A web-based SNOMED CT browser: Distributed and real-time use of SNOMED CT during the clinical research process

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 631-635

  Richesson, Rachel ^a   Syed, Asif ^b   Guillette, Heather ^a   Tuttle, Mark S ^c   Krischer, Jeffrey ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b Molecular Pathology Division   (United States)

^c APELON INC   (United States)

Author keywords

clinical research informatics; data collection; SNOMED CT; terminology tools

Indexed keywords

DATA ACQUISITION; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR EVALUATION; TERMINOLOGY;

AUTOMATED TOOLS; CLINICAL RESEARCH INFORMATICS; CLINICAL STUDY; DATA COLLECTION; HIGH-QUALITY RESEARCH; RESEARCH STAFF; SNOMED CT BROWSERS; SNOMED-CT;

CLINICAL RESEARCH;

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER NETWORK; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; RARE DISEASE; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COMPUTER COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; DATABASES, FACTUAL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; RARE DISEASES; SYSTEMATIZED NOMENCLATURE OF MEDICINE; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 38449108850     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. CDC, Information Needs and Uses of the Public Health Workforce- Washington, 1997-1998. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2000. 49(6): p. 118-120.
2. Elkin, P. L., et al., Guideline and Quality Indicators for Development, Purchase and Use of Controlled Health Vocabularies. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 2002. 68(1-3): p. 175-186.
3. Fitzmaurice, J. M., K. Adams, and J. M. Eisenberg, Three Decades of Research on Computer Applications in Health Care. JAMIA, 2002. 9(2): p. 144-160.
4. Koop, A. and R. Mosges, The use of handheld computers in clinical trials, in Controlled Clinical Trials. 2002. p. 469-480.
5. Neces, R., et al., Enabling Technology for Knowledge Sharing. AI Magazine, 1991. 12(3).
6. Cimino, J. J., Terminology Tools:State of the Art and Practical Lessons. 2001.
7. Campbell, K. E., et al., Scalable methodologies for distributed development of logic-based convergent medical terminology. Methods Inf Med, 1998. 37(4-5): p. 426-39.
8. Douglas, K. and M. Nubie, System design challenges: the integration of controlled vocabulary use into daily practice. Stud Health Technol Inform, 1997. 46: p. 167-71.
9. Rosenbloom, S. T., et al., Review Paper. Interface Terminologies: Facilitating Direct Entry of Clinical Data into Electronic Health Record Systems. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2006. 13: p. 277-288.
10. McDonald, C. J., et al., The Regenstrief Medical Record System: a quarter century experience. Int J Med Inform, 1999. 54(3): p. 225-53.
11. Chiang, M. F., et al. Reliability of SNOMED-CT Coding by Three Physicians using Two Terminology Browsers. in American Medical Informatics Association Annual Symposium. 2006. Washington, D. C.
12. de Lusignan, S., Codes, classifications, terminologies and nomenclatures: definition, development and application in practice. Inform Prim Care, 2005. 13(1): p. 65-70.
13. Bowie, J., Four options for implementing SNOMED. J AHIMA, 2004. 75(7): p. 30-3; quiz 35-6.
14. Chute, G. C., S. P. Cohn, and J. R. Campbell, A Framework for Comprehensive Health Terminology Systems in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 1998. 5(6): p. 503-510.
15. Fung, K. W., et al., Integrating SNOMED CT into the UMLS: an exploration of different views of synonymy and quality of editing. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2005. 12(4): p. 486-94.
16. Rothschild, A. S., H. P. Lehmann, and G. Hripcsak, Interrater Agreement in Physician-coded Problem List, in American Medical Informatics Association. 2005: Washington, D. C.
17. Bakken, S., et al., Evaluation of the clinical LOINC (Logical Observation Identifiers, Names, and Codes) semantic structure as a terminology model for standardized assessment measures. J Am Med Inform Assoc, 2000. 7(6): p. 529-38.
18. Chiang, M. F., et al., Representation of ophthalmology concepts by electronic systems: adequacy of controlled medical terminologies. Ophthalmology, 2005. 112(2): p. 175-83.
19. Tuttle, M. S., et al., Navigating to Knowledge. Meth Inform Med, 1995. 34: p. 214-231.
20. Tuttle, M. S., et al., Metaphrase:An Aid to the Clinical Conceptualization and Formalization of Patient Problems in Healthcare Enterprises. Methods of Information in Medicine 1998, 1998.
21. Chute, C. G., et al., Desiderata for a Clinical Terminology Server. 2004.
22. Altman, R. B., The Interactions Between Clinical Informatics and Bioinformatics: A Case Study. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc., 2000. 7(5): p. 439-33.
23. Brandt, C. A., et al., Approaches and Informatics Tools to Assist in the Integration of Similar Clinical Research Questionnaires. Methods of Information in Medicine, 2004. 43: p. 156-162.
24. Rindfleisch, T. C. and B. L. Brutlag, Directions for Clinical Research and Genomic Research into the Next Decade. Implications for Informatics. Journal of the American Medical Association, 1998. 5: p. 404-411.