Routine prenatal urine dipstick testing

Journal of Reproductive Medicine for the Obstetrician and Gynecologist

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 984-

  Alto, William A ^a   Yetman, Cornelius A ^b  

^a Maine Dartmouth Family Practice Residency   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW ENGLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Prenatal urine dipstick testing; Screening; Urinalysis

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT;

BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GLUCOSURIA; HUMAN; LETTER; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PREECLAMPSIA; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY DIABETES MELLITUS; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROTEINURIA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TEST STRIP; URINE;

BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; DIABETES, GESTATIONAL; FEMALE; GLYCOSURIA; HUMANS; PRE-ECLAMPSIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL CARE; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; PROTEINURIA; REAGENT STRIPS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 38449100292     PISSN: 00247758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists: Gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:525-538
2. Waugh JJS, Clark TJ, Divakaran TG, et al: Accuracy of urinalysis dipstick techniques in predicting significant proteinuria in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:769-777
3. Alto WA: No need for routine glycosuria/proteinuria screen in pregnant women. J Fam Pract 2005;54:978-983
4. Murray N, Hormer C, Davis GK, et al: The clinical utility of routine urinalysis in pregnancy: A prospective study. Med J Aust 2002;77:477-480
5. Wolf M, Shah A, Jimenex-Kimble R, et al: Differential risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy among Hispanic women. J Am Soc Nephrol 2004;15:1330-1338