Comparison of dilute and neat formulations of Anvil® by ultra-low volume ground application against anopheles quadrimaculatus in Arkansas

Journal of the American Mosquito Control Association

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 312-314

  Meisch, M V ^a   Dame, David A ^b   Lewis, Carolyn N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b Entomological Services   (United States)

Author keywords

Anopheles quadrimaculatus; Anvil ; Arkansas; Ground application; Sumithrin; Ultra low volume

Indexed keywords

ANOPHELES QUADRIMACULATUS;

INSECTICIDE; PHENOTHRIN; PYRETHROID;

ANIMAL; ANOPHELES; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MOSQUITO; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; ANOPHELES; ARKANSAS; INSECTICIDES; MOSQUITO CONTROL; PYRETHRINS;

EID: 38449105669     PISSN: 8756971X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2987/8756-971X(2007)23[312:CODANF]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. Abbott WS. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J Econ Entomol 18:265-267.
2. Dennett JA, Meisch MV. 2000. Simple technique for rapid colonization of Anopheles quadrimaculatus using adults aspirated from livestock barns. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 16:268-270.
3. Dumbauld RK, Rafferty JE, (USDA-Forest Service, Forest Insect & Disease Management Methods Application Group [FIDMMAG]). 1977. Field manual for characterizing spray from small aircraft. Davis, CA: FIDMMAG. 7734-2601. 68 p.
4. Efird PK, Inman AD, Dame DA, Meisch MV. 1991. Efficacy of various ground-applied cold aerosol adulticides against Anopheles quadrimaculatus. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 7:207-209.
5. Ham CM, Brown JR, Musser RO, Rutledge CR, Meisch MV. 1999. Comparison of electrostatic versus nonelectrostatic ULV sprays of Aqua Reslin™ against Anopheles quadrimaculatus adults. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 15:312-314.
6. Meisch MV, Coombes LE. 1976. A pilot mosquito abatement district in the rice growing areas of Arkansas. Proc N J Mosq Control Assoc 62:190-195.