|
Volumn 48, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 1131-1135
|
Comparison of the results of open carpal tunnel release and KnifeLight® carpal tunnel release
|
Author keywords
Carpal tunnel release; KnifeLight ; Minimal access surgery; Nerve conduction changes; Office surgery
|
Indexed keywords
ADULT;
AGED;
ARTICLE;
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME;
CLINICAL ARTICLE;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
DISEASE SEVERITY;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
MEDIAN NERVE;
MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION;
MEDICAL RECORD REVIEW;
NERVE CONDUCTION;
PAIN;
PARESTHESIA;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
SURGEON;
SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
CONVALESCENCE;
DECOMPRESSION SURGERY;
ENDOSCOPE;
ENDOSCOPY;
FOLLOW UP;
HOSPITALIZATION;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY;
NEUROSURGERY;
PAIN ASSESSMENT;
PROBABILITY;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
ADULT;
AGED;
CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME;
DECOMPRESSION, SURGICAL;
ENDOSCOPES;
ENDOSCOPY;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
NEUROSURGICAL PROCEDURES;
PAIN MEASUREMENT;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROBABILITY;
RECOVERY OF FUNCTION;
RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;
TREATMENT OUTCOME;
|
EID: 38449085518
PISSN: 00375675
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (9)
|
References (17)
|