A comparison of face lift techniques in eight consecutive sets of identical twins

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 120, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1667-1673

  Antell, Darrick E ^a,b   Orseck, Michael J ^a  

^a EAR AND THROAT HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b Division of Plastic Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EYELID RECONSTRUCTION; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MONOZYGOTIC TWINS; PHOTOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RHYTIDOPLASTY; SMASECTOMY; SUPERFICICAL MUSCULOAPONEUROTIC SYSTEM FLAP; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; TWINS;

AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHYTIDOPLASTY; TWINS, MONOZYGOTIC;

EID: 38449104906     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000288016.24950.20     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Nichols, R. C., and Bilbro, W. C., Jr. The diagnosis of twin zygosity. Acta Genet. Stat. Med. 16: 264, 1996.
2. Baker, D. C. Lateral SMASectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 100: 80, 513.
3. Matarasso, A. Buccal fat pad excision: Aesthetic improvement of the midface. Ann. Plast. Surg. 26: 413, 1991.
4. Hamra, S. T. A study of the long term effect of malar fat repositioning in face lift surgery: Short-term success but long term failure. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 110: 940, 2002.
5. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank, 2005.
6. Mitz, V., and Peyronie, M. The superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) in the parotid and cheek area. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 61: 80, 1976.
7. Matarasso, A., Elkwood, A., Rankin, M., and Elkowitz, M. National plastic surgery survey: Face lift techniques and complications. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 106: 1185, 2000.
8. Antell, D., and Taczanowski, E. M. How environment and lifestyle choices influence the aging process. Ann. Plast. Surg. 43: 585, 1999.
9. Rees, T. D., and Aston, S. J. A clinical evaluation of the results of submusculoaponeurotic dissection and fixation in face lifts. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 60: 851, 1977.
10. Webster, R. C., Smith, R. C., Papsidero, M. J., et al. Comparison of SMAS placation with SMAS imbrication in face lifting. Laryngoscope 92: 901, 1982.
11. Prado, A., Andrales, P., Danilla, S., Castillo, P., and Leniz, P. A clinical retrospective study comparing two short-scar face lift: Minimal access cranial suspension versus lateral SMASectomy. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 117: 1413, 2006.
12. Ivy, E. J., Lorenc, Z. P., and Aston, S. J. Is there a difference? A prospective study comparing lateral and standard SMAS face lifts with extended SMAS and composite rhytidectomies. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 98: 1135, 1996.
13. Kamer, F. M., and Frankel, A. S. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: An objective comparison. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 102: 878, 1998.
14. Pitman, G. H. The Deep-Plane Demystified (Videotape). St. Louis: Quality Medical Publishing, 2000.
15. Stuzin, J. M., Baker, T. J., Gordon, H. L., and Baker, T. M. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin. Plast. Surg. 22: 295, 1995.
16. Hamra, S. T. The role of the septal reset in creating a youthful eyelid-cheek complex in facial rejuvenation. Plast. Reconstr. Surg. 113: 2124, 2004.