The quality of reporting of health informatics evaluation studies: A pilot study

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 193-197

  Talmon, Jan ^a   Ammenwerth, Elske ^b   Geven, Thom ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY FOR HEALTH SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

evaluation studies; medical informatics; publishing; quality control; STARE HI

Indexed keywords

HEALTH; PAPER; PUBLISHING; STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING;

EVALUATION STUDY; HEALTH INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PILOT STUDIES; STARE-HI; STRUCTURED ABSTRACT;

QUALITY CONTROL;

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; INFORMATION SCIENCE; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PILOT STUDY; QUALITY CONTROL;

EVALUATION STUDIES AS TOPIC; INFORMATICS; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; PILOT PROJECTS; QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 38449105021     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (7)

1. Altman DG. Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement. Bmj 1996;313(7057):570-1.
2. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, Gatsonis CA, Glasziou PP, Irwig LM, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy. Clin Chem 2003;49(1):1-6.
3. Ammenwerth E, Brender J, Nykanen P, Prokosch HU, Rigby M, Talmon J. Visions and strategies to improve evaluation of health information systems. Reflections and lessons based on the HIS-EVAL workshop in Innsbruck. Int J Med Inform 2004;73(6):479-91.
4. Talmon JL, Ammenwerth E. STARE-HI: STAtement on the Reporting of Evaluations in Health Informatics. http://iig. umit. at/efmi/stare-hi/Stare- HIv0. 12. doc [last accessed 1 Dec 2006]
5. Kane RL, Wang J, Garrard J. Reporting in randomized clinical trials improved after adoption of the CONSORT statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2007;60(3):241-9.
6. Moher D, Jones A, Lepage L. Use of the CONSORT statement and quality of reports of randomized trials: a comparative before-and-after evaluation. JAMA 2001;285(15):1992-5.
7. Haynes RB, Mulrow CD, Huth EJ, Altman DG, Gardner MJ. More informative abstracts revisited. Ann Intern Med 1990;113(1):69-76.