Measuring patient knowledge of the risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 54, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 143-152

  Radosevich, David M ^a,d   Partin, Melissa R ^b   Nugent, Sean ^b   Nelson, David ^b   Flood, Ann Barry ^c   Holtzman, Jeremy ^a   Dillon, Nancy ^b   Haas, Michele ^b   Wilt, Timothy J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d Department of Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

Decision making; Patient education; Prostate specific antigen; Prostatic neoplasms; Risk assessment

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER SCREENING; DECISION MAKING; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; RELIABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SAMPLE; VALIDATION PROCESS;

AGED; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMORBIDITY; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES; PATIENT EDUCATION; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VETERANS;

EID: 3843103581     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00207-6     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Sarma AV, Schottenfeld D. Prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival in the United States: 1981-2001. Semin Urol Oncol 2002;20(February):3- 9.
2. American Cancer Society. Cancer Facts and Figures - 2001. Atlanta, GA: American Cancer Society; 2001.
3. Office of Technology Assessment. Costs and effectiveness of prostate cancer screening in elderly men. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1995.
4. Harris R., Lohr K.N. Screening for prostate cancer: an update of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann. Intern. Med. 137(11):2002;917-929
5. von Escheinbach A., Ho M., Cunningham M., Lins N. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of prostate cancer: update. Cancer. 80:1997;1805-1807
6. O'Connor A. Using patient decision aids to promote evidence-based decision making. ACP J Club 2001;July-August:A11-2.
7. O'Connor A.M., Rostom A., Fiset V., Tetroe J., Entwisle V., Llewellyn-Thomas H., et al. Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Br Med J. 319:1999;731-734
8. Chan E.C.Y., Sulmasy D.P. What should men know about prostate-specific antigen screening before giving informed consent? Am J Med. 105:1998;266-274
9. Flood A.B., Wennberg J.E., Nease R.F., Fowler F.J., Ding J., Hynes L.M., et al. The importance of patient preference in the decision to screen for prostate cancer. J Gen Intern Med. 11:1996;342-349
10. Wilt T.J., Paul J., Murdoch M., Nelson D., Nugent S., Rubins H.B. Educating men about prostate cancer screening: a randomized trial of a mailed pamphlet. Eff Clin Pract. 4:2001;112-120
11. Frosch D.L., Kaplan R.M., Felitti V. Evaluation of two methods to facilitate shared decision making for men considering the prostate-specific antigen test. J Gen Intern Med. 16:2001;391-396
12. Schapira M.M., VanRuiswyk J. The effect of an illustrated pamphlet decision-aid on the use of prostate cancer screening tests. J Fam Pract. 49(5):2000;418-424
13. Volk R.J., Cass A.R., Spann S.J. A randomized controlled trial of shared decision making for prostate cancer screening. Arch Fam Med. 8:1999;333-340
14. McIver JP, Carmines EG. Unidimensional scaling. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage; 1981.
15. Dillman DA. The total design method. New York: Wiley; 1978.
16. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. New York: Wiley; 2000.
17. Crocker L, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace Javanovich College Publishers; 1986.
18. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
19. Ebel RL. Measuring educational achievement. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall; 1965.
20. Shadish WR, Cook TD, Campbell DT. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company; 2002.
21. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
22. Kuder G.F., Richardson M.W. The theory of estimation of test reliability. Psychometrika. 2:1937;151-160
23. Cronbach L.J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 16:1951;297-334
24. Stewart AL, Ware JE, editors. Measuring functioning and well-being: the Medical Outcomes Study approach. Durham: Duke University Press; 1992.
25. Feinstein AR. Clinimetrics. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1987.
26. Barry M.J., Fowler F.J., O'Leary M.P., Bruskewitz R.C., Holtgrewe H.L., Mebust W.K., et al. Correlation of the American Urological Association Symptom Index with self-administered version of the Madsen-Iversen, Boyarsky and Maine Medical Assessment Program Symptom Indexes. J Urol. 148:1992;1558-1563
27. Fowler F.J., Wennberg J.E., Timothy R.P., Barry M.J., Mulley A.G., Hanley D. Symptom status and quality of life following prostatectomy. J Am Med Assoc. 259(20):1988;3018-3022
28. O'Connor A.M. Validation of a decisional conflict scale. Med Decis Making. 15:1995;25-30
29. Lerman C.E., Brody D.S., Caputo G.C., Smith D.G., Lazaro C.G., Wolfson H.G. Patients' perceived involvement in care scale: relationship to attitudes about illness and medical care. J Gen Intern Med. 5:1990;29-33
30. Holmes-Rovner M., Kroll J., Schmitt N., Rovner D.R., Breer L., Rohert M.L., et al. Patient satisfaction with health care decisions: the satisfaction with decision scale. Med Decis Making. 16:1996;58-64
31. Dillman DA, Sangster RL, Tarnai J, Rockwood TH. Understanding differences in people's answers to telephone and mail surveys. In: Braverman MT, Slater JK, editors. Advances in survey research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1996. p. 110.
32. Rockwood T.H., Sangster R.L., Dillman D.A. The effect of response categories on questionnaire answers: context and mode effects. Sociol Methods Res. 26:1997;118-140
33. Schwarz N., Strack F., Mai H.-P. Assimilation and contrast effects in part-whole question sequences: a conversational logic analysis. Pub Opin Q. 55:1991;3-23