Personalismo and breaking barriers: Accessing hispanic populations for clinical services and research

Geriatric Nursing

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 289-296

  Evans, Bronwynne C ^a,d   Coon, David W ^b   Crogan, Neva L ^c,d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^d NCGNP section of Geriatric Nursing   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAREGIVER; COST OF ILLNESS; CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY; DEMENTIA; EDUCATION; EMPATHY; ETHNOLOGY; FAMILY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HEALTH SERVICE; HISPANIC; HOME CARE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE ATTITUDE; NURSING; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; ARIZONA; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CAREGIVERS; COMMUNICATION; COST OF ILLNESS; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; DEMENTIA; EMPATHY; FAMILY; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH SERVICES ACCESSIBILITY; HEALTH SERVICES NEEDS AND DEMAND; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HOME NURSING; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSE'S ROLE; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

EID: 38449098277     PISSN: 01974572     EISSN: 15283984     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2007.08.008     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. U.S. Bureau of the Census. Facts for features. Available: http://www.census.gov/Press-Release/www/ releases/archives/facts for features_special_editions/ 007173.html
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging. A statistical profile of Hispanic older Americans aged 65+. Available: http://www.aoa.gov/ press/news/2005/facts-on-hispanic-elderly2005.pdf
3. National Alliance for Caregiving & American Association of Retired Persons. Caregiving in the U.S. Available: www.caregiving.org/data/04finalreport.pdf. Cited July 18, 2007.
4. Coon D, Rubert M, Solano N, et al. Well-being, appraisal, and coping in Latina and Caucasian female dementia caregivers: findings from the REACH study. Aging Ment Health 2004;8:330-45.
5. Angel J, Angel R, Aranda M, et al. Can the family still cope? Social support and health as determinants of nursing home use in older Mexican-origin population. J Aging Health 2004;16:338-54.
6. Wendler D, Kington R, Madans J, et al. Are racial and ethnic minorities less willing to participate in health research? PLoS Med 2006;3: e19.
7. Gallagher-Thompson D, Singer L, et al. Effective recruitment strategies for Latino and Caucasian dementia family caregivers in intervention research. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2004;12:1-7.
8. Gallagher-Thompson D, Solano N, Coon D, et al. Recruitment and retention of Latino dementia family caregivers in intervention research: issues to face, lessons to learn. Gerontologist 2003;43:45-51.
9. Arredondo P. Mujeres latinas-santas y marquesas. Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol 2002;8:308-19.
10. Nichols L, Martindale-Adams J, Burns R, et al. Social marketing as a framework for recruitment: illustrations from the REACH study. J Aging Health 2004;16:157S-76S.
11. Crist J, Escandon-Dominguez S. Identifying and recruiting Mexican American partners and sustaining community partnerships. J Transcult Nurs 2003;14: 266-71.
12. Crist J, Garcia-Smith D, Phillips L. Accommodating the stranger en casa: how Mexican American elders and caregivers decide to use formal care. Res Theory Nurs Pract 2006;20:109-26.
13. Crist J, Velazquez H, Durnan I, et al. Instrument development of the Confidence in Home Care Services Questionnaire for use with elders and caregivers of Mexican descent. Public Health Nurs 2006;23:284-91.
14. Teitelman J, Watts J, Meisel J, et al. Alzheimer's caregiver focus groups: a method for identifying caregivers' perceptions of service coverage gaps. Gerontol Geriatr Educ 2001;22:73-85.
15. Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997.
16. Morrison-Beedy D, Cote-Arnesault D, Fischbeck Feinstein N. Maximizing results with focus groups: moderator and analysis issues. Appl Nurs Res 2001;14:48-53.
17. Morgan D, Krueger R. When to use focus groups and why. In Morgan D, editor. Successful focus groups: advancing the state of the art. Newbury Park, CA: Sage; 1993, p. 3-19.
18. Miles M, Huberman A. Qualitative data analysis, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1994.
19. Huberman A, Miles M. Data management and analysis methods. In: Denzin N, Lincoln Y, editors. Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998, p. 179-210.
20. Frank A. The wounded storyteller: body, illness, and ethics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1995.
21. Evans B. Student perceptions: the influence of a nursing workforce diversity grant on retention. J Nurs Educ 2007;46:354-59.
22. Markides K, Miranda M. Minorities, aging and health: an overview. In: Markides K, Miranda M, editors. Minorities, aging and health. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1997, p. 1-11.
23. Tsiboulki A, Wolff K. Using focus group interviews to understand staff perceptions from training in the therapeutic community model. J Drug Educ 2003;33: 143-57.