The performance of internet-based business models: Evidence from the banking industry

Journal of Business

Volumn 78, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 893-947

  DeYoung, Robert ^a  

^a FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843112736     PISSN: 00219398     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/429648     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Alchian, A. 1963. Reliability of progress curves in airframe production. Econometrica 31: 679-93.
2. Amel, D.F. 1993. State laws affecting the geographic expansion of commercial banks. Unpublished manuscript, Washington, D.C.: Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.
3. Arrow, K. 1962. The economic implications of learning by doing. Review of Economic Studies (June): 155-73.
4. Asher, H. 1956. Cost-quantity relationships in the airframe industry. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
5. Berger, A. N., R. S. Demsetz, and R E. Strahan. 1999. The consolidation of the financial services industry: Causes, consequences, and implications for the future. Journal of Banking and Finance 23:135-94.
6. Berger, A. N., W. C. Hunter, and S. G. Timme. 1993. The efficiency of financial institutions: A review and preview of research past, present, and future. Journal of Banking and Finance 17:221-49.
7. Brislin, P., and A. Santomero. 1991. De novo banking in the third district. Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia Business Review (January): 3-12.
8. Clark, J. A. 1988. Economies of scale and scope at depository financial institutions: A review of the literature. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review (September/October): 16-33.
9. Courchane, M., D. Nickerson, and R. J. Sullivan. 2002. Financial innovation, strategic real options, and endogenous competition: Theory and an application to Internet banking. Unpublished manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
10. DeYoung, R. 1999. The birth, growth, and life or death of newly chartered commercial banks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 23, no. 3: 18-35.
11. _. 2001. The financial performance of pure play Internet Banks. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 25, no. 1:60-75.
12. DeYoung, R., L. G. Goldberg, and L. J. White. 1999. Youth, adolescence, and maturity of banks: Credit availability to small business in an era of banking consolidation. Journal of Banking and Finance 23:463-92.
13. DeYoung, R. and I. Hasan. 1998. The performance of de novo commercial banks: A profit efficiency approach. Journal of Banking and Finance 22:565-87.
14. DeYoung, R. and W. C. Hunter. 2003. Deregulation, the Internet, and the competitive viability of large banks and community banks. In The future of banking, ed. B. Gup. Westport, CT: Quorom Books.
15. Evanoff, D. D., and P. R. Israilevich. 1991. Productive efficiency in banking. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives (July): 11-32.
16. Furst, K., W. W. Lang, and D. E. Nolle. 2002. Internet banking. Journal of Financial Services Research 22:95-118.
17. Ghemawat, P. 1985. Building strategy on the experience curve. Harvard Business Review (March-April): 143-49.
18. Gilbert, A. 1984. Bank market structure and competition. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking 16:614-45.
19. Greene, W. H. 1997. Econometric analysis. 3d ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
20. Griliches, Z. 1979. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell Journal of Economics 10:92-116.
21. Hartley, K., and W. Corcoran. 1978. The time-cost trade-off for airliners. Journal of Industrial Economics 26:209-22.
22. Hughes, J. P., W. Lang, L. J. Mester, and C. Moon. 2001. Recovering risky technologies using the almost ideal demand system: An application to U.S. banking. Unpublished manuscript. Rutgers University.
23. Humphrey, D. B. 1990. Why do estimates of bank scale economies differ? Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond Economic Review (September/October): 38-50.
24. Hunter, W. C., and A. Srinivasan. 1990. Determinants of de novo bank performance. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Economic Review (March): 14-25.
25. Huyser, D. 1986 De novo bank performance in the seven tenth district states. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Banking Studies:13-22.
26. Remolona, E. M., and K. C. Wulfekuhler. 1992. Finance companies, bank competition, and niche markets. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Quarterly Review (Summer): 25-37.
27. Rose, J., and D. Savage. 1984. De novo entry and performance: Bank holding companies versus independent banks. Journal of Bank Research (Summer): 95-106.
28. Rossi, C. V. 1998. Mortgage banking cost structure: Resolving an enigma. Journal of Economics and Business 50, no. 2:219-34.
29. Sullivan, R. J. 2000. How has the adoption of Internet banking affected performance and risk at banks? A look at internet banking in the tenth Federal Reserve district. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Financial Industry Perspectives (December): 1-16.