Forecasting demand for paratransit required by the Americans with disabilities act

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1571, 1997, Pages 67-74

  Koffman, David ^a   Lewis, David ^a  

^a Crain and Associates Inc ^*  (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843113320     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1571-09     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. U.S. Department of Transportation. Transportation for Individuals with Disabilities. Final Rule. 49 C.F.R. Parts 27, 37 and 38, 1991.
2. Crain & Associates, Inc,; Hickling Lewis Brod, Inc.; and Gilmore Research Group. ADA and OPTIONS Paratransit Demand Estimation: Final Report. King County Metro, Seattle, Wash., Dec. 1995.
3. Urbitran Associates, Hickling Corporation, Louis Harris and Associates, and Jacqueline Golob Associates. Paratransit Eligibility and Demand Study. New York City Transit Authority, Nov. 1993.
4. ParaPlan, Version 3.0. Hickling Lewis Brod, Inc., 1994.
5. Preliminary Regulatory Impact Analysis of Transportation Accessibility Requirements for the Americans with Disabilities Act. Office of the Secretary, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1991.
6. Couture, M. R., and T. Dooley. Analyzing Traveler Attitudes To Resolve Intended and Actual Use of a New Transit Service. In Transportation Research Record 563, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981.
7. Sheskin, I. M. Relationship Between Surveyed Behavioral Intent and Actual Behavior in Transit Usage. In Transportation Research Record 1297, TRB, National Research Council. Washington, D.C., 1991.
8. Hickling Lewis Brod, Inc. Demand for Paratransit Services in New York City. New York City Transit Authority, June 1995.
9. Crain & Associates, Inc. Demand for Paratransit in the San Francisco Bay Area. Metropolitan Transportation Commission, Oakland, Calif., Jan. 1995.