intervention to improve hospital tumor conferences. J Cancer Educ. 1995;10(2):71-77.
49. Gagnon MP, Duplantie J, Fortin JP, Landry R. Implementing telehealth to support medical practice in rural/remote regions: What are the conditions for success? Implement Sci. 2006;24(1):18.
50. Fitch K, Bernstein SJ, Aguilar MS, et al. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User's Manual. Santa Monica, Calif: RAND Corporation; 2001.
51. Sladek RM, Pinnock C, Phillips PA. The informationist: A prospective uncontrolled study. Int J Qual Health Care. 2004;16(6):509-515.