Refining DICOM for pathology-progress from the IHE and DICOM pathology working groups

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 129, Issue , 2007, Pages 434-438

  Le Bozec, Christel ^a,b,c,d   Henin, Dominique ^a   Fabiani, Bettina ^a   Schrader, Thomas ^e   Garcia Rojo, Marcial ^f   Beckwith, Bruce ^g  

^a ADICAP   (France)

^b INSERM   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

^d HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^e CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^f HOSPITAL GENERAL UNIVERSITARIO DE CIUDAD REAL   (Spain)

^g BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

imaging; integration; pathology; standards

Indexed keywords

HEALTH CARE; IMAGING TECHNIQUES; INTEGRATION; MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; STANDARDS;

ANATOMICAL PATHOLOGY; ELECTRONIC HEALTHCARE; HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; INTEGRATING THE HEALTHCARE ENTERPRISE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; REAL-WORLD OBJECTS; TISSUE SAMPLES; WORKING GROUPS;

PATHOLOGY;

ARTICLE; HOSPITAL DEPARTMENT; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATHOLOGY; STANDARD; SYSTEM ANALYSIS;

HUMANS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PATHOLOGY; PATHOLOGY DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; RADIOLOGY INFORMATION SYSTEMS; SYSTEMS INTEGRATION;

EID: 38449100208     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. HL7 organization: Health Level 7, http://www. hl7. org
2. DICOM 3 Standard, NEMA and Global Engineering Group: http://www. nema. org.
3. IHE-http://ihe. univ-rennes1. fr/whatisihe/. Accessed January, 2006
4. Klossa J, Cordier JC, Flandrin G, Got C, Hémet J. An European de facto standard for image folders applied to telepathology and teaching. Inter. J. Med. Information. 1998, 48:207-216.
5. Burnett L, Chesher D, Mudaliar Y. Improving the quality of information on pathology request forms. Ann Clin Biochem, 2004. 41(Pt 1): p. 53-6.
6. ADASP. Consultations in surgical pathology. Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Am J Surg Pathol. 1993 Jul;17(7):743-5.
7. Campbell, F. and D. F. Griffiths, Quantitative audit of the content of histopathology reports. J Clin Pathol, 1994. 47(4): p. 360-1.
8. Imperato PJ, et al., Results of a cooperative educational program to improve prostate pathology reports among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. J Community Health, 2002. 27(1): p. 1-13.
9. Fleming KA. Evidence-based pathology, J Pathol. Jun 1996; 179(2): 127-8.
10. Fleming KA. Evidence-based cellular pathology, Lancet, 2002; 359(9312): 1149-50.
11. Cowan DF. Quality assurance in anatomic pathology. An information system approach. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 1990. 114(2): p. 129-34.
12. Goldstein NS. Diagnostic errors in surgical pathology. Clin Lab Med, 1999. 19(4): p. 743-56.
13. Zarbo RJ, Meier FA, Raab SS. Error detection in anatomic pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2005. 129(10): p. 1237-45.