Direct referral of patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction to primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Pre-hospital use of tele-medicine and risk stratification;Ikkelægeledsaget transport af patienter til primær perkutan koronarintervention. Præhospital anvendelse af telemedicinsk elektrokardiogram og risikostratificering

Ugeskrift for Laeger

Volumn 169, Issue 47, 2007, Pages 4043-4047

  Jepsen, Hansehenrik ^a   Egstrup, Kenneth ^a,b  

^a Sygehus Fyn   (Denmark)

^b SVENDBORG HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CORONARY CARE UNIT; DENMARK; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; FEMALE; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT REFERRAL; PATIENT SELECTION; PATIENT TRANSPORT; QUESTIONNAIRE; RESUSCITATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TELEMEDICINE; TRANSLUMINAL CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; CARDIOLOGY SERVICE, HOSPITAL; CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; DENMARK; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; PATIENT SELECTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REFERRAL AND CONSULTATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; TELEMEDICINE; TRANSPORTATION OF PATIENTS;

EID: 38449104502     PISSN: 00415782     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Zijlstra F, Hoorntje JCA, de Boer MJ et al. Long-term benefit of primary angioplasty as compared with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999;341:1413-9.
2. Keeley EC, Boura JA, Grines CL. Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction: a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials. Lancet 2003;361:13-20.
3. Dalby M, Bouzamondo A, Lechat P et al. Transfer for primary angioplasty versus immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction: a meta-analysis. Circulation 2003;108:1809-14.
4. Andersen HR, Nielsen TT, Rasmussen K et al. A comparison of coronary angioplasty with fibrinolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 2003;349:733-42.
5. Brodie BR, Stuckey TD, Muncy DB et al. Importance of time-to-reperfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction with and without cardiogenic shock treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am Heart J 2003;145:708-15.
6. Van't Hof AWJ, van de Wetering H, Ernst N et al on behalf of the On-TIME study group. A quantitative analysis of the benefits of pre-hospital infarct angioplasty triage on outcome in patients undergoing primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. Eur Heart J Suppl 2005;7:36-40.
7. Kardiologiske aspekter af den præhospitale behandling i Danmark. Cardiologisk Forum, nr. 4 2003.
8. Akut koronart syndrom. Retningslinjer for diagnostik og behandling. Cardiologisk Forum, nr. 1 2005.
9. Terkelsen CJ, Lassen JF, Nørgaard BL et al. Reduction of treatment delay in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction: impact of pre-hospital diagnosis and direct referral to primary percutanous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J 2005;26:770-7.
10. Andersen HR, Terkelsen CJ, Thuesen L et al. Myocardial infarction centres: the way forward. Heart 2005;91:iii12-5.
11. Widimsky P, Budesinsky T, Vorac D et al. Long distance transport for primary angioplasty vs immediate thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction. Final results of the randomized national multicentre trial PRAGUE-2. Eur Heart J 2003;24:94-104.
12. Terkelsen CJ, Nørgaard BL, Lassen JF et al. Telemedicine used for remote prehospital diagnosing in patients suspected of acute myocardial infarction. J Intern Med 2002;252:412-20.
13. Widemsky P, Groch L, Zelízko M et al. Multicentre randomized trial comparing transport to primary angioplastyvs immediate thrombolysis vs combined strategy for patients with acute myocardial infarction presenting to a community hospital without a catherization laboratory. The PRAGUE study. Eur Heart J 2000;21:823-31.