On the concordance among empirical confusion matrices for visual and tactual letter recognition

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 392-397

  Brusco, Michael J ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3843095854     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03194887     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. CRAIG, J. C. (1979). A confusion matrix for factually presented letters. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 409-411.
2. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1964). Randomization tests. Journal of Psychology, 57, 445-449.
3. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1966). Statistical inference and nonrandom samples. Psychological Bulletin, 66, 486-487.
4. EDGINGTON, E. S. (1969). Approximate randomization tests. Journal of Psychology, 72, 143-149.
5. FISHER, D. R. MONTY, R. A., & GLUCKSBERG, S. (1969). Visual confusion matrices: Fact or artifact? Journal of Psychology, 71, 111-125.
6. FISHER, R. A. (1935). The design of experiments. London: Oliver & Boyd.
7. GILMORE, G. C., HERSH, H., CARAMAZZA, A., & GRIFFIN, J. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity derived from recognition errors. Perception & Psychophysics, 25, 425-431.
8. 0: ρ = 0. Psychological Methods, 1, 184-198.
9. HUBERT, L. J. (1978). Generalized proximity function comparisons. British Journal of Mathematical & Statistical Psychology, 31, 179-192.
10. HUBERT, L. J. (1987) Assignment methods in combinatorial data analysis. New York: Marcel Dekker.
11. JOHNSON, K. O., & PHILLIPS, J. R. (1981). Tactile spatial resolution: I. Two-point discrimination, gap detection, grating resolution, and letter recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology, 46, 1177-1191.
12. KIKUCHI, T., YAMASHITA, Y., SAGAWA, K., & WAKE, T. (1979). An analysis of tactile letter confusions. Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 295-301.
13. LOOMIS, J. M. (1974). Tactile letter recognition under different modes of stimulus presentation. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 401-408.
14. LOOMIS, J. M. (1982). Analysis of tactile and visual confusion matrices. Perception & Psychophysics, 31, 41-52.
15. MEWHORT, D. J. K., & DOW, M. L. (1979). Multidimensional letter similarity: A confound with brightness? Perception & Psychophysics, 26, 325-326.
16. MILLER, G. A., & NICELY, P. E. (1955). Analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27, 338-352.
17. PEW, R. W., & GARDNER, G. T. (1965). [Unpublished data]. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
18. PHILLIPS, J. R., JOHNSON, K. O., & BROWNE, H. M. (1983). A comparison of visual and two modes of tactual letter resolution. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 243-249.
19. PITTMAN, E. J. G. (1937). Significance tests which may be applied to samples from any population: II. The correlation coefficient test. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 4, 225-232.
20. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1971a). Alphabetic confusion: A test of models for individuals. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 449-454.
21. TOWNSEND, J. T. (1971b). Theoretical analysis of an alphabet confusion matrix. Perception & Psychophysics, 9, 40-50.
22. VAN DER HEIJDEN, A. H. C. MALHAS, M. S. M., & VAN DEN ROOVAART, B. P. (1984). An empirical zinterletter confusion matrix for continuous-line capitals. Perception & Psychophysics, 35, 85-88.
23. VEGA-BERMUDEZ, F., JOHNSON, K. O., & HSIAO, S. S. (1991). Human tactile pattern recognition: Active versus passive touch, velocity effects, and patterns of confusion. Journal of Neurophysiology, 65, 531-546.